Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unpaid Mormon Leaders Get a Pretty Sweet Deal [So-called 'unpaid' bishops get $100,000 in benefits!]
Mormon Coffee ^ | Jan. 31, 2013 | Sharon Lindblum

Posted on 01/31/2013 5:05:06 PM PST by Colofornian

Late last year (2012) a copy of the 2006 Mission President’s Handbook was posted on an individual’s blog site. This document, produced by the Mormon Church as a practical instruction manual for mission presidents, “contains basic policies and guidelines established by the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles to help you lead your missionaries and direct the work” (6). The book is not intended for general readership; “general” readers have found that it contains some things that are surprising in light of the public face that the Church puts forth.

PaycheckOne such surprise is found in Appendix B, Family Finances. It begins,

“While you are serving as mission president, the Church reimburses the necessary living expenses for you, your wife, and your dependent children. Dependent children are defined as those who are under age 26, have not been married, and are not employed full-time. Living expenses include food, clothing, household supplies, family activities, dry cleaning, personal long-distance calls to family, and modest gifts (for example, Christmas, birthdays, or anniversary).” (80)

Additional reimbursable or paid expenses are also listed including (but not limited to) medical expenses; support for children serving full-time missions; dance lessons (and the like) for elementary and secondary school-aged children as well as their school tuition, fees and books; undergraduate college tuition; a gardener; a housekeeper; internet and other utilities; babysitters; transportation expenses including the use of a car and all fuel and maintenance expenses; and personal health and life insurance premiums.

The handbook instructs,

“The amount of any funds reimbursed to you should be kept strictly confidential and should not be discussed with missionaries, other mission presidents, friends, or family members.” (80)

One can only speculate about the reasons for this confidentiality among friends and family. But the mission president is also instructed to keep mum about these financial benefits to the taxman.

“Because you are engaged in volunteer religious service, no employer-employee relationship exists between you and the Church. As a result, any funds reimbursed to you from the Church are not considered income for tax purposes; they are not reported to the government, and taxes are not withheld with regard to these funds…

“To avoid raising unnecessary tax questions, please follow these guidelines closely:

“Do not share information on funds you receive from the Church with those who help you with financial or tax matters. Any exceptions should be discussed with the Church Tax Division.

“Never represent in any way that you are paid for your service.

“If you are required to file an income-tax report for other purposes, do not list any funds you receive from the Church, regardless of where you serve or where you hold citizenship.” (82)

Eric Johnson and Bill McKeever did some calculations on a hypothetical mission president serving in the state of Utah. This imaginary Mormon Church leader ended up with benefits equaling $99,500 per year. Furthermore, Eric Johnson writes,

“It must be mentioned that tithing on these items are not supposed to be paid. Unlike other church members, this family can receive temple recommends without paying tithing on “income.” Hence, for the value of this compensation, which we list here at almost $100,000, the tithe amount would be at least $10,000. So, this particular mission president—who, remember, is considered a “volunteer”—is getting compensation for at least $110,000! Not bad for someone who is not supposedly getting a wage!”

Indeed.


TOPICS: Ministry/Outreach; Other non-Christian; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: benefits; bishops; inman; lds; mormon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-174 next last
To: ravenwolf

Mormons use the fact that they claim “lay” clergy instead of paid ministers to convince people that they are the true Christian church.

That is the reason this stuff gets posted. It is to inform possible converts that the story being told my missionaries is half true at best.


101 posted on 02/01/2013 9:41:57 AM PST by pennyfarmer (Your socialist beat our liberal AGAIN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: WilliamRobert
Do not use potty language, or references to potty language on the Religion Forum.

Do not accuse other Freepers of telling lies; it attributes motive, the intent to deceive. It is "making it personal."

Do not accuse other Freepers of hatred. That is mind reading, it is also "making it personal."

Discuss the issues all you want, but do not make it personal.

102 posted on 02/01/2013 10:14:51 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: pennyfarmer

Mormons use the fact that they claim “lay” clergy instead of paid ministers to convince people that they are the true Christian church.

That is the reason this stuff gets posted. It is to inform possible converts that the story being told my missionaries is half true at best.


I understand, the point i am trying to make is that if this were the state of Israel more than two thousand years ago these people who are getting paid would be called levites and they would be getting a share of the tithe, they would be public servants.

The levites were the only ones God gave the authority to collect tithes, the writings of the Apostles do not once mention having that authority, they only took donations.

The early Christians who wanted to be servants of God sold every thing they had and gave to the Church , they lived off of the church in common with the others who did the same.

The tithe collecting churches of today are more what jesus set us free from to begin with except there are hundreds of them now instead of just the one.

So if they want to fight about which one is the most apostate then i guess it should not bother me, so i should just say let them go at it.


Mormons use the fact that they claim “lay” clergy instead of paid ministers to convince people that they are the true Christian church.

Then they do know that if they were the true Christian Church,( which they are not ) they would not be taking money for serving God, which by the way was my point.


103 posted on 02/01/2013 11:37:40 AM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
Well good luck, mayby i will start thinking of sacraficing my life to the Lord also if it pays that good.well; maybe the pay ain't THAT good; but I've heard the benefits are outta this world!
104 posted on 02/01/2013 11:44:43 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Yep, I’m aware that the Catholic Church considers it “The One True Church”.

That’s why I frown upon all the other pretenders who make the same claim.

Cheap azz imitation that can be found at Chinese purveyors on Canal Street in Manhattan.


105 posted on 02/01/2013 2:46:34 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; All
They claim all their leaders are “unpaid”

Your OP says the Mission President is "reimbursed" for expenses. And goes on to clearly show the person is not an employee. Ok.

No where in the article does it say they receive a salary.

So, they are telling the truth, they are not paid. Reimbursement is paying for the goods or service first, you produce a receipt, and are given the money back as a gift in return.

I can only guess if those numbers are correct, then someone would have to have $100K+ in the bank per year they serve. Half a million to a million dollars in the bank, just to serve if the Church didn't reimburse? That's not a reasonable expectation.

Your OP is hyperbolic nonsense.
106 posted on 02/01/2013 3:06:52 PM PST by MeOnTheBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
I admit its bigotry. I am bigoted agains those who corrupt my Saviors message. I am also bigoted against leftist, communists, democrats Muslims and anyone else who firecly wants to alter what is good and true in the world as well as those who support such activites and groups.

Romans 12:14
14 Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.

1 Corinthians 13:4
4 Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,

1 Peter 3:9
9 Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.

Matthew 5:44
44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;


So you're a Christian? Follower of Jesus Christ? I don't think that "following" in this context means just walking behind him...
107 posted on 02/01/2013 3:23:11 PM PST by MeOnTheBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Vendome
Yep, I’m aware that the Catholic Church considers it “The One True Church”.

How and why do they make this claim?
108 posted on 02/01/2013 3:30:32 PM PST by MeOnTheBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

well; maybe the pay ain’t THAT good; but I’ve heard the benefits are outta this world!


Yeah, but which direction outta this world we talking about?


109 posted on 02/01/2013 4:23:13 PM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: MeOnTheBeach

According to the Catechism, the Catholic Church professes to be the “sole Church of Christ”, which is described in the Nicene Creed as the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.[2] The church teaches that its founder is Jesus Christ, who appointed the twelve Apostles to continue his work as the Church’s earliest bishops.[3] Catholic belief holds that the Church “is the continuing presence of Jesus on earth”,[4] and that all duly consecrated bishops have a lineal succession from the apostles.[5] In particular, the Bishop of Rome (the Pope), is considered the successor to the apostle Simon Peter, from whom the Pope derives his supremacy over the Church.[6] The Church is further described in the papal encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi as the Mystical Body of Christ.[7] Thus, the Catholic Church holds that “the one Church of Christ which in the Creed is professed as one, holy, catholic and apostolic ... This Church constituted and organized in the world as a society, subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the Bishops in communion with him.”[8] Furthermore, the Church holds that “The Catholic Church alone... is the font of truth, this is the house of faith, this is the temple of God; if any man enter not here, or if any man go forth from it, he is a stranger to the hope of life and salvation….Furthermore, in this one Church of Christ, no man can be or remain who does not accept, recognize and obey the authority and supremacy of Peter and his legitimate successors.’[9]

The Church teaches that the fullness of the “means of salvation” exists only in the Catholic Church, but the Church acknowledges that the Holy Spirit can make use of Christian communities separated from itself to “impel towards Catholic unity” and thus bring people to salvation in the Catholic Church ultimately. It teaches that anyone who is saved is saved through the Catholic Church but that people can be saved ex voto and by pre-baptismal martyrdom as well as when conditions of invincible ignorance are present,[10] although invincible ignorance in itself is not a means of salvation.

You can read more about other religions feelings of superiority here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_true_church


110 posted on 02/01/2013 6:23:45 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: MeOnTheBeach
How and why do they make this claim?

How?

By claiming they wuz the FIRST.

Why?

See above.

111 posted on 02/01/2013 6:57:41 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
Yeah, but which direction outta this world we talking about?

Unkown; as the Book tends to be quite vague on the details.


1 Corinthians 2:9
However, as it is written: "No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him"--
 
 
 
 
Isaiah 65:17
 "Behold, I will create new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind.
 
 
 
 

112 posted on 02/01/2013 7:01:28 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

1 Corinthians 2:9
However, as it is written: “No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him”—

Isaiah 65:17
“Behold, I will create new heavens and a new earth. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind.


Right, this world is not our home, we are just passing through.


113 posted on 02/01/2013 7:46:08 PM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: MeOnTheBeach

I walk with him, I also fight for him as we are commanded to do against the darkness and its’ false teachings. The all paths Oprah school of Christianity nor any of the Cults such as the LDS have not destroyed the entire faith yet.

But thanks for the concern all the same.


114 posted on 02/02/2013 8:52:47 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MeOnTheBeach; handmade; WilliamRobert; Dan(9698); All
No where in the article does it say they receive a salary.

Listen, for many Lds leaders on the take, there's no essential difference between, say $50,000 worth of annual "stipends" and a salary...For more on this, which, btw, includes 70 Lds presiding BISHOPricsS, see: How many church leaders receive a 'Stipend'

So, they are telling the truth, they are not paid. Reimbursement is paying for the goods or service first, you produce a receipt, and are given the money back as a gift in return.

Are you serious? Did you read the article? There's not a whole lot of positions where the following is taken care of 100%:

Living expenses include:
* food,
* clothing,
* household supplies,
* family activities,
* dry cleaning,
* personal long-distance calls to family,
* and modest gifts (for example, Christmas, birthdays, or anniversary).”
* support for children serving full-time missions;
* dance lessons (and the like) for elementary and secondary school-aged children as well as their school tuition, fees and books;
* undergraduate college tuition; a gardener; a housekeeper;
* internet
* utilities;
* babysitters;
* transportation expenses including the use of a car and all fuel and maintenance expenses;

That's beyond the normal "benefits" of med expenses, which are also covered 100%...and I don't know of a whole lot of "jobs" where employees don't have to pay out a co-pay for those...the "mission prez" positions involve 100% med coverage...

115 posted on 02/02/2013 2:29:16 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian
Listen, for many Lds leaders on the take, there's no essential difference between, say $50,000 worth of annual "stipends" and a salary.

I come from a corporate background. How do you know it's $50K? Or are you making that up? What is the stipend for? Is it for ecclesiastical work or is it for other things? Do they travel? Are they expected to go on the road on Church business?

If they are doing actual business work, such as building upkeep, grounds maintenance, accounting work, which is out side any ministerial work, then stipend makes sense. That's considered being considerate to those being burdened on your behalf. I see it all the time in the business world.

I followed the link you provided and read the following:

The big problem with this thread is that the leaders in question don't actually get their "stipend" from TITHING. They get it from the Churches business operations.

This doesn't support the argument you're trying to make.

That's beyond the normal

Normal by what standard? Are they some how not free to decide their own benefits?

From everything I've seen so far, I don't see the problem. They are not making a profit. It's a zero-sum-gain. They are getting reimbursed for out of pocket expenses.

So basically....when the Mormons ask someone to serve, they bend over backwards to make sure they are taken care of and not over burden by what's asked of them. That's pretty commendable. Especially when you consider how most organizations seem to treat their people these days.

It brightens me a lot to see this type of thing. Kind of reminds me of Catholic charities; Seventh Day Adventists hospitals, etc... There's still a lot of good going on out there.
116 posted on 02/02/2013 11:02:35 PM PST by MeOnTheBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
I walk with him, I also fight for him as we are commanded to do against the darkness and its’ false teachings. The all paths Oprah school of Christianity nor any of the Cults such as the LDS have not destroyed the entire faith yet.

But thanks for the concern all the same.


I find the hypocrisy of these words to be astounding. You calling the LDS church a cult reminds of me of an event in the Bible. Peter thought he was fighting for the Lord when he drew his sword and cut the ear off a Roman. Jesus rebuked Peter and then He put the Roman's ear back on and healed him[the Roman].

Jesus strictly forbade lashing out at people. Jesus gave strict warnings to people who think they are with Him, but in reality are not. They don't behave the way He said they should. They don't, in reality, do what He told them to do. No matter what people claim to believe, if they are not strictly doing what Jesus commanded them to do...They will be cast out.

I mean those are the words of Jesus Himself.

IMO, anyone that lashes out at other people, lacks charity. And anyone lacking charity will never see the inside of heaven. Because there are no mean people in heaven.
117 posted on 02/02/2013 11:57:01 PM PST by MeOnTheBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: MeOnTheBeach

I saw your posts on the JW thread, and see you defending the LDS here, be it out of some misguided brotherhood of cults, membership or ignorance matters not.

These “organizations” have trapped good people in their grips and should be treated accordingly. Those so trapped should be freed by any means possible. Those who enable these cults, their operators and manipulators who care little if anything for faith just the filthy lucre they see in front of them must be addressed as the false teachers they are.

The is no hypocrisy in the truth.

Since you seem prone to Bible verses here are a few.

Book of Jude
22 Be merciful to those who doubt; 23 save others by snatching them from the fire; to others show mercy, mixed with fear—hating even the clothing stained by corrupted flesh.

“The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron...If you point these things out to the brothers, you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus, brought up in the truths of the faith and of the good teaching that you have followed” (1 Timothy 4:1-2,6).

“’I know that after I leave, savage wolves will come in among you and will not spare the flock. Even from your own number men will arise and distort the truth in order to draw away disciples after them. So be on your guard! Remember that for three years I never stopped warning each of you night and day with tears” (Acts 20:29-31).

Galatians 1
6 I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel— 7 not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. 8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. 9 As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.

1 Timothy
19 Do not admit a charge against an elder except on the evidence of two or three witnesses. 20 As for those who persist in sin, rebuke them in the presence of all, so that the rest may stand in fear.

We were never told to treat the Devil and his agents lightly, just those whom he has misled if at all possible, but if we must snatch them from the fire then so be it.

These Cults are prime examples of that.

I have seen you ask others their faith but never reveal yours as best I can tell. To make this easy I will tell you I am a Methodist by membership albeit it a very conservative one since I also spent many years in the Orthodox Church, and still attend certain services there.


118 posted on 02/03/2013 12:39:42 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

So how does your home church support itself, if no one gives?
How do you support the poor, the hungry, the needy, your missions, your youth if no one gives?


119 posted on 02/03/2013 8:08:52 PM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MeOnTheBeach

Shhhh.... you will ruin their self-righteous ranting with facts.


120 posted on 02/04/2013 6:59:41 AM PST by Capt. Canuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson