[Jim Noble]

The SC has no such power to decide this. Eff em no matter their decision.

+1

Granting cert and hearing Bush v Gore has created a century of future mischief.

The process of appointing Electors and separate voting by Electors in State capitals was DESIGNED ON PURPOSE to exclude the national government from potential draining of the swamp by the People in their States.

They thought of everything.

[Alberta's Child]

Bush v. Gore was a legitimate case for the Federal court system based on the clear violations of Voting Rights Act provisions there.

The court got half that case right — the decision on the merits of the legal challenge. The court went off the rails with the remedy in that case, not the merits.

[Fury]

The process of appointing Electors and separate voting by Electors in State capitals was DESIGNED ON PURPOSE to exclude the national government from potential draining of the swamp by the People in their States.

But a question regarding the 14th Amendment is justicable, moreso with State governments relying in part in Section 3.

[StAnDeliver]

"Granting cert and hearing Bush v Gore has created a century of future mischief."

You cannot be unaware Bush v Gore was a legitimate SCOTUS decision reeling in a rogue state supreme court, as SCOTUS has done in the past, and not unironically will do so at present by overturning Anderson, et al v Griswold, CRSCC, Trump, et al; or do you support this Colorado rogue state supreme court decision?