Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Nomination
The New York Times ^ | 1/30/2016 | New York Times Editorial Board

Posted on 01/31/2016 11:53:31 AM PST by Lazamataz

For the past painful year, the Republican presidential contenders have been bombarding Americans with empty propaganda slogans and competing, bizarrely, to present themselves as the least experienced person for the most important elected job in the world. Democratic primary voters, on the other hand, after a substantive debate over real issues, have the chance to nominate one of the most broadly and deeply qualified presidential candidates in modern history.

Hillary Clinton would be the first woman nominated by a major party. She served as a senator from a major state (New York) and as secretary of state — not to mention her experience on the national stage as first lady with her brilliant and flawed husband, President Bill Clinton. The Times editorial board has endorsed her three times for federal office — twice for Senate and once in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary — and is doing so again with confidence and enthusiasm.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016endorsements; cultureofcorruption; hillary2016; hillaryendorsement; nytcorrupt; nytendorsement; nytforhillary; nytimesbias; unelectedcopresident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
The New York Times just endorsed a multiple felon who may not even make the summer without indictment.

They don't care. Hell, they covered up Stalin's Holodomar and held Adolph Hitler as the 'Rising Star' of Germany. They have often willingly compromised national military secrets, seemingly in an intentional bid to harm America.

These people are pure, unadulterated evil. If Satan himself appeared on the political landscape, the Editorial Board of the New York Times would plead for us to give his ideas "a fair chance".

In any national convulsion, any United-States-wide cataclysm, the New York Times CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO EMERGE ON THE OTHER SIDE.

1 posted on 01/31/2016 11:53:31 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The NY Slimes endorsed Clinton? Gosh, what a surprise!


2 posted on 01/31/2016 11:55:23 AM PST by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

3 posted on 01/31/2016 11:56:25 AM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

One dinosaur comes out for another.


4 posted on 01/31/2016 11:57:50 AM PST by r_barton (We the People of the United States...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

IOWs, the NYT is going to do everything they can to not report on the server or the foundation.

As if it’s possible for them to cover it any less than they already have.


5 posted on 01/31/2016 11:58:32 AM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r_barton

They are utterly repuslive, evil, hideous people.

Hell, they aren’t even people.

I bet you a dollar that actual demons work there... real-life Satanic minions.


6 posted on 01/31/2016 11:59:19 AM PST by Lazamataz (I'm an Islamophobe??? Well, good. When it comes to Islam, there's plenty to Phobe about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Tough choice for the NYT to make between endorsing an aging Communist or a corrupt liberal fascist.


7 posted on 01/31/2016 11:59:58 AM PST by The Great RJ (�Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money.� Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Laz, would you hit it?

Sorry, couldn’t resist.


8 posted on 01/31/2016 12:00:17 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
IOWs, the NYT is going to do everything they can to not report on the server or the foundation. As if it's possible for them to cover it any less than they already have.

They could anti-report it. They could use white font on black paper.

9 posted on 01/31/2016 12:00:21 PM PST by Lazamataz (I'm an Islamophobe??? Well, good. When it comes to Islam, there's plenty to Phobe about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The bitter truth is that Bully Hillary2016 is worse than BULLY Hillary2008. Once again Bully Hillary is mincing around getting schlonged.

Bully Hill put some ice on it!

Bill Clinton is a 5 star general in the WAR ON WOMEN and BULLY Hillary is his Goebbels!!!!!

Clintoon the "affluenza" serial rapist!


10 posted on 01/31/2016 12:00:46 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Trump i s the wrecking ball destroying GOPe, FAUX & their bs mediot conspirators & beltway pundits!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The New York Times has been delightful over the past almost 8 years with a criminal President and an organized criminal enterprise running the Federal Government. Hillary Clinton is the perfect candidate to continue this state of affairs. They really like criminals, you know.


11 posted on 01/31/2016 12:00:52 PM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I sense you are causing a disturbance in the force.

And now your neighbors all know!

12 posted on 01/31/2016 12:01:11 PM PST by DoughtyOne (the Free Republic Caucus: what FReepers are thinking, 100s or 1000s of them. It's up to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
If Hillary fails to win the nomination, I predict that the Democrats will publicly turn on the Clintons and destroy them.

Bill is no longer th emedia darling. They will no longer cover for him or protect him.

It wil be wonderful to watch Bill, Hillary and little Chelsea get ripped apart in the media.

13 posted on 01/31/2016 12:01:36 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (With Trump & Cruz, America can't lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Just look for the choice that would hurt America more, and the evil twisted fasci-communist thugs at the Times will take that decision.


14 posted on 01/31/2016 12:01:38 PM PST by Lazamataz (I'm an Islamophobe??? Well, good. When it comes to Islam, there's plenty to Phobe about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

It’s a ‘Titanic’ thing.

Let her be the one at the helm..

She ‘earned’ it ..

One email at a time.


15 posted on 01/31/2016 12:02:06 PM PST by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

There should have been a barf alert.

The NYT has got to know they are preaching to a very small crowd of total bafoons and far left socialist/commie’s.


16 posted on 01/31/2016 12:02:40 PM PST by redfreedom (Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

I am not surprised at the New York Times would endorse Hillary Clinton for president. I am surprised, perhaps somewhat naively, that they would write it in such a slobbering and fawning way. Describing Bill Clinton as “brilliant but flawed” is over the top, even for the Times.


17 posted on 01/31/2016 12:03:25 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The NYet Times found some kool-aid to drink, it would seem.

Electric or Guyana, does it really matter which?


18 posted on 01/31/2016 12:03:52 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Obama is more supportive of Iran's right to defend its territorial borders than he is of the USA's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

And those donations to their slush fund will also dry up.

Why pay to play with someone with no power?


19 posted on 01/31/2016 12:07:18 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

The woman should be in prison and being held accountable off the media, instead the media endorses her, she runs for office, and the idiots out there will vote for her!!!

Simply stunning


20 posted on 01/31/2016 12:07:20 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson