Posted on 04/30/2020 11:45:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
Leftist leaders of the environmental movement are attacking far Left filmmaker and Bernie Sanders supporter Michael Moore, trying to destroy the progressive documentarian for honestly pointing out the green energy scam is nothing more nor less than crony capitalism disguised as the planets salvation in his new film, Planet of the Humans, released on YouTube for free viewing on the 50th anniversary of Earth Day.
Produced by Moore and directed by his long-time collaborator Jeff Gibbs, the film exposes the facts that green energy cant prevent climate change, and those saying it can are profiting handsomely from government green energy subsidies and mandates.
The movie shows, for example, solar panels are made with metallurgical coal and require 16 times more materials in the form of cement, glass, and steel than do nuclear plants, and create 300 times more waste.
Renewable fuels are produced using tractors that run on diesel, use water pumped by electricity, most often from fossil fuel power plants, and are delivered to distilleries powered by electricity with trucks fueled by diesel. And the crops used to make bio-fuels use millions of gallons of water annually and require the conversion of 400 to 750 times more landdepending upon the crop grown to produce the fuelto produce an equivalent amount of petroleum.
Aside from showing the green energy emperor has no clothes, Moore and Gibbs also skewer green energy profiteers. For instance, billionaire Elon Musk, whose company has benefited greatly from millions of dollars in federal tax credits for electric cars and state property tax abatements for his factories, brags his Gigafactory battery manufacturing plant in Nevada is powered 100 percent by renewables. Gibbs shows it is hooked up to the electric grid, relying on natural gas for much of its power.
The film shows Al Gore, the political godfather of climate alarmism, raked in approximately $100 million when he and his co-owner of Current TV sold the channel to Al Jazeera, a network funded by the government of Qatar, whose operations are largely funded by oil and gas revenues and whose citizens have the largest per capita carbon footprint in the world. Simultaneously, Gibbs shows Gore, his billionaire corporate investment fund cronies, and environmental groups including the Sierra Club, promote and are profiting from biomass burningcutting down and burning trees often mixed with used tiresto replace coal for electric power generation. This emits as much or more carbon dioxide and even worse toxic pollutants into the atmosphere than coal.
When Gibbs examined a supposed green energy investment fund, the Green Century Fund recommended by Bill McKibbens 350.org, he found less than one percent solar and wind and 99 percent things like mining, oil and gas infrastructure, a tar sands exploiter....
Gibbs explained in an interview with Breitbart, neither Moore nor he had intended to challenge the effort to replace fossil fuels with renewable power. Instead, they wanted to understand why it hasnt been more successful. Instead of dark forces and moneyed interests suppressing green energy, they found corporate interests were behind and profiting from policies subsidizing and mandating renewables, and renewables actually require the use of fossil fuels.
It turned out the wakeup call was about our own side, Gibbs told Breitbart. It was kind of crushing to discover that the things I believed in werent real, first of all, and then to discover not only are the solar panels and wind turbines not going to save us these technologies were just another profit center.
For the sin of telling the truth about the Lefts green energy fantasies, environmental leaders are attempting to undermine Planet of the Humans and halt its viewing.
Climate realists have long described the tremendous virtues of fossil fuels when compared to renewable energy sources, including in the authoritative Climate Change Reconsidered II: Fossil Fuels. Realists have also repeatedly pointed out the high environmental and human health costs produced by green energy, as in a recent paper by The Heartland Institute, Policy Brief: How The Green New Deal's Renewable Energy Mining Would Harm Humans And The Environment, which examines the horrendous toll on human health and the environment produced during the mining and refining of minerals critical for wind, solar, and battery power. Coming from conservatives, the mainstream media has largely ignored this researchit goes against their liberal bias. Thats why Moores Planet of the Humans is dangerous; it comes from one of their own.
Although I havent often agreed with the messages Michael Moore and Jeff Gibbs have promoted in their past films, Planet of the Humans is spot on. Green energy is bad for the environment, the economy, and human freedom. To Moore and Gibbs, in the immortal words of celluloid hero John McClane, I say, Welcome to the party, pal!
Two thumbs up for Michael Moore. Never thought I’d say that, but the documentary (after 10 minutes of watching) is a straight-shooter.
***I never knew about burning trees for green energy that was new to me***
Back in the 1970s MOTHER EARTH NEWS proposed power plants that burned wood. They figured it would take 25 square miles of trees to keep a power plant going.
Wonder if they figured in the cost of cutting, chipping and hauling the wood, along with replanting fast growing trees.
I was going to ask if that was a Freudian slip, to be sure I the context exactly right I did a search, check out the Wikipedia entry on the right hand side of the screen
https://www.bing.com/search?q=freudian+slip&form=QBLH&sp=-1&pq=&sc=0-0&qs=n&sk=&cvid=95B0D7513E594772B549E7AD6C063E02
bkmk
I prefer the original. What a great typo!
The great hope is that he’ll be spit in the face and kicked around so bad by tge Left, that he’s spend the rest of his life exposing them and retaliating against their global-crony-creep backers. Good. Bring it on.
The latter would be more beneficial to the environment... and society.
Sooner or later fossil fuels are going to run out. That will drive up the price as it happens so the alternatives will then become profitable. It's a problem that will solve itself , no grand government controlled scheme is necessary.
lol
he has lost quite a bit of star power over the years.
Attention and money, even from those on the right, he will take.
Oh, don't I wish.
If the greenies really wanted to get us off “fossil fuels,” they would support nuclear energy. It’s the only thing that can even begin to replace these fuels and maintain the power supply we need, while preserving energy independence.
Instead, Reactor 2 at Indian Point was turned off today.
Crony capitalism isn’t capitalism; it’s a form of socialism.
Is ANYTHING promoted by liberals/marxists good for anything, except enriching themselves or controlling other people?
Does anyone remember when one of his movies premiered in DC and the DC Chapter FReeped it? He actually came over and talked to us for a couple of minutes.
Exactly
That is why the author falsely blames capitalism where cronyism is what was at fault here.
All of those wood burning/junk burning power plants were paid for by tax payers for cronies to generate power that they profit from. That is cronyism, because capitalism said it was a dumb idea and wasn’t profitable.
Does anyone remember when one of his movies premiered in DC and the DC Chapter FReeped it? He actually came over and talked to us for a couple of minutes.
That is actually kind of cool of him to do that.
Instead, Reactor 2 at Indian Point was turned off today.
I have no problem with old nuclear plants going off line, there has to be a life span to a plant
I have a problem that we are not building new modern safer cleaner plants to replace them
“Sooner or later fossil fuels are going to run out.”
Can’t be too soon. First should go are the wind mills, then the Solar panels (except for roof tops). Both take too much of productive fields and make America ugly for no good reason. We need that land to feed our expanding population.
Most of the true forest management companies like Weyerhaeuser are in it for the long haul. So, yes they plant 3 trees for every one they cut down.
Then they go back in 15-20 years and selectively cut to leave the trees that are growing faster and straighter.
They also take the seeds from the biggest fastest growing trees. These seeds are used to replant the “crop”.
The difference is the crop take anywhere from 35-65 years to grow to a harvestable size.
FYI, the Southern Yellow Pines species of trees(there are technically four) are the fastest growing commercially harvestable timber resource in the wood. They grow from VA south to Florida and west to Texas/Oklahoma and Arkansas.
This SYP is the least expensive wood fiber on the planet.
This is why many of the southern sawmill companies have been purchased by the large North American softwood corporations like Canfor, West Fraser, Interfor, Potlatch/Deltic, Resolute and Tolko. The industry is consolidating.
The medium size companies are getting bought by the big corporations that have sawmills, paper mills, osb plants and other engineered wood products.
In the world, not wood.
I really need to proof read, before I hit post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.