Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Even House Democrats Think Emperor Biden’s $600 IRS Bank Spying Plan Is Bonkers So They’re Proposing a New Number
NOQ Report ^ | 09/27/2021 | JD Rucker

Posted on 09/27/2021 9:13:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Joe Biden wants to know how much money is coming in and out of your bank accounts. His plan is to require banks report all transactions of more than $600 whether coming in or going out. It was billed as a way to fight tax evasion, which is ironic since Biden himself was accused of evading his own taxes last week. But the truth is the regime wants to keep tabs on everyone’s money to make sure nobody has any the government can’t get their grimy fingers on.

According to Katabella Roberts from our premium news partners at The Epoch Times:

Democrats have said they plan to raise the threshold of President Joe Biden’s radical proposal that all bank transactions of more than $600 be reported to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

The initial proposal (pdf)—which Biden says is aimed at curbing tax evasion—would require banks and other financial institutions to report to the IRS any deposits or withdrawals totaling more than $600 annually to or from all business and personal accounts.

The new reporting requirement would take effect in 2022 and would apply to both private individual and commercial business accounts owned by a taxpayer.

But House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal said Thursday that he and other Democratic leaders are planning to scrap the $600 annual figure and set a higher threshold, of which the details are still being worked through.

“We’ve reached an agreement to not have the $600,” Neal told Bloomberg. A Democratic aide noted that they are focusing on increasing the current threshold to $10,000 but said that this figure could well change.

The huge gap between what the Biden-Harris regime wants and what Democrats in the House will be proposing tells us just how outrageous the original plan is. This is financial spying, nothing more. They want us to believe it’s only about tax evasion, but they will never mention the other risks of having our purchases and receipts monitored by Big Brother.

As government grows to gargantuan levels, it’s clear the nanny state is quickly becoming the police state. Giving such forced visibility to the IRS means the reporting burden on both banks and the agency will expand. The bigger problem isn’t with today’s IRS, though. The real concern is how this data can be weaponized by a near-future IRS that operates within the rapidly forming police state.

To say we’re seeing the formation of Big Brother would be an understatement. Even George Orwell couldn’t imagine the draconian future that is being built right before our eyes.




TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 4thamendment; bank; california; democrats; infrastructure; irs; nancypelosi; policestate; privacy; spying; surveillance; taxhike
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Red Badger

That pesky 4th Amendment. If only Democrats gave a rip about the Constitution.


21 posted on 09/27/2021 9:34:23 AM PDT by JaguarXKE (Liberalism is a cancer on our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy

No, it’s an annual report of any and all transactions over whatever the number is.

And still unacceptable at any level.


22 posted on 09/27/2021 9:35:19 AM PDT by moonhawk (Biden: Not my President. Fauci: not my doctor. Me: not their bitch. You:???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Even $100K+ is unconstitutional....................

Unless your an expat, then the threshold is $0.00.

23 posted on 09/27/2021 9:35:57 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Once agin, the biggest threat to “Democracy” in the USA id the Democrat Party under Biden


24 posted on 09/27/2021 9:37:39 AM PDT by realcleanguy (quickly things are falling apart, now that the )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Even $100K+ is unconstitutional....................

****************

The GOP may not vote for it but they probably won’t do anything to rescind it either. The GOP totally LOVES big government. Note that they never do anything to shrink it.


25 posted on 09/27/2021 9:38:25 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal

“They already report every transaction over $10K.”

I had to get approval from the bank branch manager to with draw $2,000. in cash. Guy wanted than amount IN CASH for the boat I was buying from him. Moved several Ks to another bank.


26 posted on 09/27/2021 9:38:51 AM PDT by DOC44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: minnesota_bound
They want the camel’s nose (IRS/democrat party members) in the tent which is your bank account.

The camel's nose went in the tent many years ago when our courageous leaders allowed the IRS to access any expats Bank Accounts outside the US. No one seemed to care about that outdated piece of paper written by old white men then. Why should they now?

27 posted on 09/27/2021 9:38:56 AM PDT by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

To even suggest a negotiated threshold is wrong and is to give credence to the incredible.

Just say NO.

Children and more laws and regulations. Far to many of both in giverment now.


28 posted on 09/27/2021 9:40:07 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Politicians are only marginally good at one thing, being politicians. Otherwise they are fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

People making $15/hr earn $600 gross per week, so even “minimum wage workers who are a bit frugal could easily snag the Xiden tripwire.


29 posted on 09/27/2021 9:45:47 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DOC44
"I had to get approval from the bank branch manager to with draw $2,000. in cash"

You need a new bank, that one isn't working for you. They are treating your money like it is not yours but the government's.

30 posted on 09/27/2021 9:52:43 AM PDT by WMarshal ("Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
And to think our nation was born of a revolution sparked by taxation at a time when there were no income taxes, and only import taxes that amounted to about 10% on goods. Even with the Stamp and Townshend Acts the amount of taxes on colonists was minimal compared to today.
31 posted on 09/27/2021 9:53:24 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It won’t be long before we’re each assigned our own political officer to watch us 24/7.


32 posted on 09/27/2021 9:55:12 AM PDT by GaryCrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I agree. ANY monitoring violates the 4th Amendment. ANY!! They have no valid grounds for monitoring bank accounts whatsoever. The Democrats are trying to sound “reasonable” by setting a higher number while still violating the Constitution.


33 posted on 09/27/2021 9:55:38 AM PDT by JWNM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How ‘bout stop spying on people’s finances comnpletely?
If a ‘penumbra’ of the First Amendment can protect pre-natal infanticide on privacy grounds, they it should protect bank accounts as well.

“The First Amendment has a penumbra where privacy is protected from governmental intrusion,” the Court said. “While it is not expressly included in the First Amendment, its existence is necessary in making the express guarantees fully meaningful.”


34 posted on 09/27/2021 9:56:32 AM PDT by Little Ray (Civilization runs on a narrow margin. What sustains it is not magic, but hard work. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Whether it is $600 or $10,000, this is still spying by the IRS on the personal business of each of those affected, and is thus utterly unacceptable. If they have reasonable cause to believe that someone has cheated on their taxes, then they should get legal authorization to examine that person’s financial records. Just letting them do it is a complete violation of the 4th Amendment.


35 posted on 09/27/2021 9:57:48 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JWNM

Put Swiss banks on indian land next to the casinos. Then put market driven hospitals on the other. Problem solved.


36 posted on 09/27/2021 9:59:31 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Any number >= $0 is ridiculous.


37 posted on 09/27/2021 10:03:14 AM PDT by edh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And they’ll pass it and nobody, even all of us on here, will do a dam thing about it.

Oh we will bitch and moan and all that. But that is as far as it will get.

Want and solution to this?

Secession. Start a new republic.


38 posted on 09/27/2021 10:04:32 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

Keep following the logical conclusion ... people will revolt, pull their money out of banks, leading to collapse. Cloward-Piven strategy. They’re already collapsing immigration, health care, energy. Why not finance?


39 posted on 09/27/2021 10:04:39 AM PDT by AT7Saluki (No cejar, no ceder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is nothing more than a tool for the government to go after its political enemies. Every person in the U.S could be invested without a warrant. And if they dont like you, they WILL find something.


40 posted on 09/27/2021 10:06:52 AM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson