Posted on 04/10/2016 4:45:45 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
Bang on.
Early on I gave $50 to Cruz by cash in the mail without return address. I have trust issues.
I am for Trump now.
Those for Cruz, what will he do if he gets enough delegates but lawsuits ‘re his eligibility start? Just say he thinks he’s eligible therefore he is? No...Ryan will be behind these, too...that is the purpose...and further, he knows this and Cruz is pro big visa...cheap labor. There is no win, no constitution, no pro-people in that path. Trump is the anti-Patomac-water candidate...all others represent the slow or fast train of the end of the republic.
A simple anecdote...Cruz knows the IRA takeover executive action in the ACA-commiecare and we have about 85 posts on that thread here...which candidate would stop that?
Trump? Cruz? Postman-son? Ryan? Clinton?
Easy answer. If you say Cruz then I remind you that investmentwise show me how Goldiesachs won’t benefit. I don’t list Sanders as he isn’t a candidate.
Yeah for sure. I know its a slam on teddy bears everywhere but it fits so well.
Congratulations on being a delegate but
Why Cruz over Trump?
Well, that settles it. If a gal on Facebook says it, it MUST be true!
Ping list please! Thank you
The number is even higher, really. Considering that it’s been 43 years since 1973, some of those aborted babies could have grown and had babies themselves.
So many lives snuffed out. No worse or better than mine or yours, except their mothers didn’t want them, or were convinced they couldn’t have or keep them.
It thin I know but does a young mommy like that just make stuff like that up? Inquiring minds..once again me be messenger.....You gotta admit the accompanying link does add some credence to her statement.
You are in!
Everyone welcome BreezyDog, or latest Sunday thread FRiend!
Now let's welcome tirednvirginia, our new, latest Sunday thread FRiend!
I have been for Ted Cruz since the very start, RG.
Why change now? I still like him.
But again, with a smile on my face, should Trump get it I will support him and, in fact, be super okay with it.
Not enough, however, to vote FOR Trump but you got till 4/30 to change my mind.
Because I am, in this year of election years when delegates are everything...A DELEGATE!
They expect me to write about it and everybody’s who is everybody....and guys I know them all....will be there.
I’m psyched. I am woman....hear me roar.
Why should there be? It works for them.
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." - attributed to Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili (Joseph Stalin)
Week after week we get more and more evidence/indications that voter fraud is more rampant that we ever guessed. Earlier in the week I learned that machines from SCYTL, a company in Spain I believe, is easily hackable as well.
This is the company that several years ago both zero and the big mooch went to in person to visit.
I got a story about voter fraud right here in the swamps.
Last year one of our guys, the Sussex GOP, actually caught the husband of a Democratic candidate STEALING CAMPAIGN SIGNS! Got it on video, in the newspapers, and all.
So the state Republican party, headed by Charles Copeland, lover of Mike Castle....betcha y’all didn’t know about this?....said the Republican party will not file a complaint, aren’t they just the sweetest, those Repubs being gentlemen and everything?
So LAST WEEK....they got the same guy on audio tape taking commands from a county exec. up state to browbeat folks in Section 8 housing, that he owns, to vote for HIS WIFE!
This guy has been perverting the election process for years and the Republican party, via Mike Castle’s lover (you know I CAN’T make this up) gave him a pass.
The state is an uproar over this, as well it should be.
Republicans lose because they give it away.
I used to work for a large company and got to see some of the inner workings of it. Many times, I made the statement that "a large company most often makes morally correct decisions. It's not because there aren't some who might sometimes like to cheat, it's because too many people have to be involved in the conspiracy, and one of them would certainly expose it."
Look at Volkswagen. They cheated on diesel engine emissions, and now they're is so much trouble the company will likely fold. AMC did almost the exact same thing a few decades ago, and they folded. (VW used ABS sensors to detect when the vehicle was in the emission test, AMC used the hood lamp switch.) Cheaters will almost always get exposed, so large companies can't afford to cheat. A company that makes its livelihood on voting machines can't possibly have a problem that's a decade old in its machines, and still expect to market them successfully.
Good candidates make the difference. A lot of times if we don’t get the right people in the primaries it’s all over for us.Sadly, more and more people who could run and “could” do a good job don’t want to put up with the process.
Seems (diebold) they did change their name. Interesting coincidence. But backs up what you contend.
Well, now we know the truth. You're a GOPe lackey who will lie, steal, and cheat in order to get Mitt nominated.........or is it McCain........or, yes, I know, it's BOB DOLE!!!
Actually, congratulations! And don't let anyone move you away from Ted!
In 2012 and the Obama blowout, it became really obvious. If you dug down into the numbers in the "key" states, you would find ticket splitting with Obama being the universal recipient at the top while the GOP was getting voted for down ballot (it seldom went the "other way" benefiting Romney). Such is highly unlikely in an innocent "machine error", to say the least. An honest error should split 50-50.
All it takes is a few % change in these states to make a huge difference, and it did. It helps immensely to have "the machine" on your side.
Sorry for not taking notes, but he claims Cruz's tactics will wear thin (he actually said Cruz was using Gestapo tactics - that soundbite will be replayed ad nauseum), that the Trump campaign would be filing complaints in some cases, but that all of that is secondary. Challenged on his claim that Trump would "have the nomination" by mid-May, Manafort clarified that by mid-May, the path would be clear, that Trump would be the presumptive nominee, even though not having yet locked up 1237 delegates.
Early in the interview, Manafort said that Trump wasn't quite as "shut out" of state delegate selection as the press would have the public believe. That Trump had good success in Alabama, and has set the stage for good success at the Nevada convention.
Manafort comes off as pleasant, not confrontational, cool, calm, and confident.
You are absolutely correct. The last fraudulent story I recall the goal was to have a 51/49 result and the machines were allegedly programmed to do just that the day before the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.