Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Things You're Probably Getting Wrong about Praying to the Saints
Shameless popery ^ | April 20, 2015

Posted on 04/20/2015 1:46:59 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 981-984 next last
To: Grateful2God
Please understand when it's the other way around, that we Catholics defend our beliefs against attack.

Yes; we've ALL seen how effective your tactics are; too.

921 posted on 04/24/2015 12:32:51 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 903 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Second Step:

Conjuring up the dead, as Saul with the Witch of Endor, is forbidden.

922 posted on 04/24/2015 12:33:39 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies]

To: Grateful2God
Later on will come the ubiquitous post that we Catholics are damned to hell with all the non-Christians.

G2G: you are confused...


"One indeed is the universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved, in which the priest himself is the sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose body and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the species of bread and wine; the bread (changed) into His body by the divine power of transubstantiation, and the wine into the blood, so that to accomplish the mystery of unity we ourselves receive from His (nature) what He Himself received from ours." — Pope Innocent III and Lateran Council IV (A.D. 1215)

Therefore, if anyone says that it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole Church; or that the Roman Pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy: let him be anathema. — Vatican 1, Ses. 4, Cp. 1

923 posted on 04/24/2015 12:35:14 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 911 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
Some may engage in that sort of projection (of their own faults upon others) but by and large they can hardly hold a candle to what occurred within Roman Catholicism for long centuries.
    I find the gist of your argument undermines the legitimacy of Protestantism on two fronts
  1. It acknowledges Catholicism is, essentially, visible Christianity for 15 long centuries.
  2. It acknowledges Protestantism was, and presumably still is at least in chunks, antiSemitic, ignoring the experience of Jewry under predominately Protestant Germany in the Holocaust.

And now here it seemed to myself that you had been engaging in "projecting" antisemitism onto "protestants" while failing to recognize what there was of that commonly enough among [Roman] Catholics!

Just wowza' man. The pointing finger has multiple friends curled back pointing towards it's master.

This line of argument reminds me of the proverbial man who said he never beats his wife, and if she dares to say otherwise he will really beat her bloody.

924 posted on 04/24/2015 12:36:07 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 917 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
listen to the Pope when he says...

EVERYTHING!!!!



Oh; I'm sorry. A lot of what popes say or do fails to meet many of our FR Catholic's exacting standards.

925 posted on 04/24/2015 12:37:39 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

** Trying to blame Catholicism for Protestant antisemitism is unpersuasive. **

Ducking and avoiding historical facts is, shall we say, typical of the FRoman Catholics.

Care to address the Bulls provided?


926 posted on 04/24/2015 12:40:56 PM PDT by Gamecock (Why do bad things happen to good people? That only happened once, and He volunteered. R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 918 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Ducking and avoiding historical facts is, shall we say, typical of the FRoman Catholics.

"we" ?

Do you mean like the founder of Protestantism being an unrepentant and vicious antisemite whose Seven Step Program Against the Jews led directly to the Holocaust ?

Care to address the Bulls provided?

Perusing your list, and assuming it is accurate, I see a very mixed bag, so to speak, with Gregory I in 598 CE saying of the Jews "they should in no way suffer a violation of their rights" to Sixtus IV in 1482, after first prohibiting the Inquisition in Spain against the Jews, then folding under pressure (Moslems at war and Catholics needed Spain's army to stop Moslems) and authorizing it.

927 posted on 04/24/2015 1:04:42 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 926 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Like I said earlier, Luther’s Roman Catholics roots were showing.

And he certainly didn’t persecute Jews, like the Papists of his day did.


928 posted on 04/24/2015 1:21:24 PM PDT by Gamecock (Why do bad things happen to good people? That only happened once, and He volunteered. R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 927 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I'll look at one part of your assembled claims;

No, I acknowledge no such thing. We may as well throw out the rest of what you claim I am acknowledging while we're at it, too.

"American" styled Protestant ethic was most chiefly the ethic that a nation was formed under who's laws precluded persecution based upon religion.

It is not mere coincidence that Jews have flourished in the United States.

Still desperate to make the charges of antisemitism stick on "Protestants", while excusing the past offenses prescribed and allowed under Roman Catholicism, eh?

Where's the Protestant Father Coughlin? The KKK maybe? Those latter are less "Protestant" than Coughlin was always a Catholic being as the latter were not formally part of mainstream "Protestant" Churches and were in fact much opposed by a majority. Coughlin, in comparison, kept his official RCC collar regardless if some portion of RCC hierarchy were opposed to (by degree or extent?) some of Coughlin's rhetoric.

Meanwhile, in past history Catholics have at times, with the support of their church --- beat their wives Jews bloody and to death. .

There's not much of that in comparison among American, or else English Protestants.

In Germany, although on highest levels both the Lutheran Church and the RCC were both co-opted by the Nazis, men such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer did more with less (if compared to RC popes) in the end being murdered by the Nazis for his opposition to Nazism.

929 posted on 04/24/2015 1:21:48 PM PDT by BlueDragon (...slicing through the bologna like Belushi at a Samurai Delicatessen...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
Where's the Protestant Father Coughlin? The KKK maybe? Those latter are less "Protestant" than Coughlin was always a Catholic being as the latter were not formally part of mainstream "Protestant" Churches and were in fact much opposed by a majority. Coughlin, in comparison, kept his official RCC collar regardless if some portion of RCC hierarchy were opposed to (by degree or extent?) some of Coughlin's rhetoric.

Yes, I'll grant you the KKK is in the domain of Protestantism, and I notice the similarity where its objects of hatred were both the Catholics and the Jews; odd that. As for Caughlin, well, he kept his collar but lost his show and his audience. There is a judgment, which point Protestantism often muddles, saying, in essence, works do not matter.

930 posted on 04/24/2015 1:51:55 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 929 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Read my post, Elsie. I already anticipated the outdated material and put in the Vatican II position.
931 posted on 04/24/2015 1:52:36 PM PDT by Grateful2God (Because no word shall be impossible with God. And Mary said: Behold the handmaid of the Lord...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 923 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
Meanwhile, in past history Catholics have at times, with the support of their church --- beat their wives Jews bloody and to death. .

There's not much of that in comparison among American, or else English Protestants.

In Germany, although on highest levels both the Lutheran Church and the RCC were both co-opted by the Nazis, men such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer did more with less (if compared to RC popes) in the end being murdered by the Nazis for his opposition to Nazism.

I read a mixing of metaphors, so to speak. The argument of American Protestantism is rather exceptional, and not the experience in other Protestant majority nations, whereas the argument again admits that Catholics span two thousand years, in most of those the only historically viable and visible Christianity.

To not mix, one would compare them in their generations, and see, in the Holocaust that, Protestant America closed its doors to the Jews so they could not escape, German Protestants disproportionally supported the Nazi party, while other Protestants, German or not, saved some Jews by hiding them, and Catholics hid Jews in religious buildings as well as private homes probably doing the most. Some Catholics and Protestants did good works, while others did bad works. The theological difference is, whereas Catholicism requires a state of grace evidenced by works, much of Protestantism rests on but a profession.

932 posted on 04/24/2015 2:35:03 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 929 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Actually, it is fully outside of Protestant confessions, and has long been condemned by majority of the same.

Though most members of the KKK saw themselves as holding to American values and Christian morality, virtually every Christian denomination officially denounced the Ku Klux Klan.

As for Caughlin, well, he kept his collar but lost his show and his audience.

Coughlin did not lose his show due to anyone from within hierarchy the RCC having taken it away from him.

933 posted on 04/24/2015 2:45:45 PM PDT by BlueDragon (...slicing through the bologna like Belushi at a Samurai Delicatessen...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 930 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
And he certainly didn’t persecute Jews, like the Papists of his day did.

He most certainly did persecute the Jews. It seems to me logical you would defend the vulgar and vicious antisemite, sonce he is foundational to the Reformation.

934 posted on 04/24/2015 3:00:27 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon

Comparing Protestants to the KKK is the same as playing the Nazi card.

Time to invoke Godwin’s Law and declare victory.


935 posted on 04/24/2015 3:00:27 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 933 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

You were the one who mixed in bloody wife beatings.

Whereas my foot.

I'm not the one who is effectively blaming Jesus for what Roman Catholics have in past centuries done (and done wickedly) in His name.

Protestant America is not spelled "Roosevelt". Besides, how can you have forgotten Coughlin so quickly? That was his heyday -- when he blamed the Joo-os for communism (like the Nazis did also) etc.

The profession on which Protestant theology rests has place for "works", for one being called By God to good works and to perform those same, albeit not including consideration for those as making one worthy of salvation itself.

Is there anything which you get --->right? I'm tiring of needing to correct your each and every statement while battling also your assumptions as to what I confess to for those statements of your own which I do not bother with...

So far here, your statements to myself have been twisted distortions, omissions, wholesale blame-shifting one after another, apparently coming from *thick* biases comparable to Christian Identity/Stormfront ways of thinking, just Romish/Romanism flavored, instead.

936 posted on 04/24/2015 3:14:37 PM PDT by BlueDragon (...slicing through the bologna like Belushi at a Samurai Delicatessen...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 932 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Comparing Protestants to the KKK is the same as playing the Nazi card.

Time to invoke Godwin’s Law and declare victory.

You how they like (when they are not bashing us) to effectively say that every Christian is "a Catholic", and anyone who has faith in the God of Abraham is thus under themselves and their "pope" yadda-yadda-yadda?


937 posted on 04/24/2015 3:27:29 PM PDT by BlueDragon (...slicing through the bologna like Belushi at a Samurai Delicatessen...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon
So far here, your statements to myself have been twisted distortions, omissions, wholesale blame-shifting one after another, apparently coming from *thick* biases comparable to Christian Identity/Stormfront ways of thinking, just Romish/Romanism flavored, instead.

Am I reading something from Luther here ?

938 posted on 04/24/2015 3:32:26 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 936 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

God doesn’t always expect us to succeed, He expects us to try. It’s Him we choose to please.


939 posted on 04/24/2015 3:58:48 PM PDT by Grateful2God (Because no word shall be impossible with God. And Mary said: Behold the handmaid of the Lord...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 921 | View Replies]

To: BlueDragon

The Council of Jamnia was in a way similar to the Council of Trent. Both were set up by an organized religion in a time of intense crisis to deal with the situation at hand. It is Biblical Studies 101 to understand that the Council of J was in fact designed to understandably re-set the state of Judaism after tremendous upheaval - not just the destruction of the Temple, but of the large numbers of Christian conversations. Indeed, the Council specifically rejected Christian writings as Biblical, as of course at the time many Jews were also believers of Our Lord - seems such a thing today would be absurd, but not so in 90 A.D. Finally, all evidence points to the Septuagint being the largest translation effort in Biblical history (and I’d say even to this day). I doubt they messed up and included Macabees. The Council rejected it, which is their business, but the idea that they were simply “codifying what was in existence” is not true and if it were the council wouldn’t merit a footnote in history.

Back to Trent - of course many of the doctrines in Trent were in direct response to the Protestant growth - for example, not be understated, the inclusion of the “Confiteor” and the Prayers at the Foot of the Altar - all emphasized to counter the idea of Faith alone etc.

God bless,


940 posted on 04/24/2015 4:25:37 PM PDT by Burkianfrombrklyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 981-984 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson