"And it gives women an identity choice. Do they pick the leader who says the woman card is a qualification for a good job? Or do they pick the leader who has a long record of promoting and mentoring women because he thinks gender should not be a qualification?
Landslide."
‘Or do they pick the leader who has a long record of promoting and mentoring women because he thinks gender should not be a qualification’
Trump and his operatives are going to have to work hard to get this information to the masses. Big Media is only covering his questionable statements against women.....they will never admit he might be a good candidate on women’s issues.
Scott Adams has had a pretty good read on how well Trump would do in the GOP race going back to the beginning.
The internals in the national polls put Trump 5-7% ahead of Romney’s 2012 election night exit polling across all demographics, Hillary is still 13%-15% back of Obama’s, with all the undecideds still up in the air.
Which means that Hillary’s still fighting to reach Obama’s pathetic accomplishment, whereas Trump is eating into that with room to grow.
Landslide is indeed a likely outcome, should Trump be the nominee. Outside of that, good luck.
“Trump at a Trump rally is mostly stand-up comedy. Trump in a serious interview is a different character. Trump is completely transparent about his different personas, and people are starting to see it as strategy, not insanity.”
Ding, ding, ding! Nailed it, something many here (or not here???) didn’t get because they didn’t watch the serious interviews. They surface-skimmed among the Twitterati and enjoyed lampooning a caricature.
Wow. Thanks for posting.
Wait until a few weeks of enduring the Rosie O’Donnell ghetto beatdown. Hillary will be showing up at her appearances with an open bottle of Wild Turkey in her hand and a strand of garlic around her neck. :-)
The comments at the site are interesting.
“Trump in a serious interview is a different character. Trump is completely transparent about his different personas, and people are starting to see it as strategy, not insanity.”
Funny. Yes, Trump in an one-on-one interview is amazing. He is totally different than he was in the debates. He needs to bring some of that when debating Hillary.
“Cruz approach to winning delegates without winning the popular vote looks smart and effective. But it also makes him look like the lawyer that he is. Thats not a good look.”
I’m sure Cruz thought it was smart - but from a perception viewpoint, it backfired.
The dynamics changed after Colorado and the Louisiana and other state’s delegate issues. After that, Trump won states by over 50% and won among evangelicals and those saying they are mostly conservative. They don’t like the scheming either.
Ah, a tagline update gleaned from the article.