Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NIV Bible Error Lucifer AND Jesus are ONE in the NIV
2010 | bibletruth

Posted on 11/28/2010 4:13:46 PM PST by bibletruth

NIV Bible error - Lucifer AND Jesus are ONE in the NIV. See Isaiah 14:12.


TOPICS: Theology
KEYWORDS: bible; correctdoctrine; idiocy; illiterate; kjv; logicalfallacy; niv; niverrors; scholarslie; stretch; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 361-373 next last
To: evangmlw
" Because salvation is based on one’s relationship with Christ and Christ alone! "

BINGO !!!


161 posted on 11/28/2010 9:13:14 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: evangmlw

How do you know what Gospel the Church teaches? How much time have you spent in a Catholic Church? To state that God did not lead me to the Catholic Church takes some bold presumption on your part. To presume that you know the mind of God and how he speaks to me personally and through his Word is dangerously sinful. And I say that with love for you and for your soul.

I have already went against my own advice and allowed myself to be caught up in a circular arguement. So I will end this now. God bless.


162 posted on 11/28/2010 9:28:26 PM PST by Lil Flower (Confucius says: Wise man never play leap frog with unicorn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: bibletruth

I simply read the chapter a bit further on. No big mystery or taking anyone’s word over the Scripture.


163 posted on 11/28/2010 9:34:33 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Officially evangelical type churches are not considered ‘churches’ in the proper sense,” Dominus Iesus, 2000), though they are considered separated brethren as long as they baptized and are ignorant that Rome is the one true church, which she declares she is, but which requires submission to her to be assured of [salvation].

This is exactly why the Catholic church is wrong on all doctrine in the Bible regarding Grace Salvation and In Christ Truths:

Characteristics of a cult:

1) They claim to be the **true** church. Dominus Iesus, 2000: they are considered separated brethren as long as they baptized and are ignorant that Rome is the one true church

2) If a person leaves the **true** church they risk eternal damnation in hell. requires submission to her to be assured of [salvation]

3) They have an anointed hierarchy. a Pope, which is forbidden by Matthew 23:9 and Exodus 20

4) This hierarchy regardless of how corrupt is impervious to reform by action of the common laity.

5) Salvation is through the ministration of the **true** sacraments by their **true** priesthood. Of course if a member leaves the true sacraments and true priesthood he is in danger of eternal damnation. Christ alone is our High Priest - Hebrews 7:22-25

164 posted on 11/28/2010 9:40:05 PM PST by bibletruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: bibletruth
the only pride going on here is men on this page who trust scholars words above God’s Word...

Well, gee, Perfessor, it's good we've got you to learn us good, then.

KJV-onlyism is to Christian theology what pro wrestling is to sports.

165 posted on 11/28/2010 10:22:23 PM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bibletruth

What i meant by “requires submission to her to be assured of” was not salvation, concerning which Rome teaches that works done by grace are meritorious for salvation (Trent), but that of assurance that Rome is what she claims to be, as only by faith in Rome’s formulaic assured infallibility can man have doctrinal assurance. Fallible human reasoning can be appealed to, but once one becomes a a Catholic it is taught that he is not to question Rome’s infallible teachings (though it is not known what all may be included as such) or search the Scriptures to determines their validity.

As concerns cults, #4 is foundational, as a typical mark of such is that of effectively making a man or an office the supreme doctrinal authority on earth, rather than the Scriptures, which is the only objective source which we are assured are wholly inspired of God, (2Tim. 3:16) and thus assuredly infallible. And this is not restricted to Rome, or Mormonism, etc, but churches who censure those who dare sincerely question doctrines and practices which are allow for some degree of debate.

Those who hold to the supremacy of Scripture cannot hold that they are infallible, but are bound to substantiate their case by the Scriptures, and the manner of doctrinal exegesis it overall manifests. And thus we agree with Rome on certain core essentials, such as is written in the Nicene Creed, while being in opposition to those which fail of Scriptural warrant, and are contrary to it.

In addition, the authenticity of true men and churches of God is not based upon self-declaration and or formal lineage, but is established by holiness, doctrine and the power of God which conforms to that which is written, which Scriptures themselves become established as being such due to their heavenly qualities. Good night.


166 posted on 11/28/2010 10:24:11 PM PST by daniel1212 ( ("Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out," Acts 3:19))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL
The NIV is based upon the Catholic "Latin Vulgate"

LOL. And on that hilariously inept note, can we ignore anything else you say as equally sloppy and inaccurate research?

167 posted on 11/28/2010 10:25:51 PM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SENTINEL
BTW, what version do you suppose the KJV translators borrowed the Latin word "Lucifer" from?
168 posted on 11/28/2010 10:29:51 PM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Nope, just challenging assumptions of those who claim final authority.

Lol. While you yourself are claiming final authority. You are a parody of yourself and you look rediculous.

169 posted on 11/29/2010 1:54:01 AM PST by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: sportutegrl

“Son of the morning” means ‘morning star’.


170 posted on 11/29/2010 2:46:26 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bibletruth; irishtenor

RE: No need to pray for me

When one makes a statement like that it manifests the sin of pride, as if one is sinless and perfect.

Despite that, we are commanded to pray for each other by our Lord and Savior, so I will.


171 posted on 11/29/2010 4:09:09 AM PST by big'ol_freeper ("[T]here is nothing so aggravating [in life] as being condescended to by an idiot" ~ Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: evangmlw

RE: Sure, it’s really difficult to think that an all wise God would set absolute truth on paper so that man wouldn’t be able to corrupt it with his heresy and error.

LOL...as evidenced by the congruity of espoused “Truth” generated by Christians who hold that the Bible is the only source of Truth. Wow. < /sarcasm>


172 posted on 11/29/2010 4:14:57 AM PST by big'ol_freeper ("[T]here is nothing so aggravating [in life] as being condescended to by an idiot" ~ Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: bibletruth
you're right and wrong. Right -- the verse should read as
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations?
This is as it is in the Douay-Rheims authorized translation which is correct.
"O Lucifer"... O day star. All this, according to the letter, is spoken of the king of Babylon. It may also be applied, in a spiritual sense, to Lucifer the prince of devils, who was created a bright angel, but fell by pride and rebellion against God.

173 posted on 11/29/2010 4:43:12 AM PST by Cronos (Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (And the word was made flesh, and dwelt amonst us))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver; bibletruth
"Are you a heretic"

Well, I've seen bibtut's posts where he argues that churchs with a large number of people are false and truth is to be found for the seekers in small groups only. To me it does reek of gnosticism (a group that seeks esoteric knowledge denied to others and has such strange beliefs as thinking that the God of the OT is just a demiurge and Jesus is of a "Higher" God)
174 posted on 11/29/2010 4:53:45 AM PST by Cronos (Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (And the word was made flesh, and dwelt amonst us))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: onedoug; bibletruth

“Create evil”... The evils of afflictions and punishments, but not the evil of sin.


175 posted on 11/29/2010 5:01:09 AM PST by Cronos (Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (And the word was made flesh, and dwelt amonst us))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer
While you yourself are claiming final authority.

Nope, that seems to be your role in your attempt to stop anyone from questioning the OP. At that, the only thing you seem to bring to most threads is this usual banter.

176 posted on 11/29/2010 5:21:20 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: evangmlw

I thought your church was this one because this is what I got when I googled.

http://www.rockycreekonline.org/index.htm

The link is to a church in Greenville, SC

Are your churches the same? Do they preach the same thing? Why the same name?


177 posted on 11/29/2010 5:28:33 AM PST by Not gonna take it anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: evangmlw

I read the anti-Catholic rant on the website.

http://www.rockycreekbaptist.org/Catholicism.html

It seems obvious to me that no one there has ever read anything about Catholicism on their own. They are just regurgitating anti-Catholic screeds that they have heard from others.

At least have the intellectual honesty to research for yourself.


178 posted on 11/29/2010 5:32:33 AM PST by Not gonna take it anymore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
... but not the evil of sin.

Which comes from the human mind...which God created too.

179 posted on 11/29/2010 5:34:45 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr; bibletruth; Salvation; wagglebee; Petronski; Judith Anne; Deo volente; dsc; narses; ...
Go back to basic studies.
The crown of the Morning Star is simply one of many titles. At one time, indeed Lucifer was so crowned.
In the future, that same title will be given to a different person.
The title doesn’t imply the 2 people are the same


Good point. Just because a title is similar sounding or even if it was used for something/someone else earlier, it does not tie in that Jesus = lucifer
180 posted on 11/29/2010 5:37:32 AM PST by Cronos (Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (And the word was made flesh, and dwelt amonst us))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 361-373 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson