uh huh. whatevs.
This is a VERY dangerous situation Obama put us in. He DID use the Brits to spy on Trump. But the GCHQ is basically a subsidiary of our NSA. We pay them $100 million a year. And we share critical intel with them. But that system was critical compromised by Obama’s corrupt move, and now this is a crisis in the system. Reason #938 why Obama belongs in jail.
There are 3 other countries that exchange intel. Try them. Also the US helps to pay the lbthq budget for some reason.
Weeks after the election? How about before the election?
It is not illegal for another country to listen in on other coutries citizens.
Soooooo...obama asked, and recieved, from the British equivalent of the NSA. M-whatever. all of their surveillance on Trump.
Probably in exchange for the NSA surveillance of who knows who in British Government...PM? the Queen?
I did not say your mom was fat. I said I heard my cousin’s friend say your mom was fat. Also, I will never say your mom is fat again.
“the allegations would not be repeated, “
If they don’t repeat it enough it will go away?
prisons are full of innocent people
I WAS FRAMED
does anyone think british intel doesn’t spy on us govt officials...???
is it coincidence that mc cain got his golden shower report from media via an ex british intel officer...
In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
“US has agreed not to repeat claims”
Spicer “repeated” claims voiced by a journalist/commentator, Judge Napolitano.
Like “Fight Club”, the first rule of secret US-UK intel sharing is “you don’t talk about secret US-UK intel sharing”.
Trump was given a choice of talking about it, or not having any in the future.
Whether info fell over the transom about what was requested and done, and by whom, or if the British IC is internally denying anything occurred, is something we are unlikely to learn, ever.
I think this- It happened, we know it happened, we have said it but we won’t talk about any more.
There are three sources on this in the CIA. I want a full and complete congressional investigation with Bands Display subpoena power! Some one is LYING!!
The Brits are right. GCHQ was not asked to "conduct wiretapping."
According to Judge Napolitano, they were asked to look in the massive database of telecom and internet communications that had already been gathered by the NSA, covering the entire country, which GCHQ has access to, and pull out the Trump communications for Obama.
One has to carefully parse these denials as if they are being made by Clinton.
Reminds me of a line from Hee Haw, something like “You’ll never hear me repeating gossip, so listen carefully the first time”
Who is the US? SOS? DOJ? POTUS? Congress?
And we believe the denials of spies because . . . ???
I say they were caught with hand in cookie jar.
Right... the White House will no longer say that the entity “GCHQ” directed the surveillance. BECAUSE:
GCHQ gets 24/7 raw surveillance from the NSA, and ANYONE, working in or as a “sideline” (which of course NO-one does at GCHQ or in the MI-5 (can you say Mr. Steele of “dossier” fame) in order to forward their role as double agents for a foreign government— can you say, Russia or China, hmmmmmm?)
The reason the WH will not say it, is that the PM and Trump talked, and GCHQ is no doubt doing as they have ALWAYS had to do— look for moles rife in their secret services, which has to be done, literally everytime we “share” with them. And this “sharing” allowed Brennan, and Morell and Panetta ,working for obamaumao “who dind kno nuffin (BS)” to sift and target surveillance info for use of the Clinton campaign, the DNC and to keep their jobs in the assumed Clinton “win”
. Let’s see, what is the Brit history?: The Cambridge 5, George Blake, Abwehr agents from WWII who turned out to be Soviet doubles working for Stalin, Klaus Fuchs,Alan Nunn May, etc.). Additionally,UK officials, including experts at its MI5 intelligence agency, are fearful that China could shut down businesses in the nation with Chinese cyber attacks and spy equipment embedded in computer and telecommunications equipment. Canada (a part of the Brit Commonwealth who answer to the Queen, lest we forget) has estimated there are at least 1000 chi-com spies in the country. And, uh, Canada most likely has access to the GCHQ “shared” NSA. Which would fit rather nicely, the modus operandi of the Clinton Foundation in obtaining 20% of the US uranium through Frank Giustra- Canadian mining exec, and Board member of their Foundation, laundering the money through Canada (which is what happened).
See how this can happen? And it’s not false flag— which would be designed to turn our intel inside out. It’s directed and intended political illegal action by Mr. Brennan at the behest of his “religion” and the Muslim Brotherhood (found in large numbers in the UK and... Canada).
So, yes the proper correction is not to say anymore, that GCHQ did it- in accusatory fashion. But the wheels and worm is turning. And one worm is on the run, wife-free, to be with his french iranian/russian nuclear pals. imho.