Excellent observation. It benefits the cheaters to no end to maintain false names and indelible voting lists. Party operatives can collect the fraudulent ballots and cast votes with them. And no one will rule against this! In close elections, the party operatives only need to hold back enough ballots to swing the election.
“Kari Lake and Mark Finchem Add Cybersecurity Experts’ Testimony About Newly Discovered ‘Artificial Control’ over the Tabulation of Ballots Using Electronic Voting Machines to their SCOTUS Appeal”
Meanwhile, a lot of people obsess over the voting machines as being the main source of cheating, while basically ignoring all the obvious ways cheating is actually happening.
Think about it, if 2-4% of the votes are fraudulent in a close election, you could go to 100% hand counting of votes and the outcome would not change.
Agreed. I’m curious as to the progress made (or not) in cleaning up voter rolls in AZ.