Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I am No Longer a Dispensationalist
Credo House ^ | May 21, 2015 | C. Michael Patton

Posted on 05/22/2015 4:54:44 PM PDT by OK Sun

My Dispensational Upbringing

I have been taught Dispensationalism from my mother’s womb. I was born in a dispensational environment. It was assumed at my church to be a part of the Gospel. There was never another option presented. It made sense. It helped me put together the Scriptures in a way that cleared up so much confusion. And, to be honest, the emphasis on the coming tribulation, current events that prove the Bible’s prophecy, the fear that the Antichrist may be alive today (who is he?) was all quite exciting. But what might be the biggest attraction for me is the charts! Oh how I love charts. I think in charts. And dispensationalism is a theology of charts!

Making Fun of Dispensationalism

The first time I came across someone who was not a Dispensationalist was in 1999. I am not kidding. It was the first time! I don’t think I even knew if there was another view. It was when I was a student at Dallas Theological Seminary (the bastion of Dispensationalism) and I was swimming with some guys who were at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. Once they discovered I was a dispensationalist, they giggled and snickered. They made fun of the rapture, the sacrificial system during the millennium, and the mark of the beast (which, at that time, was some type of barcode). It was as if they patted me on the head and said “It’s okay . . . nice little dispensationalist.” I was so angry. I was humiliated. I was a second-rate theologian. They were “Covenantalists” (whatever that was). But they were the cool guys who believed in the historic Christian faith and I was the cultural Christian, believing in novel ideas.

(Excerpt) Read more at reclaimingthemind.org ...


TOPICS: Humor; Other Christian; Theology
KEYWORDS: dispensationalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 921-935 next last
To: MHGinTN
And another Scripture for you:

But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ. - II Cor 11:3


421 posted on 05/25/2015 8:59:30 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Selah!


422 posted on 05/25/2015 10:17:12 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Apparently you are basing your argument on the Rapture is not a resurrection...

Not exactly. Resurrection is for dead people. We who are alive and remain will not be resurrected unless we die in the process. I suppose it's possible that the "change" could involve death. It does say that this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality but no mention of death.

We will be in the spiritual kingdom of God...We have no need of blood or flesh
Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
I just wanted to point out that Christ's resurrected body had flesh and bones and maybe blood.

Let me try to clarify. Scripture speaks of just two births, two deaths and mentions a first resurrection. There is no mention of a second resurrection but it is inferable. This is a trinity and the order is always the same. You must be born before you can die and die before you can be resurrected. Also from 1 Corinthians 15:46, always put natural before spiritual. I decided to take this position and see where it leads. You need contradict an interpretation only once to prove it false, to prove it true you must show there are no contradictions, a much more difficult task

The first problem I came across is that I was taught that Adam died spiritually when he ate of the tree in the garden. Spiritual is not first. There are many other questions that arise but over time I like this interpretation more and more. But to your questions;

There are a number of people in the Bible who were raised from the dead. These are types and are prophetic in character. They all had something in common. They are all physical. Even the resurrection of the unjust at the great white throne is physical. But these people are not alive. "I saw the dead small and great stand before God." This it still the first death and the first resurrection. The second death hasn't happened yet - or has it?

Now consider Christ's death and resurrection. They are different. Here it would be nice to have a good definition if death and resurrection. We see what happens to the body but what of the soul and spirit. If physical death leaves us with questions, how much more difficult will it be to understand spiritual death. And resurrection, it appears to reverse death but there is also a change that accompanies it. And spiritual resurrection? Those who are not hurt of the second death will not need a spiritual resurrection and those who go to the lake of fire will not get one.

So, What is different about Christ? Besides being the first resurrection that is permanent, two things happened on the cross that were pertinent to this discussion. Christ was forsaken by the father, something that will never happen to us, and he dismissed the spirit. This leads me to wonder if his death was not merely physical. If this describes the second death then there would have been two resurrections on that first Easter morning. Christ said I have not yet ascended to the father. Natural then spiritual.

Seven
423 posted on 05/25/2015 10:44:22 PM PDT by Seven_0 (You cannot fool all of the people, ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Amen! Thank God!

"Then they that feared the Lord spake often one to another: and the Lord hearkened, and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the Lord, and that thought upon his name. And they shall be mine, saith the Lord of hosts, in that day when I make up my jewels; and I will spare them, as a man spareth his own son that serveth him.Then shall ye return, and discern between the righteous and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth him not." (Malachi 3:16-18)

424 posted on 05/26/2015 12:47:33 AM PDT by mitch5501 ("make your calling and election sure:for if ye do these things ye shall never fall")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

425 posted on 05/26/2015 1:01:28 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

426 posted on 05/26/2015 1:01:29 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; af_vet_1981
I'm sure you have posted something profound, but alas the blue type is too difficult for these old eyes.

HaHaHa...I agree...I don't know if he's posting scripture or something from Betty Crocker's cookbook...

427 posted on 05/26/2015 4:14:21 AM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; xzins
>>Reading from the original Hebrew version of Matthew<<

There is no such thing! We have already established that.

428 posted on 05/26/2015 4:34:52 AM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; metmom; xzins
>>Metmom, you have to be aware by now that none of that garbage you’ve posted has anything to do with Rood or any of his associates.<<

And Rood's prediction of "the day of the Lord" starting in the fall of 2000 was right on target right editor? LOL

429 posted on 05/26/2015 4:36:47 AM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: Iscool; MHGinTN
For all that malign Jacob

Plead my cause, O Lord, with them that strive with me: fight against them that fight against me. Take hold of shield and buckler, and stand up for mine help. Draw out also the spear, and stop the way against them that persecute me: say unto my soul, I am thy salvation. Let them be confounded and put to shame that seek after my soul: let them be turned back and brought to confusion that devise my hurt. Let them be as chaff before the wind: and let the angel of the Lord chase them. Let their way be dark and slippery: and let the angel of the Lord persecute them. For without cause have they hid for me their net in a pit, which without cause they have digged for my soul. Let destruction come upon him at unawares; and let his net that he hath hid catch himself: into that very destruction let him fall. And my soul shall be joyful in the Lord: it shall rejoice in his salvation. All my bones shall say, Lord, who is like unto thee, which deliverest the poor from him that is too strong for him, yea, the poor and the needy from him that spoileth him? False witnesses did rise up; they laid to my charge things that I knew not. They rewarded me evil for good to the spoiling of my soul. But as for me, when they were sick, my clothing was sackcloth: I humbled my soul with fasting; and my prayer returned into mine own bosom. I behaved myself as though he had been my friend or brother: I bowed down heavily, as one that mourneth for his mother. But in mine adversity they rejoiced, and gathered themselves together: yea, the abjects gathered themselves together against me, and I knew it not; they did tear me, and ceased not: With hypocritical mockers in feasts, they gnashed upon me with their teeth. Lord, how long wilt thou look on? rescue my soul from their destructions, my darling from the lions. I will give thee thanks in the great congregation: I will praise thee among much people. Let not them that are mine enemies wrongfully rejoice over me: neither let them wink with the eye that hate me without a cause. For they speak not peace: but they devise deceitful matters against them that are quiet in the land. Yea, they opened their mouth wide against me, and said, Aha, aha, our eye hath seen it. This thou hast seen, O Lord: keep not silence: O Lord, be not far from me. Stir up thyself, and awake to my judgment, even unto my cause, my God and my Lord. Judge me, O Lord my God, according to thy righteousness; and let them not rejoice over me. Let them not say in their hearts, Ah, so would we have it: let them not say, We have swallowed him up. Let them be ashamed and brought to confusion together that rejoice at mine hurt: let them be clothed with shame and dishonour that magnify themselves against me. Let them shout for joy, and be glad, that favour my righteous cause: yea, let them say continually, Let the Lord be magnified, which hath pleasure in the prosperity of his servant. And my tongue shall speak of thy righteousness and of thy praise all the day long.
Psalms, Catholic chapter thirty five, in its entirety,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James

430 posted on 05/26/2015 5:11:47 AM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Hasn’t the first resurrection always been seen as the rapture? Christ the first fruits, and then “dead in Christ will rise first, then we remaining alive...”


431 posted on 05/26/2015 6:57:27 AM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 412 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Have you yet read the Gospel. I tried to offer for you in post 341, as Preached by Jesus, Peter, and Paul. I'm sure your unread lengthy blue passages are profound, but lengthy passages with hidden meanings aren't required. The Gospel is profound yet is simple, so simple even little children hear the truth of it.

Despite being a Catholic or a Mormon, or of some other religion, you too can hear the Gospel and accept it into your heart and be born again from above as Jesus commanded in John 3 when speaking with Nicodemus. Do this simple thing and be saved from the wrath to come and live in His eternity starting as soon as you believe and confess Him with your mouth.

432 posted on 05/26/2015 8:35:52 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; CynicalBear; Buggman
>>Reading from the original Hebrew version of Matthew<<

There is no such thing! We have already established that.

Hey, Buggman, we need you to weigh in on this Michael Rood discussion since it touches on Messianic Christianity. Any thoughts?

433 posted on 05/26/2015 9:14:51 AM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: xzins; editor-surveyor; CynicalBear
I know of Rood. In short (and I'm sorry, E-S), he's a false teacher who operates under false pretenses.

He claims to be a rabbi, but he hasn’t been ordained as such by any Messianic or traditional Jewish organization. He is not recognized by any major Messianic Jewish organization. His only known ordination as a minister comes from The Way International, which has its own problems. He keeps making false predictions on the timing of the Second Coming based on his “corrected” Jewish calendar. He makes extravagant and false claims about the traditional rabbis agreeing with him on various issues.

He relies on a supposed "Hebrew original" of Matthew that is, as far as anyone can tell, just a translation from the Greek with a few novel changes. He also casually tosses out passages of Scripture that disagree with him: Most famously, realizing that having three Passovers in John's Gospel account messes up his rather novel interpretation of the 70 Weeks, Rood has declared--without any scholarly support--that John 6:4 was falsely inserted into the text. That is easily refuted by anyone with even a basic knowledge of the Biblical manuscript data and the early Church fathers, or even with just access to Google.

Here’s a good summary of some of the other problems Rood has.

Or just Google michael rood false teacher

Unfortunately, between the extravagant claims, the garish pseudo-priestly costumes, the Gandalfian beard, and an incredible talent for self-promotion, he’s a lot of peoples’ first taste of the Hebrew Roots / Messianic movement. Most seem to start catching onto the false claims and drift away after a few years, but there’s always someone new who has just heard of him and gets caught up in his cult.

Honestly, First Fruits of Zion is a much better resource for someone trying to understand the Jewish roots of the Christian faith and where the Messianic movement is today.

Shalom

434 posted on 05/26/2015 10:57:25 AM PDT by Buggman (returnofbenjamin.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: OK Sun
Since the article speaks of charts...:)


435 posted on 05/26/2015 11:08:45 AM PDT by redleghunter (1 Peter 1:3-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buggman; editor-surveyor; CynicalBear

Thanks, Buggman. I was hoping you had some insight and background on Rood. I was unaware of him. Your messianic stance makes you a fair arbiter of things messianic, so thanks for the links.


436 posted on 05/26/2015 11:22:33 AM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: smvoice; daniel1212
Dispensationalists believe that the dispensation of the grace of God began with Paul and not before. Eph. 3:2,3,5,6,9.

Not traditional dispensationalists nor the progressive dispensationalists. Only the ultra-dispensationalists believe in two gospels and a later gospel of Grace. The Gospel of Grace began with Christ's resurrection and His commands to preach the Gospel (Luke 24).

437 posted on 05/26/2015 11:41:03 AM PDT by redleghunter (1 Peter 1:3-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Buggman

Thank you, Rabbi.


438 posted on 05/26/2015 11:47:14 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
That the Day of Pentecost does NOT mark the beginning of the Church the Body of Christ, since Paul says HE was given that ministry from Christ, and he wasn't saved until Acts 9, so the Body of Christ could not have begun before then.

So, where exactly do you put the beginning of the Gospel of Grace and the beginning of the Church? Acts 9? Acts 10? Acts 15? or Acts 28? Or after any historical events of Acts? I am curious.

439 posted on 05/26/2015 11:47:58 AM PDT by redleghunter (1 Peter 1:3-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: redleghunter
Shouldn't we take Jesus's word for His Church? He stated in Matthew 16:16 what He would build His Church upon, and then told His disciples later to await the 'comforter' who would instruct them in all things. As soon as Peter began his sermon the day of Pentecost, the evidence of God's Spirit working IN those believing evidences the start of His Church on Earth in the Age/Dispensation of Grace and indwelling of His Spirit. Jesus told the Scribes and Pharisees what is the 'work' God requires, and the filling with Holy Spirit guidance at Pentecost is evidence that what Jesus told the leadership is precisely what God is looking for in this dispensation. Those hearing Peter's sermon believed in their hearts and the Holy Spirit zapped them into His eternity from that moment on in spirit.
440 posted on 05/26/2015 11:53:56 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 921-935 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson