[Hot Tabasco]

Here's a thought: Imagine an individual with a thumb drive used to update the software in a tabulator where it assigns a value of .9 for every Republican vote and a value of 1.1 for every Democrat vote.

After 200 votes are cast, 100 went to the Republican and 100 went to a Democrat. A tie

However, by the the altered value of the vote, the altered total shows 110 votes for the Democrat and 90 for the Republican.

Unless a manual recount of the ballots was held, nobody would realize that the totals were altered within the system.

[srmanuel]

That is possible, but think about it, using a thumb drive to update software on multiple voting machines to change the outcome of the election.

How many voting machines are used in just one major county like Maricopa in Arizona, hundreds at a minimum, how many would have to be hacked to alter the outcome of the election as you suggest, compared to 2-4% of the votes are fraudulent, because voters rolls are not properly maintained, mail in voting exists combined with ballot harvesting, the fraudulent votes are harvested and turned in as valid and no judge anywhere will invalidate them.

Under my scenario, the way the votes are counted is immaterial because they should both produce the same result.

[Renfrew]

“Unless a manual recount of the ballots was held, nobody would realize that the totals were altered within the system.”

A manual recount was held. Focusing on the voting machines is a trap designed by the deep state to hide the real crime.

The only way to cheat is to add fake ballots to the vote stream.