Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Woodrow Wilson Cost My Grandfather
New York Times ^ | November 24, 2015 | By Gordon J. Davis

Posted on 11/24/2015 10:55:44 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee

OVER the last week, a growing number of students at Princeton have demanded that the university confront the racist legacy of Woodrow Wilson, who served as its president before becoming New Jersey’s governor and the 28th president of the United States. Among other things, the students are demanding that Wilson’s name be removed from university facilities.

Wilson, a Virginia-born Democrat, is mostly remembered as a progressive, internationalist statesman, a benign and wise leader, a father of modern American political science and one of our nation’s great presidents.

But he was also an avowed racist. And unlike many of his predecessors and successors in the White House, he put that racism into action through public policy. Most notably, his administration oversaw the segregation of the federal government, destroying the careers of thousands of talented and accomplished black civil servants — including John Abraham Davis, my paternal grandfather. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: history
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: DoodleDawg
but your precious Confederacy held on to it long after Lincoln was dead and gone.

Huh? The Confederacy was overthrown before Lincoln died.

41 posted on 11/24/2015 1:12:04 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg
I read recently that some officer training camps were integrated during WWI. Apparently, there was no Army-wide policy, so the commander of each camp determined whether facilities and training were racially integrated.

The army as a whole was segregated with black soldiers limited to all black regiments. That existed before, during, and after World War I so I don't think that there wouldn't be an army-wide policy on segregating training camps as well.

42 posted on 11/24/2015 1:12:50 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
Huh? The Confederacy was overthrown before Lincoln died.

That would come as a surprise to Jeff Davis and the Confederate soldiers who were fighting after Lincoln's death.

43 posted on 11/24/2015 1:13:51 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: theoilpainter
Next up, George Washington, and the movement to remove "Washington" from "Washington D.C.

I suspect Washington might even lead that movement, given what the once proud city which bears his name now represents.

He would likely campaign to have it renamed something like "Gomorrah-On-The-Potomac" and be done with the stinking place...

44 posted on 11/24/2015 1:16:09 PM PST by Gritty (The Barbarians Are Inside, And There Are No Gates. So screw the candlelight vigil. - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Wilson gave us the Federal Reserve and the Income Tax. Nuff said.


45 posted on 11/24/2015 1:38:41 PM PST by Newfy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Jefferson Davis didn't want to accept the reality that it was over, but the other Confederate commanders surrendered as soon as they could after they heard that Lee had surrendered (5 days before Lincoln was shot).

I once ran across a lawsuit from Mississippi, I think it was. A man was accused of fraud because he went and bought something with Confederate money as soon as he had heard that Lee had surrendered but before it was widely known--the implication was that the seller would have refused to accept the Confederate money if he had realized that Lee had already surrendered.

46 posted on 11/24/2015 2:34:21 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Gritty

They could always rename it after Booker T. Washington...except that Booker was not radical enough by present-day standards.


47 posted on 11/24/2015 2:35:53 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; GOPsterinMA; ExTexasRedhead

Woodrow Wilson was a horrible President in some ways. He was a racist and Klan sympathizer and he helped inflict the horrible Treaty of Versailles. The Klan grew during his Presidency and lynching increased.

That being said, he did get some good workplace safety laws passed for factories, which were dangerous hellholes back in the day.


48 posted on 11/24/2015 4:00:43 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (The barbarians are inside because there are no gaits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I think it’s AWESOME libs are targeting one of their own for once.


49 posted on 11/24/2015 5:36:23 PM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Appomattox was April 9th. Lincoln died April 15th.


50 posted on 11/24/2015 5:50:43 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
Appomattox was April 9th. Lincoln died April 15th.

Johnston surrendered April 26, Richard Taylor surrendered May 4th, Kirby Smith surrendered May 26. What's your point?

51 posted on 11/24/2015 5:53:53 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
My point was to refute your rediculous statement, which in case you have forgotten was:

"but your precious Confederacy held on to it long after Lincoln was dead and gone".

The Confederacy died at Appomattox Courthouse (and the principles of the American Revoloution along with it). You can say it lasted another month because some units hadn't formally surrendered yet if you want. But that hardly supports your remark.

52 posted on 11/24/2015 6:03:00 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

[That being said, he did get some good workplace safety laws passed for factories, which were dangerous hellholes back in the day.]

Wilson’s view of foreign policy was one generally adopted by almost all proceeding presidents.

Wikipedia:

Wilsonianism or Wilsonian are words used to describe a certain type of ideological perspectives on foreign policy. The term comes from the ideology of United States President Woodrow Wilson and his famous Fourteen Points that he believed would help create world peace if implemented.

Common principles that are often associated with “Wilsonianism” include:

*Advocacy of the spread of democracy[1]

*Advocacy of the spread of capitalism[2]

*Opposition to isolationism and non-interventionism[3]

*Pro-imperialism,[4] in favor of intervention to further national self-interest.[5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilsonianism


53 posted on 11/24/2015 6:42:38 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

And what he failed to achieve the Chinamen decided to do for themselves.

I still say that word btw, I also say Negro. And Indian, both kinds! And Oriental, for those who are not bona fide Chinamen.


54 posted on 11/24/2015 6:47:16 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

Booker T Washington was a self hating Uncle tom by today’s SJW standards


55 posted on 11/24/2015 8:14:38 PM PST by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: greene66

One of the biggest boosters of Woodrow Wilson was none other than Richard Milhous Nixon, who in later years dropped his middle name. And least Woodrow kept the middle name but didn’t use the first name “Thomas”.


56 posted on 11/24/2015 8:39:30 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Newfy

I think the 16th Amendment had already been ratified maybe days before Wilson took office. He had nothing directly to do with it. The American people are huge backers of income taxes so long as they can “sock it to the rich”.


57 posted on 11/24/2015 8:41:28 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

My grandfather protected Taft. He was in the Secret Service then. He hated Wilson.


58 posted on 11/24/2015 10:32:53 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee
Woodrow Wilson was the Father of Progressism.

That he should be reviled by Progressivism's hopelessly naive children is not something with which we should interfere.

We should instead pop some more popcorn!

59 posted on 11/24/2015 10:43:00 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

What about the two Johnsons, Andrew and Lyndon? Both are strong competitors for the title of worst president. But my vote goes to the incumbent!


60 posted on 11/24/2015 10:46:06 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson