Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Schumer says he has ‘serious concerns’ about Judge Gorsuch after meeting
New York Daily News ^ | 02/07/2017 | Cameron Joseph

Posted on 02/07/2017 2:14:27 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he has "serious concerns" about Judge Neil Gorsuch after meeting with the Supreme Court nominee on Tuesday — and struggling to get straight answers from him.

"The judge avoided answers like the plague. This president is testing fundamental underpinnings of our democracy and its institutions. These times deserve answers and judge Gorsuch did not provide them. I have serious, serious concerns about this nominee," Schumer told reporters during Democrats' weekly press conference.

Schumer said he'd asked Gorsuch specifically about whether a ban on Muslims entering the country would pass constitutional muster and what his view was on the emoluments clause of the Constitution — a conflicts-of-interest clause Democrats say President Trump violated because of his refusal to fully divest from his businesses when he became President.

"I asked him about the emoluments clause and he refused to even say what the framers thought about that clause," Schumer complained.

The Democratic leader didn't fully close the door on voting for Gorsuch, but the comments were the latest indication that he's ready to dig in his heels and battle the nomination.

And while Schumer said the nomniee is "clearly a very smart, polite and capable man who loves being a judge," he warned that his nomination "comes at a perilous time in the relationship between the executive and judicial branches."

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 115th; gorsuch; gorsuchscotus; schmucky; schumer; schumergorsuch; scotus; trump45; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2017 2:14:27 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m sure he had the same “serious concerns” before the meeting as well.


2 posted on 02/07/2017 2:15:56 PM PST by LA Woman3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

yeah Chucky, like you really know all the ins and outs... Some staffer/attorney asked you to ask him a question they wouldn’t answer.

Clown... we are over your grinning act......


3 posted on 02/07/2017 2:16:05 PM PST by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Caption: “So, Chuck, after your execution for treason your headstone will be about this high.”


4 posted on 02/07/2017 2:16:19 PM PST by MeganC (BOYCOTT Nancy Pelosi's Auberge de Soleil!!! SHUT IT DOWN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

lf THIS goes Straight Party line vote....it’s a sad day for America along with the many sad days these last few years with the Democrat party going to hell in a hand basket
Freegards
LEX


5 posted on 02/07/2017 2:16:54 PM PST by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Whatever Chuckie. You weren’t going to vote for his confirmation anyways so spare us the “I’m concerned” statements.


6 posted on 02/07/2017 2:17:03 PM PST by dowcaet (uart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LA Woman3

Sorry Chuck, you said you were going to fight Trumps pick before you knew who it was, no one believes that you coincidentally don’t like this guy now that you met him.


7 posted on 02/07/2017 2:18:38 PM PST by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

OK, maybe Schumer would like Cruz better...


8 posted on 02/07/2017 2:18:42 PM PST by GOPJ ("CHRISTIAN BAN" DURING WORLD WAR II: GERMANS AND ITALIANS STOPPED FROM IMMIGRATING TO U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

9 posted on 02/07/2017 2:18:52 PM PST by freedomlover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dowcaet

Exactly! Why even give him a meeting? Must have been painful for Gorsuch.


10 posted on 02/07/2017 2:18:56 PM PST by Zarro (Oh, we don't call them the "MSM" any longer; they are now the "Basket of Detestables")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is no “emoluments clause” saying the president can’t hold a business. It only says he can’t accept gifts from a foreign state. Democrats can’t tell the difference, apparently.


11 posted on 02/07/2017 2:19:09 PM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LA Woman3

I have serious concerns about Schumer after learning that he has accepted donations from Soros in the past. I find that more worrisome than Gorsuch being tied to the CFR 23 years ago...


12 posted on 02/07/2017 2:19:24 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m shocked!


13 posted on 02/07/2017 2:19:31 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No, you are incapable of “serious” concerns, Schmuckie. You have douchebag concerns.


14 posted on 02/07/2017 2:19:32 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

The so called concerns of Chuckie, Pelosi, ? fill in the blank don’t even reach the level of fakes news.

Concerns of the lying liberals is not even fake news.


15 posted on 02/07/2017 2:19:37 PM PST by Grampa Dave (When Trump is through destroying the press, Trump will MPGA (Make the Press Great Again)!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It had to be torture for Gorsuch to sit with that fool.


16 posted on 02/07/2017 2:19:50 PM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dear Chuckie,
a ban on all Moslems entering the country would not only pass constitutional muster, with a score of 100+ percent.... it would be in accordance with previous immigration policies over our American history

please read your American history, also our Constitution and our laws that are on the books (charging the president with the responsibility to deny or revoke visas to anybody or any groups of persons that he deems a threat to USA)

probably, since you’ve been in WashDC so long, probably those laws were passed while you were there?


17 posted on 02/07/2017 2:20:11 PM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dear Chuckie,
asking the nominee if he thinks DJT’s order about certain limited numbers of Moslems from terrorist dens...entering USA...would ‘pass constitutional muster?”

only displays your ignorance of both our US Constitution and the immigration laws that are already on the books

it would make you look a whole lot better if you did a little homework first.. and then asked questions which displayed some knowledge of American history and our legal system


18 posted on 02/07/2017 2:22:16 PM PST by faithhopecharity ("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I have serious concerns about Chuck-u Shumer and I’ve never even met him.


19 posted on 02/07/2017 2:22:34 PM PST by KevinB (Barack Obama: The best example in history of the dangers of affirmative action!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
If Chucky did not have 'serious concerns' about Gorsuch, I would be concerned.
20 posted on 02/07/2017 2:22:35 PM PST by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson