Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz Says He'll 'Never Have a Plane' With His Name On It
YouTube ^ | Jan 9, 2016 | Catchy News

Posted on 02/01/2016 11:41:17 PM PST by WhiskeyX

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Vision Thing
Maple Leaf One

LOL

61 posted on 02/02/2016 3:38:41 AM PST by Salamander (I made friends with a lot of people in the danger zone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
Ted Cruz Says He'll 'Never Have a Plane' With His Name On It

If he wins the Presidency, Lloyd Blankfein will get to brand Air Force One.

62 posted on 02/02/2016 3:50:05 AM PST by Stentor ("Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute." Robert Goodloe Harper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vision Thing
All Cruz has is a ground game in Iowa

Yep and it showed up last night.

What did The donald show up at, tied for third with the other loser.

I do want to think Trump for being a mouth piece for the causes of conservatism but he is not one by a long shot and the sooner voters realize it the better.

63 posted on 02/02/2016 3:52:04 AM PST by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Stentor

Canuck Teddy will never win the Presidency as he’ll be destroyed by Hellry/Media or in the courts by the D’rats for not being a NBC.

Rubio/Hellry - both will complete the destruction of America with amnesty for 40+ MILLION ILLEGAL ALIEN INVADERS.


64 posted on 02/02/2016 3:59:41 AM PST by newfreep (TRUMP & <S>Cruz</S> 2016 - "Evil succeeds when good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: eartick

“What did The donald show up at, tied for third with the other loser.”

It’s a three way tie: 5 delegates for Cruz, 5 delegates for Trump, 5 delegates for Rubio, and 1 delegate for Carson. It’s a real pity Ted Cruz is ineligible to be a lawful President, because he and Marco Rubio are naturalized citizens and not natural born citizens.


65 posted on 02/02/2016 4:02:32 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

66 posted on 02/02/2016 4:04:41 AM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

That’s good because if he did , it wouldn’t have been bought from the earnings of any private business he built


67 posted on 02/02/2016 4:06:57 AM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Trump has borrowed heavily to fund those ventures, even the ones that went bankrupt.


68 posted on 02/02/2016 4:09:19 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Oh, well. He’s got my vote now.


69 posted on 02/02/2016 4:11:07 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

A post about this was posted a month ago. Not exactly breaking news.

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3381355/posts


70 posted on 02/02/2016 4:30:47 AM PST by justlittleoleme (Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

“Oh, well. He’s got my vote now.”

Not really. The precinct caucus is only the first step. By the time the other states do their primaries, there is no telling what the Iowa conventions and their delegates will vote for by the time they get to the Iowa state convention. Then there is the national convention, and with tied votes like these, there is no telling what kind of backroom rule changes and delegate tampering can take place with the GOPe efforts to inject their candidate ahead of the caucus and primary winners. This is why Jeb Bush refused to abandon his campaign before the Iowa caucus and New Hampshire primary. He is trying to stay in the race long enough to get to a divided Republican national convention, where magical things have been known to happen.


71 posted on 02/02/2016 4:35:05 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: justlittleoleme

“A post about this was posted a month ago. Not exactly breaking news.”

It was not posted as breaking news or news. It was posted as elections/politics and a humorous companion story to the other candidate airplane and bus stories and Air Force One and Marine One documentaries.


72 posted on 02/02/2016 4:38:15 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Yeah...because he’s only ever known Government. It might have Goldman Sachs on the wing...but never Cruz.


73 posted on 02/02/2016 4:39:20 AM PST by Solson (Trump plays to win. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX
7 6 6 is the way Iowa has it posted.

For NBC statement I believe it is the mother that makes the child a NBC.

I believe in the old saying, mama's baby, daddy's maybe and before DNA testing that was the true test of parentage.

If you have another way of proving besides chastity belts and watching performance of the act, let me know.

So Senator Cruz would be NBC but I am not sure about Senator Rubio if his mother was a Citizen when he was born or if she received her naturalization papers after he was born.

74 posted on 02/02/2016 4:41:31 AM PST by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Cruz doesn’t need a plane of his own. His corporate masters can provide him one of theirs anytime he needs it. Goldman Sachs probably has a nice fleet of Lears.


75 posted on 02/02/2016 4:47:30 AM PST by stratboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Well, Iowans bought the Cruz Elmer Gantry act but will it play in New Hampshire and South Carolina.

I don’t think so, Iowa hasn’t picked a winner in NOW SEVENTEEN years.


76 posted on 02/02/2016 4:51:18 AM PST by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eartick

“7 6 6 is the way Iowa has it posted.”

It is hard to imagine how you missed the hundreds of prior postings by myself and dozens of others, but just for you here is some of it yet again.

“For NBC statement I believe it is the mother that makes the child a NBC.”

That is quite impossible. What makes a person a natural born citizen is the fact that the child is born within the jurisdiction and therefore the sovereignty, allegiance, and obedience to the one and only domestic sovereign. Any child who is born outside the jurisdiction, sovereignty, and duty of obedience to the domestic sovereign and/or with a duty of obedience to one or both parents who have a duty of allegiance and obedience to a foreign sovereign, is born with a divided allegiance, divided duty of obedience, and a divided loyalty to more than one sovereign; and such a child cannot acquire nationality by any other means other than the legal fiction of a statutory law, manmade law, and artificial law known as an act of naturalization that confers at birth or after birth certain capacities in law already enjoyed by actual natural born citizens who acquired citizenship by birth with undivided allegiance or duties of obedience to any other sovereign. Note, this is the way in which natural born citizenship and naturalized citizenship has been handled for thousands of years back to the City of Athens in Ancient Greece. It is confirmed in the Naturalization Act of 1541, Calvin’s Case 1608 and Sir Edward Coke, the case law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952, the U.S. State Department Foreign Affairs manual administering naturalization law, and the Constitution. See examples such as:

66 Stat. Public Law 414 - June 27, 1952. TITLE III - NATIONALITY AND NATURALIZATION. Chapter 1 - Nationality at Birth and by Collective Naturalization. NATIONALS AND CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AT BIRTH. Sec. 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth; . . . (7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at lest five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, That any periods of honorable service in the Armed Forces of the United States by such citizen parent may be included in computing the physical presence requirements of this paragraph.

U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 7
Consular Affairs. 7 FAM 1151 INTRODUCTION... b. 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(23); INA 101(a)(23)) defines naturalization as the conferring of nationality of a state upon a person after birth by any means whatsoever. . . For the purposes of this subchapter naturalization includes:... (5) “Automatic” acquisition of U.S. citizenship after birth, a form of naturalization by certain children born abroad to U.S. citizen parents or children adopted abroad by U.S. citizen parents.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. said “A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized....”

“I believe in the old saying, mama’s baby, daddy’s maybe and before DNA testing that was the true test of parentage.”

No person born abroad is a natural born citizen without some form of diplomatic immunity to prevent the child from being born under the duty of allegiance and obedience to the foreign sovereign. Without diplomatic immunity, a child born abroad is alien born and acquires U.S. citizenship only by naturalization at birth or after birth. Ted Cruz acquired U.S. citizenship by the authority of the above quoted Public Law in the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952. Ted Cruz was born in Canada, a foreign jurisdiction, with foreign Canadian citizenship, with a duty of allegiance to a foreign sovereign; so it is utterly impossible for Ted Cruz to have been born with a duty of allegiance and obedience to only the sovereign United States as required to be a natural born citizen, a person who could acquire no other citizenship but U.S. citizenship by birth.

“If you have another way of proving besides chastity belts and watching performance of the act, let me know.”

The parentage of Ted Cruse is not relevant except to qualify him for eligibility to become a naturalized U.S. citizen. Without diplomatic immunity, it makes no difference whatsoever whether he had one or two U.S citizen parents when born abroad, meaning outside U.S. jurisdiction; because all such children born abroad can acquire U.S. citizenship only by naturalization and in no other way.

“So Senator Cruz would be NBC but I am not sure about Senator Rubio if his mother was a Citizen when he was born or if she received her naturalization papers after he was born.”

Due to his birth abroad, it is physically impossible for Ted Cruz to acquire U.S. citizenship by any means other than naturalization, which makes Ted Cruz ineligible to be a lawful President. Marco Rubio has almost the same problem of ineligibility as Ted Cruz, except his acquisition of citizenship by naturalization at birth was authorized by paragraph (1) instead of paragraph (7) of the same section of the U.S. Immigration Act of 1952. Marco Rubio’s parents were both alien Cuban citizens when Marco Rubio was born in the jurisdiction of the United States.


77 posted on 02/02/2016 5:29:36 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Yeah, but John Adams is dead. I like the story about when Jefferson first moved in to the largely-unfinished White House, with Merriweather Lewis as his only real staff. And how Jefferson had to bring his own horses and pay for their stables and care because Congress had ended funding that had provided that for the president. It wasn’t the job of the government to pay for that, they reasoned.


78 posted on 02/02/2016 5:48:06 AM PST by Southside_Chicago_Republican (If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stratboy

“Cruz doesn’t need a plane of his own. His corporate masters can provide him one of theirs anytime he needs it. Goldman Sachs probably has a nice fleet of Lears.”

By the end of this year or next year Goldman Sachs may have a new CEO and fewer Lear jets, after the biggest stock market crash in history.


79 posted on 02/02/2016 6:08:23 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I am really upset about the mailer that Cruz campaign sent out.

First—I consider it an invasion of my privacy that such information was assembled & printed.

Then, the amount of money it took to find all the parcel owners—neighbors—of each voter & print such individual mailers is staggering.

I live rural. We all depend on each other for a number of things. Pitting neighbors against each other isn’t very smart. I won’t vote for Cruz.

I live in Nevada. I have never gone to the caucus to vote, voting only in th3e November elections. However, this year, I am moving a meeting on that night so I can attend the caucus in my valley & go vote.

I would like to point out tht it is up to the party to notify voters of where we can go to caucus. I have lived here almost 11 years—3 Presidential cycles. I have NEVER received a single bit if mailed information about where I am supposed to go to vote. I had to dig to find out the info for this year.

The GOP is dropping the ball, IMO. AGAIN.


80 posted on 02/02/2016 6:44:32 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson