Posted on 11/26/2016 4:47:07 PM PST by Kaslin
OK - what does “sit tight”? Put my asz in a vise?
The walls are going to fall down and we’ll all be killed!
You came up with that, not me.
Rest firmly, yet without giving up the capability of the possibility of acting in future.
Why should I have to hit people over the head with a Captain Obvious bat?
How many electoral votes are there to recount?
Thanks for the correction. I checked and in the state of Wisconsin the candidate pays for the recount. I guess she has requested a hand recount,
HOWEVER, I am also advising about where Redneck Vision sees this thing is going to go.
It will not need any conservative hair on fire. Donald Trump’s own tone is a pretty good keynote here. A train wreck for the left is taking shape.
I have no idea but when it happens to a car or other motorized piece of machinery we call it BROKEN.
You read things that were not there into it. You are like the storied fundamentalist who, when he comes to a stop sign, expects it to tell him to go, and when it doesn’t, he throws a tantrum and sues everyone he can think of.
And again in #5:
Let’s sit tight and pray and watch, but try not to worry.
Funny that the Democrats that claim to be for the people desire to invalidate an entire states vote. And delayed this effort to insure it.
Trump says this is scam to fill coffers. This is a very mistaken point of view.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/802671162383802368
Trying to say the time is ripe for this. It’s Satan who wants you to get your hair on fire and try to ignite everybody else’s hair with it.
Don’t believe me? Well come right back after this plays out just like I said it would. WHEN. WHEN. WHEN. Because I read the signs of the times and of the people. Not everything is a hair burning emergency.
No.
Every state casts it’s electoral votes no matter what.
Remember the Fla legislature was prepared to determine the state’s votes but the Supreme Court put a stop to the Dem Fla judge’s tomfoolery.
That’s the Constitution’s ‘last-ditch’ assurance of a state’s ability to cast electoral votes.
ACCURATE point of view (FIFY)
Let’s “sit tight and watch” /s
Watch the election be stolen.
Why do this? They are running the risk of exposing their own fraud, especially in Wisconsin!
Jill has had a HISTORY of this, or do you not stop to think?
It’s part of the frenemy codependence between the Democrats and the Greens.
Donald has GOOOOOOD political advisors.
Watch the attempt to steal it break so many bonds of evil that we will be tired of winning... JUST THERE!
If the total number of votes counted this time is many thousands higher than the original total there’ll have to be a complete audit to find out why and the ‘new’ result won’t be certified. It’ll be challenged and tied up in court with plenty of allegations of fraud and ballot stuffing.
Were that to happen, the electoral college would remove that state and reduce the magic number accordingly and Trump would still win. Whether he’s got 306 EVs or 270 or even some smaller number, he’ll still have more empaneled electors than Illary so she still loses. Her current number of 232 EVs simply isn’t going to ever be enough to surpass Trump’s number, whatever that final number ends up being.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.