Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $26,157
32%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 32%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: bruen

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Ninth Circuit: Felon Has ‘Right to Possess Firearm for Self-Defense’

    05/10/2024 11:39:56 AM PDT · by ChicagoConservative27 · 41 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 05/10/2024 | AWR HAWKINS
    On Thursday a three-judge panel from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided that Steven Duarte, a felon, has a “right to possess a firearm for self-defense.” Courthouse News Service noted Duarte has five felony convictions and was a member of a street gang in Los Angeles. The decision upholding Duarte’s gun rights was split, with George W. Bush appointee Carlos Bea and Donald Trump appointee Lawrence VanDyke deciding in the majority. Bea wrote the majority opinion, noted the panel tested the prohibition against felons possessing guns in light of Bruen (2022) and found the government...
  • Hawaii Supreme Court Rejects Major Second Amendment Rulings in New Gun-Carry Decision

    02/08/2024 12:26:52 AM PST · by CFW · 66 replies
    The Reload ^ | 2/7/24 | Stephen Gutowski
    The Aloha State’s highest court upheld a man’s gun-carry conviction on Wednesday after rejecting landmark decisions from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). Hawaii’s Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision that found charges leveled against Christopher Wilson for carrying a gun without a permit violated his rights. Instead, the court ruled its state constitution provides no gun-rights protections whatsoever. That’s despite it including a provision protecting the right of the people to keep and bear arms identical to the one in the federal Constitution. “Article I, section 17 of the Hawaiʻi Constitution mirrors the Second Amendment to...
  • In today's gun rights cases, historians are in hot demand. Here's why

    02/05/2024 12:02:45 PM PST · by DallasBiff · 29 replies
    NPR ^ | 2/3/24 | Martin Kaste
    Historians have found themselves caught in the middle of America's debate over gun control ever since the Supreme Court ruled in 2022 that firearms laws must be consistent with American "tradition." That decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen set off a new wave of challenges to state and federal restrictions on guns. "What's happening now is a fight over what the Second Amendment ultimately means," says Chuck Michel, president and general counsel at the California Rifle & Pistol Association, which is suing the state over newly passed limits on concealed firearms. "This truly is a...
  • Federal Judge Blocks Enforcement of ATF Rule Targeting Pistol Braces [1/30/24]

    01/30/2024 6:29:45 PM PST · by CFW · 10 replies
    Epoch Times ^ | 1/30/24 | Jack Phillips
    A federal judge in Florida granted a request for a preliminary injunction to block enforcement of a new federal gun law related to stabilizing braces and whether they convert firearms into short-barrel rifles. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) cannot enforce the rule against individuals who live “in the state of Florida,” U.S. District Judge Mary Scriven wrote in an order this week. In part, the judge wrote that the ATF and other defendants, including Director Steven Dettelbach, were not able to meet the standard of showing that the ATF rule falls under “the plain text of...
  • Submitted Public Comment: California Department of Justice proposes emergency regulations on concealed carry licenses

    12/22/2023 8:24:22 AM PST · by DogByte6RER · 9 replies
    Valley News - A Reeder Media Publication ^ | December 21, 2023 | Rick Reiss
    To Whom It May Concern; The California Department of Justice’s (DOJ) proposed “emergency regulations” regarding the issuance of concealed carry weapons (CCW) licenses smack of complete political hypocrisy and demagoguery, as well as political retaliation against Californians who may disagree with the current policies and leadership within the California State government. The California DOJ’s “emergency regulations” conspicuously leave out a large number of certified firearms instructors, who are affiliated with such gun groups as the National Rifle Association (NRA), the California Rifle and Pistol Association (CRPA), among others. Most, if not all, of these firearms instructors have excellent records in...
  • Awkward: Hunter Biden’s Defense Invokes Gun Rights Ruling 19 Times After Joe Called It Unconstitutional

    12/17/2023 12:02:30 PM PST · by george76 · 12 replies
    The Federalist ^ | DECEMBER 14, 2023 | Tristan Justice
    Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, is relying on Second Amendment arguments that his father once slammed as “deeply” troubling to escape conviction on gun crimes. On Monday, attorneys for the president’s son filed a series of motions to dismiss federal charges handed down by Special Counsel David Weiss. Among the charges Biden’s attorneys want thrown out are firearm charges that were filed on the basis of Hunter Biden purchasing a gun as a drug addict. Hunter Biden’s initial sweetheart plea agreement — which was derailed this summer after it fell apart in court — would have forgiven the felony firearm conviction...
  • Second Amendment NRA torches Biden admin for plan to change rules for gun buyers, sellers

    12/12/2023 7:33:54 AM PST · by Navy Patriot · 14 replies
    Fox News ^ | December 12, 2023 | Emma Colton
    The National Rifle Association lambasted a proposal from the ATF that the gun-rights group says could "unjustly criminalize" Americans for selling a firearm and consequently create "serious confusion" for legal gun owners who engage in firearm transactions. "The Biden ATF's proposed rule, ATF2022R-17, is just another attempt to demolish our Second Amendment rights, with the potential to unjustly criminalize everyday Americans for engaging in lawful firearm transactions," NRA-ILA Executive Director Randy Kozuch exclusively told Fox News Digital in a statement. "This rule blatantly disregards the recent NRA-backed Bruen ruling on the Second Amendment. It also creates serious confusion among lawful...
  • Second Circuit Upholds Injunction on Portions of New York Carry Law

    12/08/2023 6:26:30 PM PST · by CFW · 4 replies
    Bearing Arms ^ | 12/8/23 | Cam Edwards
    Gun owners didn’t get complete vindication from a three-judge panel on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, but the panel did uphold injunctions on several important parts of New York’s “Concealed Carry Improvement Act” in a decision released Friday morning. The state’s default ban on carrying on private property cannot be enforced, according to the court, along with its social media disclosure requirement for concealed carry applicants. The court also ruled that New York’s ban on lawful concealed carry in places of worship cannot be enforced against Pastor Michael Spencer and the members of the Tabernacle Family Church, though other...
  • California Defies SCOTUS by Imposing Myriad New Restrictions on Public Gun Possession

    12/01/2023 2:54:03 PM PST · by E. Pluribus Unum · 20 replies
    Reason ^ | 12.1.2023 3:05 PM | JACOB SULLUM
    By banning firearms from a long list of "sensitive places," the state is copying a policy that federal judges have repeatedly rejected. A California law that is scheduled to take effect on January 1 will impose a host of new restrictions on public possession of firearms. That may seem counterintuitive, since Senate Bill 2 is the state legislature's response to the U.S. Supreme Court's June 2022 ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which upheld the Second Amendment right to carry guns for self-defense outside the home. But California, like several other states with discretionary carry-permit...
  • Federal Court Rules Against Maryland's Gun License Law

    11/21/2023 12:50:34 PM PST · by Navy Patriot · 16 replies
    Newsmax ^ | November 21, 2023 | Charlie McCarthy
    A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled in favor of a gun rights group, saying Maryland's preliminary handgun-licensure requirement is unconstitutional and cannot be enforced. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit ruled in favor of Maryland Shall Issue, which challenged the law, The Daily Record reported. The decision is a victory for gun rights advocates in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen.
  • BREAKING: Federal judge issues partial injunction ahead of Maryland's new carry restrictions taking effect

    09/29/2023 3:24:28 PM PDT · by CFW · 10 replies
    Bearing Arms ^ | 9/29/23 | Cam Edwards
    Maryland’s “can’t carry anywhere” legislation will take effect on Sunday, but a federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction barring enforcement in at least some of the state’s new “gun-free zones.” U.S. District Judge George L. Russell III, appointed to the bench by Barack Obama in 2012, split the baby in his decision; allowing Maryland’s prohibitions on lawful carrying to remain in effect as they apply to museums, health care facilities, state parks and state forests, mass transit facilities, school grounds, government buildings, stadiums, racetracks, amusement parks, and casinos while granting an injunction against enforcement of the new law when...
  • Federal judge halts Colorado gun law, citing Supreme Court Bruen precedent

    08/08/2023 6:51:20 AM PDT · by Twotone · 8 replies
    Washington Examiner ^ | August 7, 2023 | Kaelan Deese
    A federal Judge in Colorado blocked a gun control law that limits the sales of firearms to people 21 and older, holding that it ran afoul of recent Supreme Court precedent. Phillip Brimmer, chief judge for the U.S. District of Colorado, ruled Monday in favor of a firearms advocacy group that sued in order to block the law known as Senate Bill 169. While the law took effect Monday, the judge blocked it from enforcement, ruling it fails the test established in the Supreme Court's 2022 decision Bruen v. New York Rifle & Pistol Association. Overall, voters are slightly torn...
  • Hunter's lawyers cite Bruen in attempt to hold off charges

    06/01/2023 10:02:57 AM PDT · by CFW · 7 replies
    Bearing Arms ^ | 6/1/23 | Tom Knighton
    Whether we agree with the rules around guns or not, we have to decide whether we’re going to follow them or whether we’re going to do no such thing. For some, they’re more than willing to be a test case for challenging gun laws. For others, not so much. Then there’s Hunter Biden. For him, it sure looked like he didn’t care about the laws on the books in pretty much any way, but particularly for the laws regarding the ownership of firearms by habitual drug users. And now he’s facing potential charges for violating that law, as is only...
  • Supreme Court intervenes in Illinois gun bans challenged by firearms groups

    05/02/2023 1:57:07 PM PDT · by absalom01 · 9 replies
    Washington Examiner ^ | ay 01, 2023 | Kaelan Deese
    Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett requested a further response from an Illinois locality after gun rights advocates sued over a recently passed ban on certain firearms.The gun rights advocates are challenging a city ordinance passed last year by Naperville, Illinois, which is similar to an Illinois state law enacted this year barring the sale and possession of certain semi-automatic rifles and magazines. Barrett, who handles appeals stemming from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, asked for Naperville officials to respond by noon on May 8.The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), in conjunction with the National...
  • Review: The History of Bans on Types of Arms Before 1900

    04/25/2023 6:58:05 AM PDT · by marktwain · 11 replies
    AmmoLand ^ | April 24, 2023 | Dean Weingarten
    The History of Bans on Types of Arms Before 1900, by David Kopel and Joseph Greenlee, Law review article, 165 pages, 2021. The Supreme Court, in the seminal Bruen decision, held: once the clear text of the Second Amendment is implicated, the burden falls on the government to prove there were widespread and accepted statutory restraints in history which are very similar to the restraints the government is defending.The law review article by Kopel and Greenlee is the most comprehensive compilation of the laws on ownership and regulation of arms from medieval England through 1900, especially on weapons bans, yet...
  • Federal judge declares "large capacity" magazines not protected by the Second Amendment

    04/20/2023 3:09:56 PM PDT · by CFW · 84 replies
    BearingArms.com ^ | 4/20/23 | Cam Edwards
    A U.S. District Judge in Washington, D.C. has declined to grant an injunction against the city’s ban on “large capacity” magazines, ruling that while magazines in general are “arms” protected by the Second Amendment, LCMs fall outside of the scope of the amendment because they’re a “poor fit” for self-defense purposes. The challenge to the District’s magazine ban, known as Hanson v. D.C., involves four legal gun owners from D.C. who all say that they would possess and carry “large capacity” magazines in their firearms if they weren’t banned by law. The District’s prohibition comes complete with a potential three-year...
  • Ban on marijuana users owning guns is unconstitutional, U.S. judge rules

    02/04/2023 8:15:36 PM PST · by CtBigPat · 75 replies
    Reuters ^ | 02/04/2023 | Nate Raymond
    A federal law prohibiting marijuana users from possessing firearms is unconstitutional, a federal judge in Oklahoma has concluded, citing last year's U.S. Supreme Court ruling that significantly expanded gun rights.
  • Another Federal Judge Rejects the DOJ's Argument That Cannabis Consumers Have No Second Amendment Rights

    04/12/2023 7:56:58 AM PDT · by Twotone · 23 replies
    Reason ^ | April 11, 2023 | Jacob Sullum
    A federal judge in Texas recently agreed with a federal judge in Oklahoma that the national ban on gun possession by cannabis consumers violates the Second Amendment. Kathleen Cardone, a judge on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, also concluded that the federal ban on transferring firearms to an "unlawful user" of a "controlled substance," first imposed by the Gun Control Act of 1968, is unconstitutional. The case involves Paola Connelly, who was charged with illegal possession of firearms under 18 USC 922(g)(3) after El Paso police found marijuana and guns in her home while responding...
  • San Diego judge blocks key parts of California’s strict handgun law

    04/06/2023 7:55:30 PM PDT · by DogByte6RER · 12 replies
    The San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | April 5, 2023 | ALEX RIGGINS
    A San Diego federal judge has issued a ruling that blocks four provisions of California’s strict handgun law, becoming the second U.S. district judge within two weeks to rule that parts of the state’s Unsafe Handgun Act likely violate the Second Amendment. Judge Dana Sabraw’s ruling in the San Diego case could potentially open the door for Californians to purchase hundreds of types of semiautomatic pistols that state officials currently deem “unsafe” and thus do not include on a roster of approved handguns. But the judge issued a stay on his decision, giving Attorney General Rob Bonta time to appeal...
  • Downstate judge strikes down Illinois ban on high-powered guns

    03/04/2023 8:09:48 AM PST · by rellimpank · 25 replies
    Chicago Tribune ^ | 3 -04-2023 | Dan Petrella, Jeremy Gorner and Hank Sanders
    A downstate judge on Friday struck down the ban on high-power firearms and high-capacity ammunition magazines that Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed into law earlier this year, a ruling the Illinois attorney general’s office immediately appealed to the state Supreme Court. The scope of the ruling was a subject of dispute, with the attorney for the state lawmaker who was the lead plaintiff in the lawsuit arguing that it applies statewide and Pritzker’s office contending it does not. “We expected political grandstanding from those more beholden to the gun lobby than to the safety of their constituents and today’s ruling comes...