Posted on 11/25/2015 4:06:01 AM PST by HomerBohn
Global warming is the cause of terrorism in the Middle East and around the world according to Martin O'Malley, Bernie Sanders, Barack Obama, and other Democrats. Let's add in the Prince of Wales. With a straight face they make this claim, ignoring any and all other evidence to the contrary.
But if that is so, if global warming causes terrorism, then I think the Democrats need to answer this question: why does global warming only turn Muslims into terrorists?
There are Jews in the Middle East and Africa. There are Christians in the Middle East and Africa. There are animists, Zoroastrians, Hindus, and others. But only certain Muslims, often from wealthy families, turn into terrorists. The Jews, Christians, animists, Zoroastrians, Hindus, and the rest never seem to be affected by global warming in that way.
Perhaps instead of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to explore why lesbians are fat, the federal government should spend some cash on why global warming turns only Muslims into terrorists.
Or maybe it doesn't.
Because in the old days, the Middle East was a lush, fertile valley where lemonade springs bubbled up beside gumdrop trees, and unicorns frolicked in the meadows. Then Western civilization emerged and men began burning coal (the “Devil Stone”) to power their fire-belching industrial machines. In a short hundred years, the Middle East, home to most of the world’s peace-loving muslim faithful, went from sylvan paradise to wasteland, because the industrial machinery of the West focused all the sun’s rays on the Unicorn Valley and burned it all up. This drove the peace-loving muslims to seek new homes and to try to restore the paradise they once knew. But the Orges of the West resisted their peaceful efforts so the pious muslim hordes were forced to defend themselves.
See?
I believe you are incorrect on your date for the end of the Little Ice Age.
According to Encyclopedia Britannica: “Today some scientists use it to distinguish only the period 1500-1850, when mountain glaciers expanded to their greatest extent, but the phrase is more commonly applied to the broader period 1300-1850.”
That being said, I cannot disagree with the rest of your comment.
Nothing more than a diversion generated by pathological liars with a political agenda to subjugate the masses.
They think that it’s a pretest of where they are headed when they die/arekilled (HE**).
So there may in fact be something to this theory.
Hmmmmmm
Still, whatever weather source you use, the connection between Muslim aggression and weather patterns in 1800 or 2015 is purely coincidental.
The only time we have NOT had widespread Muslim aggression since Mad Mo came on the scene is during periods of major smack downs such as the crusades, the years after major battles such as Tours (732), Lepanto (1571) and Vienna (1529 & 1683) or colonization (1860-1945). Colonization was, by far, the most effective strategy but has its consequences in allowing savage immigration back into the homelands of the former colonial powers.
Why would they do that. . .other than being stupid.
Erick Erickson hit a home run with this one... I'll be using it tomorrow too...
Wow. . .who knew. . .
I certainly couldn’t eek out an existence there...nor in the North Pole! I couldn’t do extreme heat nor extreme cold.
Your post reminds me of the Sam Kinison bit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0q4o58pKwA
Forgot all about him and that skit.
Excellent. Funny. And so very true.
“But the reality is that the Little Ice Age ended about a century earlier; the Dark Age mentality of Islam had not.”
I like that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.