Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Onama establishes Federal Privacy Council as part of massive cyber effort (New Executive Order)
IAPP.org ^ | 02/09/2016 | Sam Pfeifle

Posted on 02/10/2016 1:20:11 PM PST by MarchonDC09122009

Obama establishes Federal Privacy Council as part of massive cyber effort

https://iapp.org/news/a/obama-establishes-federal-privacy-council-as-part-of-massive-cyber-effort/

Obama establishes Federal Privacy Council as part of massive cyber effort

Sam Pfeifle

The Privacy Advisor | Feb 9, 2016

Obama establishes Federal Privacy Council as part of massive cyber effort

As part of his 2017 budget proposal for the United States, President Barack Obama is including $19 billion for cybersecurity efforts, a 35-percent increase over fiscal year 2016. The funds will go toward a Cybersecurity National Action Plan, which includes the hiring of a chief information security officer, a $3.1 billion fund for IT modernization at the federal level, and, perhaps most importantly for privacy professionals, a new executive order establishing a permanent Federal Privacy Council, as announced by Office of Management and Budget Director Shaun Donovan in December.

A White House release says the new council is part of “a groundbreaking effort to enhance how agencies across the federal government protect the privacy of individuals and their freedom. Privacy has been core to our nation from its inception, and in today’s digital age safeguarding privacy is more critical than ever.”

Underscoring the importance of the cyber effort as a whole, President Obama announced his cyber plan with an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal, where privacy received prominent mention in the first paragraph:

    More than any other nation, America is defined by the spirit of innovation, and our dominance in the digital world gives us a competitive advantage in the global economy. However, our advantage is threatened by foreign governments, criminals and lone actors who are targeting our computer networks, stealing trade secrets from American companies and violating the privacy of the American people.

The president’s executive order builds on and reinforces these high-level policy goals. “The proper functioning of government requires the public’s trust,” it reads, “and to maintain that trust the government must strive to uphold the highest standards for collecting, maintaining, and using personal data. Privacy has been at the heart of our government from its inception, and we need it now more than ever.”

However, the speed of technological innovation and the increasingly global marketplace “require that we find even more effective and innovative ways to improve the government’s efforts” in managing privacy, the president writes. And they “demand leadership and enhanced coordination and collaboration among a diverse group of stakeholders and experts.”

Thus, the details of the executive order. It dictates that, within 120 days, Donovan, the director of OMB, will issue a new policy on the role of senior agency officials for privacy (SAOPs, for short). Then, each government agency head will designate (or re-designate) a new SAOP “with the experience and skills necessary to manage an agency-wide privacy program.”

Finally, there is the Federal Privacy Council, which the executive order formally establishes, with the deputy director for management of the OMB as its chair (Andrew Mayock was nominated for the post in December, but doesn't appear to have been confirmed yet). The members of the council will be the SAOPs from 24 separate government agencies, including everyone from the Department of Homeland Security to the National Science Foundation and the Environmental Protection Agency. These members will be tasked with three essential duties:

    Develop recommendations for federal privacy policies.     Coordinate best practices and share ideas.     Recommend plans for hiring, training, and providing professional development for federal employees in the privacy arena.

The Privacy Council will also coordinate closely with the Federal Chief Information Officers Council, along with other councils and groups, like the Chief Financial Officers Council, the Domestic Policy Council, and many others.

Karen Neuman, chief privacy officer at the Department of Homeland Security, and thus likely her agency’s SAOP, will be among the first group to sit on the Federal Privacy Council. In an interview with The Privacy Advisor, she praised the efforts of OMB Senior Advisor for Privacy Marc Groman, CIPP/US, along with her Deputy CPO at DHS, Jonathan Cantor, CIPP/US, CIPP/G, in getting the council established and framing its structure and goals. Groman, especially, she said, has “accomplished a lot” in his short time since re-joining the federal government after his time heading up the Network Advertising Initiative, which followed his role as CPO of the Federal Trade Commission and a number of other federal roles.

“One of the biggest accomplishments,” she said, “is that [the privacy council] really elevates the privacy enterprise throughout the federal government in a manner that’s consistent and allows privacy professionals to engage with leadership in a way that’s really necessary. … They need to be forward thinking about how they’re going to address privacy and really be innovative in the way that they do so. The council is a logical way to accomplish that.”

Neuman said she’s looking forward to sharing best practices and standardizing the way each agency attacks the many privacy issues they face on a daily basis, “even at the level of hiring accomplished and qualified privacy professionals and getting agency buy in.”

Most importantly, Neuman said, “this council will enable the federal privacy enterprise to enter the modern age. The federal government is operating under the auspices of some very old privacy law and interpretations of that law. … Technology is moving at lightning speed, and the way that people interact with that is moving equally fast, and the law just can’t keep up. The council will be well positioned on how to weigh in on bringing those laws into the modern age and allowing privacy professionals to be agile in how they respond. That’s one of the most crucial benefits of this council.”

Quite simply, she said, Groman’s “accomplishment is tremendous. This is a huge, huge achievement. Don’t bury that lede.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: alottohide; bigbrother; cybersecurity; encryption; executive; fedprivacycouncil; internet; lastsecondpardons; nsa; obamaorwell; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: MarchonDC09122009

That dweeb is going to do as much constitutional damage as he can prior to vacating the White House.


21 posted on 02/10/2016 2:14:26 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Incompetence.

Count on it.


22 posted on 02/10/2016 2:16:59 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Marco "Stepford" Rubio.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark

Lol. I appreciated that.


23 posted on 02/10/2016 2:17:13 PM PST by refreshed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009; All
 photo dadez1.jpg

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


24 posted on 02/10/2016 2:21:19 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009
Federal Privacy Council

Whenever the government names legislation or an agency or a program, you can be certain what we get is the exact opposite.

25 posted on 02/10/2016 2:24:46 PM PST by FoxInSocks ("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009; KC_Lion

Why is it I have that tingly feeling on the back of my neck that tells me this ‘privacy council’ will be far more interested in violating my privacy than in protecting it?


26 posted on 02/10/2016 2:27:57 PM PST by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Wants backdoors in encryption systems, but Privacy Council? Clearly, he's trying to set up ways to protect his own criminal activities after he leaves office.

27 posted on 02/10/2016 3:41:28 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: unixfox

This isn’t incompetence, it’s entirely by design.


28 posted on 02/10/2016 4:39:13 PM PST by wastedyears (uchikudake - toki michite - ikiru tame - tokihanate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

$19 BILLION

What do you get for that?


29 posted on 02/10/2016 5:38:15 PM PST by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

Wait, wait, wait.

You mean the same govt that: can’t build a marketplace website for less than a few $Billion, can’t stop identity theft (more likely WON’T)/tax fraud/welfare cheats/tax evasion (some still holding OFFICE, somehow), ‘didn’t know’ about a ‘personal e-mail server’, routinely gets hacked and secrets stolen...is going to ‘get serious’ about security?

Here’s my $50 bet: it gets 40% before it’s scrapped.


30 posted on 02/10/2016 6:43:34 PM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Surveillance is Privacy
War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

I guess Orwell missed one.


31 posted on 02/10/2016 8:27:45 PM PST by Crucial (At the heart all leftidsts is the fear that the truth is bigger than themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Crucial

Exactly


32 posted on 02/10/2016 8:28:45 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mark

OK. You’re practicing some serious voodoo. I came up with the Obama Farewell Speech. That WILL be my favorite.


33 posted on 02/10/2016 8:53:48 PM PST by Crucial (At the heart all leftidsts is the fear that the truth is bigger than themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mark

I just went through all the numbers, you tricky devil!


34 posted on 02/10/2016 8:57:23 PM PST by Crucial (At the heart all leftidsts is the fear that the truth is bigger than themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Good point. The $19 Billion will never be put to the use it is stated for. How much did they spend on the healthcare.org site? Who got all that money? The Secretary of state emailing state secrets on unsecured servers?

Team Obama is looting the treasury and spreading the wealth amongst themselves. I saw a story a while back about some dimrat whining that Obama is not sharing the money he brings in from all the fundraisers he goes to. He is not sharing his stash with his party, but all that money is going somewhere.


35 posted on 02/11/2016 5:36:06 AM PST by Texas resident (The democrat party will destroy our country and they think they won't be affected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; ...

At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son

The biggest killer of mankind

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

What makes you think...

...I'm spying on you?

36 posted on 02/11/2016 7:09:52 AM PST by null and void (This war starts in the spiritual realm-it will end in ours though.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark

Lol


37 posted on 02/11/2016 7:26:11 AM PST by Rusty0604 (1q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009

yet another scheme to siphon money to friends from the treasury


38 posted on 02/11/2016 7:31:16 AM PST by Thibodeaux (leading from behind is following)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

And congress will do nothing


39 posted on 02/11/2016 8:54:53 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MarchonDC09122009; Old Sarge; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; freeangel; kalee; ...

Onama establishes Federal Privacy Council as part of massive cyber effort (New Executive Order)

Check out article, # 14 , # 19 , # 27 .

40 posted on 02/11/2016 9:19:24 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson