Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen: Trump 42, Hillary 37
Rasmussen ^

Posted on 05/19/2016 6:16:34 AM PDT by profit_guy

Donald Trump has now grown his lead over Hillary Clinton in Rasmussen Reports’ first weekly White House Watch survey.

Trump earns 42% support to Clinton’s 37% when Likely U.S. Voters are asked whom they would vote for if the presidential election were held today.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2016polls; election2016; hillary2016; newyork; polls; rasmussen; trump; trump2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-165 next last
To: profit_guy

Can’t be true.

We have been told for months by the NeverTrumpers on this board, tv, radio and in print that Clintoon will kick Trump’s butt.

BOL! Wait until Trump really goes after the rapist Clintoon and that rapist’s lying supporter, who is running for president.


81 posted on 05/19/2016 7:45:14 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( @ 1150 delegates Trump needs 87 more, to get to the needed 1,237 as of May 10, 2016, Jeff Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

I think Trump will choose a moderate liberal for a running mate, to cement in those Reagan dems that fear all things conservative.


82 posted on 05/19/2016 7:45:25 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: central_va; Democrat_media

Trump is going to win an a landslide even with out Branch Cruzadian support.


Mainly because the Branch Cruzadians are going to turn out to be a tiny subset of all those who voted for Ted Cruz in the primaries.

You really think all those Texan Cruz voters are going to sit on their hands and allow a President Witch?

If you do, you think very, very little of Cruz-supporting Texans and I feel sorry for you.


83 posted on 05/19/2016 7:47:12 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump For America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: djpg

Yes, Romney may have been leading but then came Hurricane Sandy and Obama looked like he was in charge and leading and of course Romney’s unwillingness to fight back and running what Pat Caddell has called one of the worst run campaigns in American Political History.


84 posted on 05/19/2016 7:47:42 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Mainly because the Branch Cruzadians are going to turn out to be a tiny subset of all those who voted for Ted Cruz in the primaries.

Agree.

85 posted on 05/19/2016 7:48:39 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner; djpg

This time 4 years ago Romney was busy saying nothing while the Obama campaign was busy defining him as a 1%er out of touch with the middle class.

Romney DID run the worst campaign in the history of our Republic.


86 posted on 05/19/2016 7:49:14 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump For America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: JLAGRAYFOX

Obama can’t throw Hillary under the bus, this is fantasy. Democratic Party is bigger than Obama.

Realistically the party has no one else they can run. That’s the only reason Hillary is there at all—if they could’ve supplanted her with a younger, fresher face, they wouldn’t have hesitated to do so.

Biden parachuting in at the last minute is silly, and will only make them look weaker. It’s too late at this point. They’ve made their bed with Hillary and they’re going to lay in it.

I’m sure some party officials already see the writing on the wall and have strategically written 2016 off as a loss.


87 posted on 05/19/2016 7:49:21 AM PDT by Utmost Certainty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I love that phrase, by the way: Branch Cruzadians.

Kudos to you for coining it!


88 posted on 05/19/2016 7:49:59 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump For America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Democrats hate too much

“I don’t think they thought Sanders would do this well. He is pulling way too many delegates then they planned. They probably also thought Sanders would have dropped out earlier.”

Sanders had a couple of big crowds wanting more socialism in the N. Californiacator area this week.


89 posted on 05/19/2016 7:50:33 AM PDT by Grampa Dave ( @ 1150 delegates Trump needs 87 more, to get to the needed 1,237 as of May 10, 2016, Jeff Head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: profit_guy

“Down goes Frazier! Down goes Frazier!”


90 posted on 05/19/2016 7:51:50 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media
We need to get Trump and Cruz together for a Trump/Cruz ticket

Cruz adds nothing to the ticket.

Texas will vote for Trump with or without Cruz.

Cruz stunk in the South.

In the most important swing states like Ohio and Pennsylvania, Cruz was invisible in the rear view mirror.

He may be a reliably consistent conservative but he does nothing to help the ticket.

91 posted on 05/19/2016 7:52:13 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Good observations on your part! Obama and his team made it a special point to tie Romney with the “evil” Bain Capital.
Romney said almost nothing in reply. His campaign should have been aware of the attacks tying him to Bain. The Democrats did it once before-when he ran for the senate against Ted.


92 posted on 05/19/2016 7:52:49 AM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: fireman15
Have you seen the Anti-Trump ads done by Priorities USA?

They were supposed to start running June 8 but have been started this week as Hillary has been tanking.

Priorities USA is a Hillary PAC but it could be just as well be a Romney PAC or GOPe PAC.

93 posted on 05/19/2016 7:53:37 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast

“Down goes Frazier! Down goes Frazier!”


:)


94 posted on 05/19/2016 7:53:37 AM PDT by samtheman (Trump For America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media

No Cruz. I know he sounds good to some people when he talks about Constitutional conservatism and some such. But he’s just another globalist deceiver.


95 posted on 05/19/2016 7:56:00 AM PDT by Utmost Certainty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: profit_guy

96 posted on 05/19/2016 7:58:29 AM PDT by RayofHope (I want to be sick of winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: New Jersey Realist

“Obama will realize that Shillery can not beat Trump so he will allow Justice Dept to prosecute her so he can get Biden in place to continue the Obama destroy America policy.

You heard it here first.”

I came to that conclusion months ago, and have spelled it out here several times.

Frankly, I think the Obama camp (and most Dem party insiders) understood from the outset, that the White House would go back to the Republicans this year. It’s why they didn’t waste any of their better talent in this election.

Better to engineer the primary to give it to Hillary, knowing all along that she would lose to a ham sandwich in the general election. Hillary gets to run to stay out of prison, while also convincing her billionaire ‘donors’ that she’s seriously pursuing the office (she’s not).

Meanwhile, the Dem party can finally rid themselves of the Clintons in a clean and cost free manner.

And what of Hillary’s email scandal? I think Obama’s been planning all along to leave her to the wolves. If Comey has built the airtight body of evidence I think he has, the DOJ won’t have any recourse, and will have to indict. That, of course, also makes it easier to air drop a replacement nominee into the race. The only question is, who’s going to play the part of sacrificial lamb.


97 posted on 05/19/2016 7:58:37 AM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Makes me nervous that the Dems will try to replace Hillary with another candidate.

They coronated her. Let them live with their decision.

98 posted on 05/19/2016 7:58:46 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Such a thing doesn’t help them.

Hillary has the most delegates, crookedly obtained or otherwise, after being promised the nomination for stepping aside in 08...

And they just tell her to shove off?

Not likely.


99 posted on 05/19/2016 7:58:48 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: profit_guy
Clinton is unelectable. The Democrats are not going to give it to Crazy Bernie. When will they dust off Creepy Uncle Joe?


100 posted on 05/19/2016 8:03:37 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Every nation has the government it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson