Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump panic: GOP establishment floats Romney 3rd-party candidacy
wnd.com ^ | 9/18/15 | Garth Kant

Posted on 09/18/2015 1:57:10 PM PDT by cotton1706

WASHINGTON – The Empire strikes back?

First, the Republican Party made Donald Trump sign an oath of loyalty by pledging to support its eventual presidential nominee and not run as a third-party candidate.

Now, the establishment GOP may be planning to do the very thing it made Trump promise not to do: bolt from the Republican party and run a third-party campaign.

Mark McKinnon, former President George W. Bush’s chief media strategist, suggested a scenario to NPR the GOP elite might follow if it looks like Trump will win the party’s presidential nomination.

“The Republican establishment completely freaks out. They get together and say, this is unacceptable, but it looks like it’s going to happen. So we go off, and we create a new Republican Party as an Independent candidacy and draft somebody who’s tanned, rested and ready to go and with a lot of money, somebody like Mitt Romney,” speculated McKinnon.

Former Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas, was floored by that.

“I think its absolutely hypocritical and crazy for the moderates to sit there and lecture conservatives about a third party and then turn around and practically advocate that for one of their own,” he told WND.

Stockman pointed out that Republicans don’t come any more moderate than McKinnon himself, considering he was an adviser to Democrats before he was tapped to help elect Bush in 2000.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: New York; US: Texas; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; elections; garthkant; markmckinnon; massachusetts; mittwit; newyork; polygamyparty; romney; romney3rdparty; romneycare; romneycareparty; romneymarriage; statismparty; stevestockman; texas; trump; utah; whirlednutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last
To: Pearls Before Swine

Really. The GOP would rather see the Democrats in power than have Bush lose to Trump. Cut off nose; spite face.


21 posted on 09/18/2015 2:04:50 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Beware the tyranny of the easily offended. (Stossel))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Remember that the republican Establishment did this before, in 1980 with John Anderson.

What Establishment? Reagan had the party behind him when he ran, Chafee, Jeffords, Specter, Hatfield, and the rest.

Anderson was a quixotic outrider who got more support from Democrats and Independents than Republicans, let along elected Republican officials.

22 posted on 09/18/2015 2:05:05 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Are they smoking crack?! TRUMP WOULD WIN IN A LANDSLIDE!


23 posted on 09/18/2015 2:05:12 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Mark McKinnon already floated this brain-dead idea a week ago. Me thinks he's angling for a consultant fee (aka the usual GOPE "protection racket") from Trump.

Or, how about this wild scenario: Trump actually starts to get enough delegates to win the nomination. Then, irony of ironies, rather than Trump running as a third party, the GOP establishment decides to pull a Roosevelt, and re-creates the Republican Party under an independent banner.

See: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/11/why-the-donald-can-go-the-distance.html

24 posted on 09/18/2015 2:06:09 PM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Why doesn’t Jeb just run as Hilary’s Vice President??


25 posted on 09/18/2015 2:06:17 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Hey DJ, cue up The Eagles’ ‘Desparado’ please.


26 posted on 09/18/2015 2:06:36 PM PDT by Vision Thing ("Community Organizer" is a shorter way of saying "Commie Unity Organizer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Donald signed the ‘Loyalty Oath’, but it is an invalid contract, and always has been. Look at the bottom of that ‘contract’ to our right. What date is there? Why, it’s August 3, 2015, and guess what? the actual date this was signed was September 3, 2015.
Trump, a businessman, had to know this.
This point is never brought up.


27 posted on 09/18/2015 2:06:45 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; cotton1706
Come on people..think outside the box..really show those conservative upstarts a thing or two..

What a ticket!!!!!!

28 posted on 09/18/2015 2:06:52 PM PDT by BerniesFriend (I am BerniesFriend, however it's really Bernadette, NOT Bernie Sanders friend!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I have resisted Third Party. I understand the pitfalls. They do this. and I sever all ties to the GOP. They can join the ranks of the Whigs and the Federalists. They want loyalty and then pull this? I will burn my registration card.


29 posted on 09/18/2015 2:07:44 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

What a bunch of cowards. If GOP-e would do what they were elected to do, they wouldn’t be in this position. btw - I will not vote for Romney.


30 posted on 09/18/2015 2:07:58 PM PDT by cblue55 ("Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

That would end the Republican Party


31 posted on 09/18/2015 2:08:23 PM PDT by RaginRak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The GOP is hell bent on forcing some RINO they can control down the throats of the electorate. If they run Romney it will only confirm (again) their Washington Cartel complicity.


32 posted on 09/18/2015 2:08:59 PM PDT by Jenny217
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Dole is 92. Why not? LOL


33 posted on 09/18/2015 2:10:32 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Congress will have blood on their hands if anything happens because of the Iran appeasement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: freespirit2012

Romney would not even get 1%


Yup. Linda Graham would score higher.


34 posted on 09/18/2015 2:11:03 PM PDT by samtheman (2014: Voters elect Repubs to congress... 2015: Repubs defund NOTHING... 2016: Trump/(Cruz or Palin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
If true, this proves they are less concerned with winning than the possible upsetting of the gravy train.

It was proven DECADES AGO.

35 posted on 09/18/2015 2:11:25 PM PDT by Founding Father (The Pedophile moHAMmudd (PBUH---Pigblood be upon him))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Oh Oh, peers’ the Fox just got into the chicken house by the sounds of all panic squawking.


36 posted on 09/18/2015 2:11:26 PM PDT by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Wow, the other 15 or so candidates running now should feel really great about the confidence Gopee has for them.
37 posted on 09/18/2015 2:11:42 PM PDT by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam
Really. The GOP would rather see the Democrats in power than have Bush lose to Trump. Cut off nose; spite face.

The individual members of the GOPe will receive a nice paycheck from the cabal for throwing the game.

38 posted on 09/18/2015 2:11:43 PM PDT by Vision Thing ("Community Organizer" is a shorter way of saying "Commie Unity Organizer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

LMAO ROFL....brilliant!


39 posted on 09/18/2015 2:11:59 PM PDT by entropy12 (When you vote for a candidate, you are actually voting for his rich donors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Sarah Palin got more votes for President

They sure weren't voting for McCain

He couldn't get 100 people at a campaign event before Palin

40 posted on 09/18/2015 2:12:51 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson