Posted on 11/28/2016 9:48:58 AM PST by doug from upland
Post 81 here on this thread by the poster Future Useless Eater looks spot on, that the recount fee hadn’t been properly paid by the deadline and therefore the Wisconsin recount should be stopped by a federal court. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498729/posts
There is an apparent conflict between two statutes. One requires payment when filing for recount; the other references an estimate required to be given to the filer. If they did not give Stein the amount to pay, how could she pay it? This may end up in Wisconsin Supreme Court and perhaps SCOTUS. Here we go again.
MI has more stringent rules on recounts than WI; h/t redfreedom
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3499119/posts?page=36#36
There is also an outstanding arrest warrant in North Dakota for the petitioner Jill Stein.
According to this post by Future Useless Eater the co-petitioner was in an embassy in Cuba, post #335. Also look at the signature of the petitioner and the notary on the petition. It looks like the same handwriting and that the same person signed as both the petitioner and the notary. Can't notarized one's own signature. This may have been done because it was done in Havana and they didn't have a U.S. Citizen notary there. Would think that this could make the whole petition fraudulent. Also it would qualify as fore in interference in a U.S. Election I believe. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498729/posts
HERE IS JILL’S ARGUMENT IF IT GOES TO COURT —— she filed in a timely manner but the commission did not give her the estimate as required by Wisconsin law. Without that estimate, she could not pay. They admit in press release that they are still calculating the estimated fees.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Per a press release posted to the Commission’s website, the recount will start late next week after the appropriate personnel have been assembled and after Stein pays the recount fee. While no expectations were given for a completion date, the Commission noted that the federal deadline for all recounts is December 13th.
“The Commission is preparing to move forward with a statewide recount of votes for President of the United States, as requested by these candidates,” Haas said.
“We have assembled an internal team to direct the recount, we have been in close consultation with our county clerk partners, and have arranged for legal representation by the Wisconsin Department of Justice,” Haas said. “We plan to hold a teleconference meeting for county clerks next week and anticipate the recount will begin late in the week after the Stein campaign has paid the recount fee, which we are still calculating.”
Think this was the link I meant to supply on the guy filing from the Embassy in Havana: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498745/posts
I’ve read so many posts and so much conflicting information my head is spinning.
Regarding Pennsylvania: is it true that the only way a recount can happen is if Ms Stein petitions in court that there’s “prima facie” evidence of fraud, tampering, hacking, etc? If that’s true, I don’t see a recount happening. What are the facts regarding Pennsylvania? Thanks.
Here is a very detailed column on the PA recount, and why it is not going to happen.
http://janderresearch.blogspot.fi/2016/11/there-will-be-no-recount-in.html?m=1
One caveat - there are some precincts where the three-voter challenge can happen, but not enough to make a difference.
Thank you
“Chad Livengood ;@ChadLivengood · 1h1 hour ago
ALERT: President-elect Trump has hired Lansing election law super attorneys Gary Gordon and John Pirich to represent him in Stein’s recount.”
Mihigan reporter, seems to have early info.
https://twitter.com/ChadLivengood
What does it take to become an FR Master? Are their trials one has to pass?
Some info on what may happen in WI; recount might show Dem cheating (h/t tiger claws)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498745/posts?page=314#314
De la fuente filed his petition from Havana (h/t future useless eater)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3498745/posts?page=335#335
Wikipedia on De La Fuente has him running his campaign for President on $ 16,999 of contributions and $ 6.9 million in loans, had been informed by prior poster on thread of the loans amount.
Initiative and the perception that such is a good idea which will help other FReepers.
This Wikipedia entry mentions Roque De La Fuente in relation to some alleged FDIC offense: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocky_De_La_Fuente
LOL
That is flipping funny
Butthurt. Lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.