Posted on 03/10/2016 9:57:59 AM PST by Kaslin
Bernie Sanders' upset victory in Michigan came just two days after he stood on the debate stage in the perennially beleaguered city of Flint, Michigan, and decried the economic condition of the surrounding area. He put the blame where he, like Donald Trump, often puts it: on free trade.
"Do you know that in 1960, Detroit, Michigan, was one of the wealthiest cities in America?" he demanded. "Flint, Michigan, was a prosperous city. But then what happened is corporate America said, 'Why do I want to pay somebody in Michigan a living wage when I could pay slave wages in Mexico or China?'"
A pre-debate tweet from Sanders featured bleak photos of abandoned buildings and said, "The people of Detroit know the real cost of Hillary Clinton's free trade policies."
Michigan has seen more than its share of economic trouble, but the senator from Vermont is not the guy to explain it. The decline he lamented and the causes he cited didn't come close to coinciding. Many vacant buildings in the Motor City were vacant when Clinton was practicing law in Little Rock.
Michael Moore's documentary film "Roger & Me," about the calamitous shutdown of General Motors plants in Flint, came out in 1989 -- more than four years before the North American Free Trade Agreement took effect and long before China exported much of anything. Detroit lost more than a third of its population between 1960 and 1990.
A generation ago, the auto industry was competing not with companies in Mexico or China but with those in Japan. Toyota, Honda and other Japanese companies took sales away from the Big Three, particularly after the energy crisis of the 1970s, by offering cars that were more reliable and fuel-efficient.
They won over American consumers at a time when trade was far from free. President Ronald Reagan protected U.S. automakers by forcing "voluntary" limits on Japanese auto sales. Japanese trucks faced a 25 percent import duty -- which is still in effect.
The other changes that hurt the Michigan auto industry were not the product of trade agreements. One was the migration of production to other states, particularly those with right-to-work laws that impeded the powerful United Auto Workers union. Today most U.S. factories operated by Ford and General Motors are located outside of Michigan -- as is every plant operated by foreign automakers.
The other change came in the form of automation. Many of the jobs that have vanished in American car factories haven't moved abroad; they've gone to robots and other labor-saving machinery. Since 2000, when domestic auto employment peaked, the number of workers required to produce a given number of vehicles has fallen by more than one-third.
Breaking down trade barriers would actually help the American auto industry and those on the assembly lines. One major attraction of building cars in Mexico is that it has free trade agreements with 45 countries -- while the U.S. has free trade deals with just 20. Exporting to most of the world is easier there than here.
Bernard Swiecki, an analyst at the Michigan-based Center for Automotive Research, told Business Alabama why Audi recently decided to put a factory in Mexico instead of the U.S.: "If they export it, they save $4,500 per vehicle in tariffs they don't have to pay."
Sanders said Sunday that American workers shouldn't have to compete with "people in Mexico making 25 cents an hour." He's greatly exaggerating. U.S. automakers there pay $8 to $10 an hour.
That's a lot less than American autoworkers earn, but the wage gap doesn't matter as much as you might think. U.S. plants still roll out three times as many cars and trucks as their Mexican counterparts.
Sanders falls in a long tradition of trying to wall our economy off from the world. The AFL-CIO opposed the 1987 free trade agreement with Canada. The Vermont socialist would deny American consumers the better products and lower prices that such accords provide.
Those benefits are especially important to people of limited means, who spend a disproportionate share of their income on necessities. Yet many of these people have cast their ballots for Sanders and Trump.
If Michiganders went to Wal-Mart or Home Depot tomorrow and found the shelves stripped of everything made abroad, they would quickly grasp the upside of free trade. If either of the people they chose for president gets to the White House, that realization may come, but too late.
Bwahahahahahaha. Sweet.
Underwear is cheaper at Walmart because of dogmatic free trade. However, the accounting doesn’t stop there. And all these articles always stop right there. $5 in social costs plus $5 for underwear is more expensive than $10 underwear. A socially dependent deindustrialized America is a useless vessel on its way to becoming Greece. Tsk, tsk, tsk.
Free trade example: China has a 10% tariff on US autos imported to China. The US has none on Chinese cars.
Nearly all 2016 Buicks are made in China.
Disgusting that so many here agree with Bernie (and the vast majority of dems) and want high taxes. No, thank you.
Free trade is also poision at the ballot box.
For both parties.
But don’t expect them to stop pushing it.
I’m not agreeing with Bernie, I’m stating facts about trade that are easily verified.
What’s disgusting are free traitors because it’s never free in both directions.
“China has a 10% tariff on US autos imported to China. The US has none on Chinese cars.”
IIRC, we have a 2.5% tariff on imported cars and a 25% tariff on imported light trucks.
What happened to Detroit and Flint is fifty-plus years of the kind of policies you adore, Bernie!
> I had to buy four can openers at Walmart before I could finally find a US made opener that actually worked
I had that happen as well. The metal sheared and a piece went flying across the room. Must be the same garbage metal they make screws out of, you can’t even drive the screw in with an ordinary screwdriver before the head snaps off.
There’s always the military, they never outsource the dying. Of course, getting people to go fight for a way of life that has been offshored somewhere else might be a little tough.
Until the trade is actually fair and all sides play by the SAME rules, 'free' trade is detrimental to the USA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.