Posted on 09/04/2015 11:47:40 AM PDT by detective
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton posted a message on Thursday saying that government officials should "uphold the law—end of story."
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Translation: “the fix is in and I am getting off free as a bird. The fall guy, however, we have to go all ‘law and order’ on his or her arse. No worries, the fall guy will get pardoned. Move on.”
Clinton thinks conservatives should uphold the law... traditional Americans... the ‘little people’...
Clinton also feels liberal elites are above the law - and the ONLY punishment they’re meted out is a forced ‘apology’ that’s not worth crap and the empty phrase, “I take responsibility’. A phrase that means ‘move on - I’m tired of this’...
One more reason to hate the DC elites and their double standards....
OH! THIS IS RICH LADY.
(Caption under Hillary’s photo. She IS, after all, a RICH public “servant”.)
Unless you’re Hillary.
When will we stop carrying these slugs on our backs?
“You’re guilty of a great sin, Mr. Rearden, much guiltier than they tell you, but not in the way they preach. The worst guilt is to accept an undeserved guilt-and that is what you have been doing all your life. You have been paying blackmail, not for your vices, but for your virtues. You have been willing to carry the load of an unearned punishment-and to let it grow the heavier the greater the virtues you practiced. But your virtues were those, which keep men alive. Your own moral code-the one you lived by, but never stated, acknowledged or defended-was the code that preserves man’s existence. If you were punished for it, what was the nature of those who punished you? Yours was the code of life. What, then, is theirs? What standard of value lies at its root? What is its ultimate purpose? Do you think that what you’re facing is merely a conspiracy to seize your wealth? You, who know the source of wealth, should know it’s much more and much worse than that. Did you ask me to name man’s motive power? Man’s motive power is his moral code. Ask yourself where their code is leading you and what it offers you as your final goal. A viler evil than to murder a man, is to sell him suicide as an act of virtue. A viler evil than to throw a man into a sacrificial furnace, is to demand that he leap in, of his own will, and that he build the furnace, besides. By their own statement, it is they who need you and have nothing to offer you in return. By their own statement, you must support them because they cannot survive without you. Consider the obscenity of offering their impotence and their need-their need of you-as a justification for your torture. Are you willing to accept it? Do you care to purchase-at the price of your great endurance, at the price of your agony-the satisfaction of the needs of your own destroyers?”
“No!”
“Mr. Rearden,” said Francisco, his voice solemnly calm, “if you saw Atlas, the giant who holds the world on his shoulders, if you saw that he stood, blood running down his chest, his knees buckling, his arms trembling but still trying to hold the world aloft with the last of his strength, and the greater his effort the heavier the world bore down upon his shoulders-what would you tell him to do?”
“I . . . don’t know. What . . . could he do? What would you tell him?”
“To shrug.”
As she said this she was laughing her a$$ of knowing nothing will ever happen to her.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Nor sanctuary cities and state legalized pot!
I’m stealin’ those!
Yeah, ol bigheadfred...he was a real pip! LOL...your spell checker marked sake as whine!!
Ambassador Stevens agrees that justice should be served concerning Benghazi.
Yeah, unless you’re Barack Obama.
The marriage law of Kentucky is apparently unconstitutional.
So there is no law allowing a clerk is issue a marriage license in Kentucky.
So the clerk is refusing to issue marriage licenses.
As is her duty.
If people want to get married, they can get a license in Massachusetts and marry in that state.
Hillary Clinton. Good night is she not the greatest liar on earth! Rules only apply to her opponents...
Why doesn't she cite the specific section that should be upheld?
Here is a section of the law in black and white that anybody can look up and which she should be able to cite since she was a lawyer at one point in her life...
U.S.C. Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 93 - PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
Here is the section...
Sec. 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
What "law", Your Thighess?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.