Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Schumer says he has ‘serious concerns’ about Judge Gorsuch after meeting
New York Daily News ^ | 02/07/2017 | Cameron Joseph

Posted on 02/07/2017 2:14:27 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he has "serious concerns" about Judge Neil Gorsuch after meeting with the Supreme Court nominee on Tuesday — and struggling to get straight answers from him.

"The judge avoided answers like the plague. This president is testing fundamental underpinnings of our democracy and its institutions. These times deserve answers and judge Gorsuch did not provide them. I have serious, serious concerns about this nominee," Schumer told reporters during Democrats' weekly press conference.

Schumer said he'd asked Gorsuch specifically about whether a ban on Muslims entering the country would pass constitutional muster and what his view was on the emoluments clause of the Constitution — a conflicts-of-interest clause Democrats say President Trump violated because of his refusal to fully divest from his businesses when he became President.

"I asked him about the emoluments clause and he refused to even say what the framers thought about that clause," Schumer complained.

The Democratic leader didn't fully close the door on voting for Gorsuch, but the comments were the latest indication that he's ready to dig in his heels and battle the nomination.

And while Schumer said the nomniee is "clearly a very smart, polite and capable man who loves being a judge," he warned that his nomination "comes at a perilous time in the relationship between the executive and judicial branches."

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 115th; gorsuch; gorsuchscotus; schmucky; schumer; schumergorsuch; scotus; trump45; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: SeekAndFind

I hear Gorsuch issued a statement saying he had “serious concerns” about Schmucky’s sanity after meeting with him!


101 posted on 02/07/2017 4:41:27 PM PST by TheConservator ("The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LA Woman3

I think Schumer refused to meet with him first. Why did he decide later?


102 posted on 02/07/2017 4:45:01 PM PST by Herman Ball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

I guess Chucky didn’t hear President Trump when the president said he was donating all profits from his foreign business ventures to the U.S. Treasury.

God forbid we should have a successful businessman run for president instead of career politicians like Obama who never worked a day in the private sector in his life. Or pointed headed academicians who bring nothing to the table.


103 posted on 02/07/2017 4:50:24 PM PST by july4thfreedomfoundation (Our 8 Year Nightmare Has Ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In other words, Schumer gave Gorsuch a ringing endorsement.

Since anyone that Schumer would support is someone who should NOT be anywhere near a court, the fact that Schumer refuses to support Gorsuch means he is *highly* qualified.


104 posted on 02/07/2017 4:57:04 PM PST by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

F*ck the schm*ck!


105 posted on 02/07/2017 4:57:30 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (FU Shmuckie Shoomer (Rat-NY) and Prick Durbin(Rat-IL))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I have serious, serious concerns about this nominee," Schumer told reporters...

Never saw that coming.../s

106 posted on 02/07/2017 5:06:13 PM PST by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Shmuckie will say anything to get his face on the cameras.


107 posted on 02/07/2017 5:09:23 PM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Thomas Jefferson owned and ran a farm while serving as President. Other presidents have owned businesses besides Trump. Obama did actually have a private sector job for a short while, but in his book he described it as being “behind enemy lines”. Being a Marxist (despite the desperate denials of his voters), he considers capitalism to be the enemy—even though it’s America’s bread and butter. He thought he could remake us into the world’s first successful socialism, where no one owns a private business. All socialists and Marxists suffer from this delusion, and end up leaving a smoking hell hole in place of a once thriving economy.


108 posted on 02/07/2017 5:09:59 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Listen.

The Democrats are in big trouble.

Schumer has inherited the mantle of de facto leader of the Democrat party and it is an ill-fitting yoke.

He has to run his Party AND defend 23 FREAKING seats in 2018 ... while we defend 8. FUCK SCHUMER 23 SEATS!

We will pick up 5 FIVE of those red state Senate seats even if Trump nukes PyongPaddle and eats a kitten on live cable.

Even so, we need to understand two things: Prosecute the win. Drive up the score.

That's it.

If we understand we are driving the bus for the first time in 36 years, the rest will take care of itself.

109 posted on 02/07/2017 5:15:08 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Prosecute the win. Run up the score.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SparkyBass

That’s a GREAT meme! Trump’s expression - just right!


110 posted on 02/07/2017 5:17:22 PM PST by ichabod1 (The Wise Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LA Woman3

Is there anything that Chuck has less-than-serious concerns about?


111 posted on 02/07/2017 5:19:29 PM PST by Degaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
Doesn’t matter 51 votes is going to do it

So, it IS 51 votes? Schumer was saying as recently as yesterday that it would take 60 votes to confirm Gorsuch.

112 posted on 02/07/2017 5:21:00 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So g-d what.

if chucky liked the judge i would have serious concerns.


113 posted on 02/07/2017 5:26:05 PM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

schumer is going to run for prez in 2020.


114 posted on 02/07/2017 5:26:55 PM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; Sidebar Moderator
I fail to see any 'Breaking' aspect to this 'news'.

That bastard has been the enemy for decades.

115 posted on 02/07/2017 5:27:14 PM PST by tomkat (aka PAtriot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Serious concerns!

Oh, my!!


116 posted on 02/07/2017 5:31:18 PM PST by clintonh8r (AMERICA! THANK YOU FOR MAKING MY SCREEN NAME OBSOLETE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sen. Schumer says he has ‘serious concerns’ about Judge Gorsuch after meeting>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

That is such a good thing, it means that Gorsuch refused to perform the usual liberal fascist style oral sex on Schumer when asked.

Chuck the Schmuck is the champion supercillious speed bump of the confirmation process.


117 posted on 02/07/2017 5:34:42 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Shut Up, Chuck!


118 posted on 02/07/2017 5:41:16 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

I have “serious concerns” over any LIB ever being given any position or authority, power or responsibility. They should be shunned in civil society or crushed to dust (to be blown asunder). Losers...SERIOUS life-losers.


119 posted on 02/07/2017 5:48:26 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
Agree..lol..
120 posted on 02/07/2017 6:21:45 PM PST by samantha (keep up the fight..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson