Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Harry Reid Defends Senate Rule Change: 'What Was Fair for President Obama Is Fair for Trump'(T)
cnsnews.com ^ | 12/8/2016 | Susan Jones

Posted on 12/08/2016 8:30:10 AM PST by rktman

Outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, writing in Thursday's New York Times [1], says he has "a few things to say," now that he's leaving the Senate for good.

Reid devoted half of his op-ed to a defense of the Senate rule change he instituted in 2013. The so-called "nuclear option" will allow confirmation of Donald Trump's nominees (except for the Supreme Court) by a simple 51-vote majority. It eliminates the filibuster.

"One thing we fought for that’s worth defending is a fairer, more open and more productive Senate," Reid wrote. "We changed the Senate rules to guarantee a president’s nominees a fair, simple-majority vote, and declared that a president’s nominees should not be stymied with procedural hurdles and a requirement for supermajority votes.

"We declared that the changes should apply regardless of which party was in the White House, because fair votes are what democracy is all about. I doubt any of us envisioned Donald J. Trump’s becoming the first president to take office under the new rules. But what was fair for President Obama is fair for President Trump."

Reid called the rule change a "victory" for a "functioning, open and transparent Senate."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: trumpstillwinning; trumpwinsagain; what
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Wait, what? Must be some sort of ploy on the dems part. They are a sneaky bunch. Or that treadmill "accident" did more damage than we were told. Time for the kindly old gentleman to head for the retirement home down in Searchlight. Adios hairy. You will NOT be missed. Of course he'll still have his hands in the pie pulling kat mantos strings.
1 posted on 12/08/2016 8:30:10 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

How about ruling by EOs?

Ignoring laws you don’t like?

Making up laws you wished you had?

Making international “agreements” and bypassing the Senate?

Using the IRS and EPA to go after your political enemies?


2 posted on 12/08/2016 8:32:44 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Is this the “Fake News” I have been hearing about?


3 posted on 12/08/2016 8:33:44 AM PST by Scrambler Bob (LOTS of /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Wow, first classy thing Reid ever said.


4 posted on 12/08/2016 8:34:04 AM PST by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Reid has had his ass literally kicked and has no more fight in him ... he’s out and gone and knows it.


5 posted on 12/08/2016 8:34:13 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Sounds like he had a nice chat with Mr Trump, don’t EVER forget that Donald J Trump has been BUYING AND SELLING Scumbag Politicians like Harry Reid his entire LIFE!! I guarantee you he has more dirt on more politicos than anyone could possibly imagine.


6 posted on 12/08/2016 8:34:16 AM PST by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Hahahahahaahahaha Dingy Harry


7 posted on 12/08/2016 8:34:24 AM PST by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Must be some sort of ploy on the dems part.

Yep, they don't want the nuclear option for SCOTUS picks so they can be magnanimous for cabinet and other picks. They are saying we are playing by the existing rules, just don't change them for SCOTUS.

8 posted on 12/08/2016 8:34:27 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Harry is on defense.
He realizes he will have a huge target on his
back once the Left sees Trump using his rules to
begin slamming nominees through the system.


9 posted on 12/08/2016 8:34:29 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“One thing we fought for that’s worth defending is a fairer, more open and more productive Senate,”

look out for that lightning bolt there dingy.


10 posted on 12/08/2016 8:34:42 AM PST by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I guess his brother punching him out might have knocked some sense into ol’ Dingy Harry.


11 posted on 12/08/2016 8:34:47 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

He thinks the Rats will be back soon?


12 posted on 12/08/2016 8:35:52 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Why is SCOTUS not part of the option ?


13 posted on 12/08/2016 8:36:17 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The sight of Rats blaming each other will be quite amusing.


14 posted on 12/08/2016 8:36:34 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I hope there’s no change in the IRS political targeting of those not in power then too.

The public has a right to know your story of riches Harry.


15 posted on 12/08/2016 8:36:57 AM PST by jcon40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

1st time Harry Reid was right on something. It is a Christmas Miracle!


16 posted on 12/08/2016 8:38:23 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Trump discriminates against non-successful people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

What else can he say?


17 posted on 12/08/2016 8:38:55 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Because that is how the Dems structured their nuclear option change, which the Reps have kept in force.

On November 2013, Senate Democrats used the nuclear option to eliminate filibusters on executive branch nominations and federal judicial appointments other than those to the Supreme Court. ... A three-fifths vote is still required to end debates on legislation and Supreme Court nominations.

18 posted on 12/08/2016 8:41:33 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Yep, they don't want the nuclear option for SCOTUS picks so they can be magnanimous for cabinet and other picks. They are saying we are playing by the existing rules, just don't change them for SCOTUS.

That makes the most sense here. You know the Democrats will be Borking his pro-life nominees for SCOTUS because they won't support the slaughter of unborn children in the womb. It's always about abortion with these people.
19 posted on 12/08/2016 8:42:01 AM PST by Deo volente ("Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives finally on November 8th." Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Harry makes me feel tired just looking at his picture.


20 posted on 12/08/2016 8:44:21 AM PST by Maudeen (No one on this earth is too far gone for Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson