Listen Live: Supreme Court hears case on 'insurrection,' Trump eligible to be president again

Just the News ^ | 2/8/24 | staff

[CFW]

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday morning on whether former President Trump is eligible to be on the 2024 presidential ballot. Listen Live

[1Old Pro]

Who put this Woman that keeps asking Stupid and incomprehensible questions on this court??

One of the libs, they are noticeably upset that this case is being argued.

[Bishop_Malachi]

“....State for being Members of a Political Party that actually COMMITTED AN INSURRECTION. See 1861...”

________________________________________________

You wouldn’t even need to go back that far. Any Dems that lent aid and comfort to the BLM/Antifa riots of 2020-2021 should be targeted.

[1Old Pro]

Kagan talking now

[Tennessee Nana]

I plan to vote for President Trump next Wednesday, Feb 14 the 1st day of early voting in TN...

Hes on our ballot...

TRUMP 2024 !!!

[Tennessee Nana]

Im listening online about 1 minute behind Toby TV

[Tymesup]

Discussion didn’t sound like it is going to be a 9-0 decision.

Discussion was civil, unlike cable debates where everybody shouts until the commercial break (and make dinner plans with the other kabuki players.)

[Jim Noble]

The SC has no such power to decide this. Eff em no matter their decision.

+1

Granting cert and hearing Bush v Gore has created a century of future mischief.

The process of appointing Electors and separate voting by Electors in State capitals was DESIGNED ON PURPOSE to exclude the national government from potential draining of the swamp by the People in their States.

They thought of everything.

[eyeamok]

After 10 minutes of listening, I am convinced we need a Major National Campaign to REPEAL the 19th Amendment.

[mad_as_he$$]

I have been listening also. Third and long... oh wait wrong forum!

Law can be incredibly boring and dry.

I agree with other posters Trump - SCOTUS has no standing here.

[Ronaldus Magnus]

Trump’s attorney is getting rolled by the liberals. They keep pushing him to a progressively more narrower argument. Alito has been trying to help him take his blinders off, but he refused. Threading through ancient precedents seldom persuades the Supreme Court when they are dealing with pressing issues.

[Tennessee Nana]

Called off because of rain

[V_TWIN]

“Discussion didn’t sound like it is going to be a 9-0 decision”

Nope.....no way

[j.havenfarm]

I’m keeping my marker down on 9-0 on narrow grounds. A decision the other way would lead to electoral chaos on many ballot levels. Remember the decision has already been made. Not at all surprising that the appearance of doubt would be intentionally sown so as to assuage the rabid leftists in the public

[1Old Pro]

They keep pushing him to a progressively more narrower argument.

In an obviously aggressive confrontational demeanor.

[Right Brother]

Since the ratification of the 19th, the country has been on a slow path to destruction.

[Tennessee Nana]

Brown is yelling and arguing trying to confuse the issue

[bantam]

I can see Roberts, ACB, and Kavanaugh all going against Trump!

[Alberta's Child]

Bush v. Gore was a legitimate case for the Federal court system based on the clear violations of Voting Rights Act provisions there.

The court got half that case right — the decision on the merits of the legal challenge. The court went off the rails with the remedy in that case, not the merits.

[who knows what evil?]

Couldn’t agree more.

[DOC44]

Liberal females are dominating the time and have already made up their minds that they are going to vote against Trump. Court will rule 6 to 3 or maybe 5 to 4. All three of the three identifying as maybe female. The black female is letting her black attitude shine...