You had better never seek it, lest this be you.
The Feral government cannot be trusted. One iota.
“The DOJ tracks people who still have registered weapons despite bans for mental health problems, restraining orders, or certain criminal convictions.”
Odd...I’ve been told that gun registration has nothing to do with grabbing guns.
LOL. No doubt he has other guns where the Feds will never find them. People better wise up and learn how where to keep their guns “safe” from the GUNstOpo.
The crux of this is they don't like anyone owning guns. They seized the guns even though they didn't charge him. It seems to me if they had a complaint that was legally actionable, the warrant (if there even was on) would have stipulated such. The article implies that he wasn't 'allowed' to own guns because of "mental health issues" but doesn't say what the 'issues' were/are.
NEVER tell the government or even local authorities what you own let the incompetent mother effers figure that out on their own, NEVER talk about or brag to your neighbors, either.
Why and who adjudged 59-year-old Albert Sheakalee as having mental issues. Lets see some facts.
Just owning forearms is not enough reason to say a person has mental issues.
And how many schools, theaters, shopping malls and concert halls has he attacked?........................
The better find a charge or else they would have to compensate his family the dollar amount of the items seized wouldn’t they?
Think you need help?
You had better never seek it, lest this be you.
The Feral government cannot be trusted. One iota.
And it is one of the FIRST questions they ask you when applying for a security clearance.
Psychological poop is not just poop. It is a poop swastika on your background wall.
This is why you should never “register” a firearm or answer any physician’s questions regarding mental health or depression.
but hey ... we all know the media can't think, why should we expect math skills ?
...as he rubbed his hands together and salivated in anticipation of selecting some choice specimens for his own collection...
Amen!
A careful re-reading of the second amendment does not reveal any reason for him to be forbidden to own guns. It shows no restriction on the crazy or the freed felon, who are as entitled to self-defense as the rest of us. Anyone who should not own weapons should not be running around loose.
In my opinion, to be found mentally incompetent to own a weapon should require a jury trial.
Unstable people should not be allowed to own guns. I'm 100% for stable, responsible people to own them.
We've had one suicide in our family, and it was touch and go if others might be killed. Now other family members have begun stockpiling weapons they didn't have money for before. One is on and off of drugs, has been involuntarily committed but past the five year limit. There are other mental health issues with others involved, not to mention securing them away from small children. In my state, if you pass the five-year mark, you can still own guns but doesn't take the drugs into account.
Because of their irresponsible and dangerous and unpredictable activities, I have broken all ties with them, and informed them of my reasons.
If the man has become as unstable as it sounds, I don't understand how people can support his ownership of that many guns and blame the government. I don't know how to compensate the man for his monetary loss, however.
sometime before 1/20/2017, the desire to own a gun will be deemed to be prima fascia evidence of mental illness.
my story is they’re all in a safe in another jursdiction. any other questions are questions about guns outside of the questioners jurisdiction. none of those questions need to be answered.
500 guns and a hundred thousand rounds of ammunition is $100,000 - $200,000 of property for the state to confiscate.
That should be enough for a good lawyer to contest, arguing that the property can be disposed of for the benefit of the owner or his family.
I believe there was a Supreme Court case on this recently, that affirmed that the property could not be confiscated simply because “guns!”.
“I believe it makes the neighborhood safer as well as the state of California,” said DOJ Special Agent-In-Charge Michael Haroldsen.
Yeah? Who is making it safe from the DOJ?