Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gowdy: Because Comey Let Clinton Off, He Likely Won't Face Charges for
Townhall.com ^ | April 23, 2018 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 04/23/2018 10:58:56 AM PDT by Kaslin

According to the Department of Justice Inspector General, fired FBI Director James Comey is under investigation after leaking classified information to a friend last year, who then passed it along to a reporter. The information was contained in a series of memos written by Comey after meetings and phone calls with President Donald Trump.

But despite what the law says about disseminating classified information, Comey may not face conseqences. According to House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, Comey may have saved himself thanks to the exoneration of Hillary Clinton.

"Not by the standard he set in the summer of 2016. God knows how hard it would be to win that case," Gowdy said in response to a question about whether Comey broke the law. "Remember, he ignored the statute that says 'grossly negligent.' He now has a requirement that it has to be intentional and you have to do it to harm the United States. So under the standard that he set in summer 2016 with Secretary Clinton, I don't think Jesus could win that case."

Rep. Trey Gowdy on fallout from release of Comey memos

The release of the memos last week came after Gowdy and a number of leading Republicans threatened the FBI with a subpoena for failing to turn them over by an earlier deadline.

"We have long argued former Director Comey's self-styled memos should be in the public domain, subject to any classification redactions. These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not," Gowdy released in a joint statement with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes. "Former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch."

An inspector general report about how the FBI and Obama DOJ handled the Clinton email scandal is due to be release any day.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: andrewmccabe; christopherwray; classified; classifiedinfo; fbi; fbidirector; jamescomey; leaks; lisabarsoomian; michaelcohen; perjury; rodrosenstein; sidebarabuse; steeledossier; treygowdy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last
To: Kaslin

Shut up and leave, Trey, you pecker head.


81 posted on 04/23/2018 12:47:37 PM PDT by chris37 ("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

It’s not an excuse it is WHY he is retiring. He cannot prosecute and the DOinJ is just that.


82 posted on 04/23/2018 12:55:43 PM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Comey doesn’t get to set the standard.

The standard is justice. The system must meet it.

And for the system to produce justice Comey must go to jail, along with the rest of the conspiracy.


83 posted on 04/23/2018 12:56:10 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Not by the standard he set in the summer of 2016. God knows how hard it would be to win that case,” Gowdy said in response to a question about whether Comey broke the law. “Remember, he ignored the statute that says ‘grossly negligent.’ He now has a requirement that it has to be intentional and you have to do it to harm the United States. So under the standard that he set in summer 2016 with Secretary Clinton, I don’t think Jesus could win that case.”

Gowdy is worthless as tits on a boar.

Any competent prosecutor could win a conviction based on the law as written.

Gross Negligence is the standard.

But Comey went beyond that and INTENTIONALLY disclosed Secret/NoForn information.

That’s an easy conviction.


84 posted on 04/23/2018 12:57:16 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

No joke. Comey does not have the authority to make law or reach an interpretation of the law inserting an element that DOES NOT EXIST. Furthermore, a potential defendant does not get to make the law.

The FBI, the agency responsible for protecting classified information, must be fuming because using this standard just about ANY prosecution for mishandling classified information could not be charged.

Bizarro world.


85 posted on 04/23/2018 1:03:00 PM PDT by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
James Comey is not a judge and the case was never litigated. How can there be a precedent? Even if possible, how can Comey be the person who set the precedent that would keep himself from being prosecuted? This is ridiculous!
86 posted on 04/23/2018 1:06:28 PM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Exactly! The guy is useless!


87 posted on 04/23/2018 1:16:45 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gowdy argues like a defense attorney, even worse, a public defender. This guy that so many of us respected, including me, deserves none. Gowdy is a crook.


88 posted on 04/23/2018 1:22:02 PM PDT by Gator113 ( ~~Trump 2020~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gowdy is an absolute moron. Comey violates the law to cover up for Hillary. And now Gowdy claims that this is the new legal standard that protects Comey.

Laughable.


89 posted on 04/23/2018 1:24:10 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hillary has not been charged or tried.

Just because one policeman (Comey) is crooked and ignores the law, does not mean that the next policeman in line should not arrest and charge.


90 posted on 04/23/2018 1:26:23 PM PDT by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I can only hope Gowdy is being sarcastic.

The only precedent Comey set was that FBI Directors get fired for illegally usurping DoJ authority regarding prosecutorial decisions.

Comey sent his classified memos to a co-conspirator with a plan to leak them covertly, with the stated intention of causing appointment of a Special Counsel. A smarter woman than Comey, HRC presented herself as ignorant of all technical knowledge north of flushing a toilet (though she had people for that), creating reasonable doubt that she had any idea what she was doing. (Portraying yourself as too stupid to form criminal intent might have been an unwise choice for a Presidential candidate, but she was very credible as a drooling idiot). Comey the egoist made his intentions clear as a bell.


91 posted on 04/23/2018 1:33:14 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gowdy: “Not by the standard he set in the summer of 2016. God knows how hard it would be to win that case,” Gowdy said in response to a question about whether Comey broke the law. “Remember, he ignored the statute that says ‘grossly negligent.’ He now has a requirement that it has to be intentional and you have to do it to harm the United States. So under the standard that he set in summer 2016 with Secretary Clinton, I don’t think Jesus could win that case.”

I guess I don’t understand what Gowdy is saying here. Is he implying that Comey establishes the intent of the law?


92 posted on 04/23/2018 1:40:36 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honcho Bongs
Gowdy is “controlled opposition” just like Darryl Issa and Jason Chaffetz.

Folks have started do notice, which is why he's history.

93 posted on 04/23/2018 1:42:37 PM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito

Oops, now I read the thread and it seems I’m not alone in my problem with Gowdy’s statement.


94 posted on 04/23/2018 1:42:46 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m not sure but I think that was Trey’s lame attempt at sarcasm.


95 posted on 04/23/2018 1:43:11 PM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

James Comey’s interpretation of his evidence is not the law. Statutes mean something. And knock it off with the blasphemy Gowdy.


96 posted on 04/23/2018 2:23:20 PM PDT by Blogger (The causes are the left are never about caring about an issue. ItÂ’s always about power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled

^5


97 posted on 04/23/2018 2:52:16 PM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Honcho Bongs

“Gowdy is “controlled opposition” just like Darryl Issa and Jason Chaffetz.”

The law firm, academic institution, consulting firm, or lobby organization Gowdy joins when he leaves office will give us a clue as to who Gowdy’s controller is today.


98 posted on 04/23/2018 3:00:46 PM PDT by Soul of the South (The past is gone and cannot be changed. Tomorrow can be a better day if we work on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Yes. Who proclaimed Cardinal Comey the arbiter of all standards?

Gowdy sickens me more and more. At least he admitted his seven years were wasted.


99 posted on 04/23/2018 3:32:45 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Thanks!


100 posted on 04/23/2018 3:33:04 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson