Posted on 08/21/2016 3:28:51 PM PDT by QT3.14
Anyone who wishes to see how the Left has historically used and abused the news media in this country should visit the Newseum in Washington, D.C. The entire exhibit is very high quality and very interesting, but it is clearly designed to be a resounding acclamation of American journalism’s liberal ideology.
I didn’t make it.
It has always been driven by the progressive agenda, the desire for power.
There are numerous instances where the old media has passed obtaining more money because the money did not fit their agenda.
For example, the old media refused to sell ads to the NRA for 40 years, at least.
There are rules for attracting an audience via journalism:Those rules imply, not merely negativity, but cynicism. The first is negativity, the second is negativity toward the good and positivity toward evil, the third claims that negativity toward the good and positivity toward the evil is objective - and the last implies applying those rules in a slapdash, arbitrary manner when necessary.
- If it bleeds, it leads.
- Man Bites Dog, not Dog Bites Man
- Claim that all journalists are objective.
- Always make your deadline
Each of those rules is justifiably strictly from a commercial viewpoint. Taken together, they constitute cynicism, and therefore socialism.
. . . and then they wonder why we think there is bias in the media.
Time for another:::
Now for a short public service announcement to all on FR:
We need to ensure we don't get another Obama-like America Hater as the next President.
The best way to ensure that is to actively support a candidate (even if he's "rich enough to do it on his own") as the next President.
I donate to the candidate I support and you should too, else, your "support" really doesn't have any meaning.
It's even worse if you use FR and don't donate. If you are one of those who feel it's OK to use FR daily w/o helping pay to keep the lights on, then please don't complain about the welfare leeches because, functionally, you are no different than any other who enjoys the fruits of others' work for your own benefit. Also, don't be surprised if others decide that your opinions are as worthless as your non-donations - hypocrites aren't worth listening to.
PS - If you are one of those unlucky few who cannot afford even a small donation to FR or a candidate, God Bless and happy FReeping!.....
They never forgave him for sinking Alger Hiss. And they never will.
Very good read!
I grew up thru 60s three network tv and print
And yes it leaned left
But nothing like this
The gap between Time and Mother Jones is ever closing
And TV is nutz...
Part of it is the minutiae of the agenda
Would leftist Cronkite and left leaning Paley today pimp for homosexual marriage and outright gun confiscation?
I was a college small L radical then......we thought the MSM was staid and right wing...lol
I read Crawdaddy and the aforementioned MJ and the Nation and Ramparts etc to counter that
As I progressed I moved on to the Economist and The New Republic etc in my early to mid 20s transition
By Magnus assasination attempt I was 180
I remember when US News and World Report was conservative.....
And try imagining Abe Rosenthal at the Old Grey Slattern today
Alger Hiss, defeating the “Pink Lady” for his first job in the Congress, and generally being a capable Republican, one of the best prepared men for presidency ever, whom they couldn’t scare or buy off.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.