Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Praying of the Rosary Is NOT Bible-Based Teaching
The Disciplers ^ | 2011 | Ptr. Vince

Posted on 03/24/2015 8:06:07 AM PDT by RnMomof7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 921-928 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator

To: Seraphicaviary; CynicalBear
Catholics call it a hypostatic union... oh, but that is not in the Bible, so you will not believe it.

;-)

And by the same token, "Trinity" is not in the Bible..

222 posted on 03/24/2015 2:54:25 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Discuss the issues all you want but do not make it personal.

Read the guidelines on my profile page by clicking on my name at the bottom of this post.

Open threads are in a town square format.

Antagonism though not encouraged, should be expected

Posters may argue for or against beliefs, deities, religious authorities, etc. They may tear down other’s beliefs. They may ridicule. “Open” RF debate is often contentious.

It requires thick skin. A poster must be able to make his points while standing his ground, suffering adverse remarks about his beliefs - or letting them roll off his back.

Members of religions which are as much culture as belief sometimes take religious debate personally. If you keep getting your feelings hurt because other posters ridicule or disapprove or hate what you hold dear, then you are too thin-skinned to be involved in “open” RF debate. You should IGNORE “open” RF threads altogether and instead post to RF threads labeled “prayer” “devotional” “caucus” or “ecumenical.”


223 posted on 03/24/2015 2:55:26 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Seraphicaviary
If you are going to use arguments from Catholic thought, then you need to use them as Catholics understand the word

That's the heart of the problem: the words have but one meaning. Roman Catholicism tries to change what they mean to conform to a non-biblical doctrine.

When I pray for someone, or they pray for me, I am praying to God...not Mary. She's not omniscient; she hears no prayer. Only The Almighty does.

Hoss

224 posted on 03/24/2015 2:56:43 PM PDT by HossB86 (Christ, and Him alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

That happens when you get a Master of Arts in Catholic Philosophical Studies.


225 posted on 03/24/2015 2:57:06 PM PDT by Seraphicaviary (St. Michael is gearing up. The angels are on the ready line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Seraphicaviary
Catholics call it a hypostatic union... oh, but that is not in the Bible, so you will not believe it.

The RCC, as do many cults, teach much that is not remotely referenced in the Holy Bible, even in parables of Jesus.

Your worship group, as do other apostate groups, has many unBiblical and unique usages of words and phrases, when translated from the Latin.
226 posted on 03/24/2015 2:59:51 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Seraphicaviary
That happens when you get a Master of Arts in Catholic Philosophical Studies.

A sincere waste of your time and effort and somebody's money if you still adhere to false doctrines after your "much learning".
227 posted on 03/24/2015 3:01:32 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

“using a simple memory device to say certain prayers in a certain order is forbidden in the Bible?”

Saying “certain prayers in a certain order” actually is addressed in the Bible, and referred to as “vain repetitions”. Prayers should come directly from a person’s heart and mind, thereby making a “memory device” unnecessary. Fondling beads is just weird. (And don’t they kiss the beads, too?)

People think that parroting The Lord’s Prayer is praying, too, when it was meant to be more of template. We weren’t told to “pray this prayer”; instructions were to pray in this “manner”.


228 posted on 03/24/2015 3:02:08 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Frequently when taking stock of my own words and actions I ask myself if I am in violation of Christ’s greatest commandment. It is simple in theology but difficult in practice, as we observe on many of these religious threads.


229 posted on 03/24/2015 3:04:47 PM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Why not just call this the anti-Catholic thread and be done with pretense that this is about anything else? That’s what it always looks like.


230 posted on 03/24/2015 3:05:16 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: HossB86
I see no difference, in terms of "one mediator," between asking the "living" for their prayers and asking the "dead" for their prayers

Not quite. Actually you've wandered a little off the path of logic.

Please reread the entirety of my earlier post before you make any more accusations. I addressed the rest of what you wrote beforehand, in what I wrote about "the dead," and here I was especially careful to include "in terms of 'one mediator'" right in the middle in order to avoid misreadings.

Mary is dead; in Heaven no doubt, but NOT omniscient; asking you friend to pray for you is reasonable; that person, properly, would be praying to GOD on your behalf; not to Mary.

See the difference?

Not in terms of "mediatorship"--at least in terms of how the earlier conversation was going in terms of what was being called asking someone, such as Mary, "to pray for us" to God.

I'm not talking about something like thinking of or addressing Mary (or someone else along these lines) as anything like a deity in her own right, whatever form doing so may take in prayer or similar practices. (I'd even say that praying to someone else as if he or she were a deity would go even beyond the mediatorship question: in other words, the "recipient" would be even more than such a mediator would be.)

(I'm not Catholic, but one would probably also say that a saint in heaven doesn't need to be omniscient to hear requests to pray for us. I see such a discussion as on-topic within the greater context in this thread, but I'm not debating either way beyond pointing out, as I did earlier, that it's harder to find scriptural justification for asking for their prayers than to find clear justification for asking the living for their prayers.)

As I wrote earlier, I'd still say that there are stronger objections than using "one mediator" in this fashion.

231 posted on 03/24/2015 3:05:17 PM PDT by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: All
Steeple Song 

I don't care how many buses you own
Or the size of your sanctuary
It doesn't matter how steep your steeple is
If it's sittin' on a cemetery
I don't care if you pave your parking lot
Or put pads upon your pews
What good is picture perfect stage
If you're missin' all the cues?

I don't care if your pastor's super-powered
And your program's always new
What you need is love and truth
And men are going to come to you
It doesn't matter that you know the Bible
If it's all just in your head
The thing I need to ask you is
Have you done the things I said?

Do you love your wife?
For her and for your children
Are you layin' down your life?
What about the others?
Are you livin' as a servant to
Your sisters and your brothers?
Do you make the poor man beg you for a bone?
Do the widow and the orphan cry alone?

I don't care if you pray for miracles
I don't care if you speak with tongues
I don't care if you said you love Me
In every song you've sung
It doesn't matter that your sacrifice of praise
Is loud enough to raise the dead
The thing I need to ask you is
Have you done the things I said?

Repeat Chorus

Lord, when were You a prisoner
That we did not come to You?
When was it that we saw You sick
That we didn't follow through
Every time you turned your head
And pretended not to see
When you did it not to the least of these
You did it not to Me

Words and music by Don Francisco © 1979 New Spring (Admin. by Brentwood-Benson Music Publishing, Inc.)

Maybe you and your church fit in here. Try the shoe on...

232 posted on 03/24/2015 3:06:10 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Religion Moderator

Will you be having a bash the Jews thread too?


233 posted on 03/24/2015 3:06:19 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse
It is simple in theology but difficult in practice, as we observe on many of these religious threads.

Yes. In all of life. Sometimes we're tired or frustrated and BANG, the tongue engages without the brain. One of man's great failings. My MiL told me to never pray for patience. :-)

I'm as guilty as anyone else.

Proverbs 15:1

A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.

234 posted on 03/24/2015 3:10:23 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Seraphicaviary

Dedicating themselves to Mary? I’ve dedicated myself to Christ alone. Put whomever you want in His place but don’t expect happy times.


235 posted on 03/24/2015 3:10:51 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Will you be having a bash the Jews thread too?

Troublemaker. Disrupter.

You really are itching to sling those fists and kick against those goads aren't you.


236 posted on 03/24/2015 3:11:00 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7

That’s nice.

A paraphrase.

How’s it superior to the original?


237 posted on 03/24/2015 3:12:36 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

No. I don’t post threads that mock the faith of others. I don’t see that as the Christian thing to do.


238 posted on 03/24/2015 3:12:37 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Seraphicaviary
>>He got his human qualities (Catholics say “nature”) from Mary and his Divine qualities from God the Father.<<

So she is the mother of Jesus not the mother of God. Finishing with invectives is not a strong scriptural basis.

239 posted on 03/24/2015 3:12:38 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Discuss the issues all you want but do not make it personal.


240 posted on 03/24/2015 3:15:16 PM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 921-928 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson