Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Campaign Manager: Trump Will Debate Cruz Once Judge Rules Him Eligible To Run
BuzzFeed News ^ | 01/28/2016 | Christopher Massie

Posted on 01/28/2016 2:26:49 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Donald Trump's campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said on Thursday that his candidate would be "happy" to debate Ted Cruz once the Texas senator gets a federal judge to rule him eligible to run for president.

"Once you've gotten that ruling from the federal judge and you're the last man standing in this presidential contest next to Donald Trump, we'll be happy to have a debate with you one-on-one, anywhere you want, because that's the way the system works," Lewandowski said. "But, as it stands right now, we don't even know if Ted Cruz is legally eligible to run for president of the United States."

Trump and his supporters have argued that Cruz, who was born in Canada to a U.S. citizen, is not natural born and therefore ineligible to run for president under the Constitution.

Cruz challenged Trump to debate him one-on-one after Trump announced that he would not be attending the Fox News Republican presidential debate Thursday night because of objections to the presence of anchor Megyn Kelly and a statement Fox issued in response to his complaints. "What this is, is a publicity stunt by Senator Cruz who is continuing to fall in the polls in the state of Iowa," Lewandowski told Boston radio host Jeff Kuhner, before unleashing a slew of attacks at Cruz, arguing that he had used "dark money donors" through his super PAC to offer a donation to charity if Trump agreed to the debate.

"If Ted Cruz were able to disclose the loans that he's taken out from Goldman Sachs and Citi, then maybe he would use his own money for this, but instead he's using super PAC money which I don't even know if he can do legally," Lewandowski said, referring to loans Cruz took out during his 2012 run for Senate that he did not disclose in campaign filings. "And the bottom line is, you know what we've said to Ted Cruz, go into court, seek a declaratory judgment to find out if you're even legally eligible to run for president of the United States." In the interview, Lewandowski addressed his remark that Megyn Kelly had a "rough couple of days after that last debate" and "would hate to have her go through that again," which some at Fox News interpreted as a threat.

"That's not a threat. It's a factual statement," Lewandowski said. "And the bottom line, was, she did have a rough couple days after the debate because what she did during that first presidential debate was she made sure the debate was about her and not about the candidates who were actually on the stage."

Toward the end of the interview, Lewandowski took another shot at Cruz, this time over Cruz's criticism of Trump's support for eminent domain. Lewandowski said that eminent domain would be required to build the Keystone Pipeline, which Cruz supports. "The Keystone Pipeline, as you know, starts where Ted Cruz was born, in the country of Canada, and runs right down to where he lives now, in the state of Texas, and eminent domain is an issue that you know what unfortunately, sometimes you need to use it to get projects like that done," Lewandowski said.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthers; canadian; cruz; dividedloyalty; dualcitizenship; naturalborn; tinfoilhat; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-327 next last
To: skeeter
"I figured Trump would find some childish way to abstain."

What do you want to bet that Cruz shuts up about a one on one debate?

61 posted on 01/28/2016 2:39:50 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

I think Trump has a point. If he’s alleging Cruz is ineligible, why should be waste his time debating him?


62 posted on 01/28/2016 2:39:53 PM PST by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trump has a good point. Cruz has a lot of unfinished business he needs to clean up before asking for the support of the American people. He currently is in violation of the law after filing a false FEC campaign disclosure document, he declaratory judgement confirming his eligibility to run, etc.

Cruz should take care of his own business before playing these talking point games with Trump.


63 posted on 01/28/2016 2:40:03 PM PST by lodi90 (TRUMP Force 1 lifting off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

Im suing Trump to prove he is eligible


64 posted on 01/28/2016 2:40:10 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

65 posted on 01/28/2016 2:40:26 PM PST by perfect_rovian_storm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thats going to leave a mark. Might be one of the closing moves in a larger gambit too. I have a dream that America awakens.


Well said.

VERY well said.

closing moves in a larger gambit

You are so correct.


66 posted on 01/28/2016 2:40:40 PM PST by samtheman (Elect Trump, Build Wall. End Censorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The way it is now is if Cruz has to prove he’s an American citizen he shows them his mama’s birth certificate. He has never applied for nationalization papers. I’ve heard him say it. He says “my mother was born in the states, therefore I am a US citizen”. Well, OK Teddy, if you say so. HaHaHaHaHa. If that’s the case anyone can say they’re an American and not have to prove it.


67 posted on 01/28/2016 2:40:47 PM PST by NKP_Vet (In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle,stand like a rock ~ T, Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Its the logical decision.

But the mouth frothers won’t accept it, to them they are trying to make America a land of looter laws, if he gets away with it so can i!


68 posted on 01/28/2016 2:41:02 PM PST by Daniel Ramsey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

McCain was sued by crackpots over eligibility too. It was a meaningless incident that had no effect on anything.


69 posted on 01/28/2016 2:41:29 PM PST by JediJones ("Beautiful, famous, successful, married - I've had them all, secretly." -Trump on women in 2007 book)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
 photo pippen_zpsm5pn1fmk.gif
70 posted on 01/28/2016 2:41:50 PM PST by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wny

And still winning....


71 posted on 01/28/2016 2:41:59 PM PST by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Trump’s team is brilliant.


72 posted on 01/28/2016 2:42:17 PM PST by Rennes Templar (I'm pro gun control: keep your guns under your control at all times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Trump knows exactly what can/cannot be done, and he got exactly what he wanted done with the statement.


73 posted on 01/28/2016 2:42:29 PM PST by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is a perfectly legitimate statement. If Trump has doubts about whether or not Cruz is eligible, why debate him.

Cruz should have gotten that issue taken care of before he even started his campaign.


74 posted on 01/28/2016 2:42:31 PM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

He is, read his book.


75 posted on 01/28/2016 2:42:36 PM PST by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: hawaiianninja

“I may be wrong, but I seem to recall reading or hearing some legal pundits comment that it may behoove Cruz to “legally” set the matter straight.”

It’s not possible to “set the matter straight” in any way that would preclude the dem’s trying to sue. Even if they did sue, they would lose, and the case would take years.


76 posted on 01/28/2016 2:43:24 PM PST by mtrott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

What, make himself look like an even bigger @$$? Yep, he did that.


77 posted on 01/28/2016 2:43:29 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Trump to McCain - "Pass the strawberries".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trump just keeps on pushing....... me away. Settle Cruz’s eligibility yourself!


78 posted on 01/28/2016 2:43:31 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

I want to like Trump


No you dont


79 posted on 01/28/2016 2:43:37 PM PST by samtheman (Elect Trump, Build Wall. End Censorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Of course not. But, it would be much easier to bat down the critics if Cruz has legal clarification.


80 posted on 01/28/2016 2:43:38 PM PST by hawaiianninja (Palm note to self: "Prepare for some serious 2016 house cleaning. Trump/Cruz or Cruz/Trump 2016!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-327 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson