Posted on 09/26/2016 6:58:14 AM PDT by Zakeet
DEMOCRAT HILLARY CLINTON and Republican Donald Trump will debate on national television for the first time Monday night, and the stakes could not be higher. The presidency and, by extension, the country's future - maybe the world's - could hinge on what they say and how they say it.
Or so we have been told - in breathless pre-event speculation about everything from whether the moderator, NBC's Lester Holt, will intervene to correct a candidate who strays from the truth, to whether one candidate or the other will be able to goad his or her opponent into a campaign-altering gaffe before an audience expected to reach 100 million.
Permit us to dissent from this conventional wisdom, vigorously. Yes, Monday night's clash, and two additional debates to follow, will add drama to the election, and a bit more data to the massive pile of it already available to voters. In a fundamental sense, however, there is nothing much at stake, or shouldn't be, because there is not much more to learn: Mr. Trump has amply demonstrated his unworthiness to occupy the Oval Office. It's beyond his capacity in the upcoming 90-minute question-and-answer sessions to reverse or even substantially modify that conclusion.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Basically, they're wetting their pants out of fear ... and want to cancel tonight's show!
Pinkos are always “beyond debate.”
There they go again, the WaPo commie libs confusing a Marxist dictator with the President of the United States.
“Pay no attention to that man behind the podium! “
Yeah. The science is settled.
Climate change is also beyond debate. I wonder if the WP would like to prosecute anyone who supports Trump?
“It’s beyond debate that”
This is that SJW way of writing a headline where they tell you what to think, and then state that you are not aloud to dissent.
Really. What an original thought.
People used to say Palin was unfit to be president. My response was always the same: Compared to whom? Biden? Obama? McCain?
Put those four in a room and she is the most qualified.
And I ask the same question here: Compared to whom? Reagan?
No. Hillary.
I know Trump is wealthy, personally, but Shrillary has the big money behind her, unfortunately.
Just an opinion.
Trump was never even a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER!!
Can you believe that?
More like WaPo throws their poo like a monkey.
It’s also beyond debate that Gorebull Worming is real and can no longer be argued.
What’s wrong with the left that they must resort to Goebbles/Stalin like tactics
Right, the debate is over. Trump is the better choice.
And yet the race continues so obviously not everyone agrees with the Post.
“however Obama who never held a job was perfectly qualified”
The Bezos arrack dogs keep showing they are nothing but nipping chiauauas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.