Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kriggerel

Stop and think about it, how would a cyber security firm come to this conclusion without having access to the actual machines that counted the votes with the software that was loaded on them for each election.

IOWs, the company would need unfettered access to the actual machines installed in 2020 and full access to their software, to undergo the type of tests needed to determine if an intrusion happened, then you would need the same thing for the machines installed in 2022, which are likely different machines running different versions of the code.

I could be wrong, but I’m not aware of any confiscation of voting machines in Arizona for the 2020 or 2022 elections.

Meanwhile, you have voter rolls in Arizona that are continually dirty with thousands of voters listed as eligible that are not and who should be removed. Those fraudulent voters are sent ballots, those ballots are gathered up by Democratic front groups, filled out and dropped into unguarded drop boxes with no way of knowing those votes are real or fraudulent.


3 posted on 03/25/2024 3:31:12 AM PDT by srmanuel ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: srmanuel

Excellent observation. It benefits the cheaters to no end to maintain false names and indelible voting lists. Party operatives can collect the fraudulent ballots and cast votes with them. And no one will rule against this! In close elections, the party operatives only need to hold back enough ballots to swing the election.


11 posted on 03/25/2024 4:03:13 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: srmanuel

I was struck by the same thing. How would these investigators get their hands on one or more closely guarded machines?


15 posted on 03/25/2024 4:31:00 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“When exposing a crime is treated like a crime, you are being ruled by criminals” – Edward Snowden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: srmanuel
Here's a thought: Imagine an individual with a thumb drive used to update the software in a tabulator where it assigns a value of .9 for every Republican vote and a value of 1.1 for every Democrat vote.

After 200 votes are cast, 100 went to the Republican and 100 went to a Democrat. A tie

However, by the the altered value of the vote, the altered total shows 110 votes for the Democrat and 90 for the Republican.

Unless a manual recount of the ballots was held, nobody would realize that the totals were altered within the system.

20 posted on 03/25/2024 5:03:48 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: srmanuel

Getting Hot Out There in Election Fraud Land

The People are closing in

ELIZABETH NICKSON | MAR 21, 2024

 


Is Arizona going to the Supreme Court? The Court is rumoured to want an election fraud case. It can’t ignore this very much longer. No one is letting go. Everyone observing thinks the judge will quail, because he will be ruined and under threat by the cartel that owns Arizona. If Lake loses her signature battle - which she shouldn’t - this was straight up fraud - it doesn’t matter. We’re in an incremental battle.

These people, the forces on the now-bonkers left, devised their successful program in 2002 with four billionaires, and for twenty years they have been accruing power, building their system straight out to fraud and selling out to the cartels and WEFers. At some point along the way, the power they built went haywire and began to eat the culture.

What that has triggered is a tsunami of citizen activism. Not the astroturf of the corporate left or international socialist left, but the real thing. We’re tracking everything. Spy on us, we will gut your data.


Excerpt. Read more at Welcome to Absurdistan

23 posted on 03/25/2024 5:42:18 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson