This is a bumper sticker on both of my cars ...
Posted on 08/06/2015 2:32:30 PM PDT by Voice of Reason1
In our final installment we look directly at who the national Socialist leftists truly are and why they have to lie.
3. Socialist aren’t Socialists, Leftists aren’t Socialists, The Nazis weren’t a Socialist worker’s party, Failed Socialist regimes were really ‘right wing’… And lastly: Non socialists ARE Socialist
I know, 20 lb. of BS{Bernie Sanders} in a 5 lb. Bag .. but that’s what you get when you study the prevarication’s and bold faced Lies of the national Socialist Left.
This has many variations and facets with some dating back in to the last century.
First of all let’s demolish the Left isn’t Socialist LIE with a posting of the definition of the word Left:
Definition of left 2 Relating to a person or group favouring radical, reforming, or socialist views: Left politics left periodicals such as Marxism Today 2 (often the Left) [treated as singular or plural] A group or party favouring radical, reforming, or socialist views Origin Old English lyft, left 'weak' (the left-hand side being regarded as the weaker side of the body), of West Germanic origin. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/english/left via @OxfordWordsThen you simply have to look at the definition of socialism.
Note that being a socialist means you merely advocate this concept – as is Obama when he advocated the government taking over Healthcare as single payer. There are many other examples of where he has done this, so aside from denying the facts and reality it should be clear the man is a socialist along with the rest of his national party.
But the final nail should be the ‘difference question’ – naming the differences between the Democratic National Socialist Party and other socialists.
Then there is the every popular National Socialist German Workers’ Party not being a National Socialist German Workers’ Party…. Leftist can never explain this away aside from their lame OPINION (i.e. not supported by facts) that this was just propaganda or some other nonsense.
And don’t bother with the International vs. national alleged difference – like most Talking points this is usually one line deep without real historic facts behind it. Besides which, in the long run this is just a case of a distinction without and difference. It’s like arguing over the pronunciation of the name of a poison – it’s dangerous and will kill you just as much no matter how you quibble over ancillary words.
And of course this lead us into the failed socialist regime allegedly being ‘rightwing’ this falls in line with most Lies from the national Socialist Left – it based on nothing and only is supported by repetition until it supposition is the ‘truth’. The latest example is the supposition that North Korea is rightwing’ somehow:
Finally [Yes, this is just on Lie number 3] there is the newer lie that non-socialist countries are socialist - this is to somehow claim that it ‘works’ some how. The definition of the word and their economic success should put this lie to bed.
In many ways Socialism is like poison – the dose is what kills a society and it makes no sense to take in this evil.
2. Socialism can actually work – a century of failure proves nothing.
This should be an easy one to demolish but the lies from the national Socialist Left mentioned in #3 make it hard to quash. There is also the issue that the national Socialist Left loves to makes excuses and blame other for the abject failure of it’s base ideology.
One only has to look at the destruction and death from socialism around the world to see how it’s failed every time it’s been tried. The old USSR and the rest of the Warsaw pact, North Korea, Cuba, Greece, Venezuela, etc all are examples of it’s failure every time.
It fails because it defies human nature – people will respond to stimuli in certain set ways. Reward will spur one on to work harder, punishment will discourage this activity. It’s that simple, take property in the form of earnings from one for the purpose of buying votes from others and you have a disincentive for work. Hand out freebies in the form of other people’s money and you have the same effect. It’s a double whammy that leads to Socialism collapse as happened all over the world.
Yes, you will have national Socialist Leftist piping up about Sweden, etc. But we’re talking about a race homogenous society in a relatively small nation that has our protection so they can waste their money on Marxist systems. This is a rare case that hardly argues for the ‘success’ of Socialism in the face of Socialism Failure everywhere else.
Socialism cannot work and it never will – it is evil personified with a leftist handing out other people’s money for a vote to get them into power. Then all the utopian promises vanish and the state needs a terror apparatus like the KGB, Stasi or Gestapo to keep the people in line.
1. The Left is ‘Liberal’ and/or ‘Progressive’
Just take a look at the definition of liberal:
1 willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one’s own; open to new ideas. favourable to or respectful of individual rights and freedoms
(in a political context) favouring individual liberty, free trade
Origin: Middle English: via Old French from Latin liberalis, from liber ‘free (man)’. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/liberal?
Does that even sound like the people of the national Socialist Left these days?
Take a look at the definition of progressive
2(of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas a
Origin: early 17th century: from French progressif, -ive or medieval Latin progressivus, from progress- ‘gone forward’, from the verb progredi (see progress)
www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/progressive?
Note that the definitions get vaguer and vaguer over time – I supposed the national Socialist Left will invent a new term for themselves that even more vague – ‘Sociey’ or something that sounds cool and means absolutely nothing.
As with most of the national Socialist Left’s ‘activities’ even their very name is a LIE, but they have convinced themselves of their righteousness and thus they have carte blanche in doing what ever they want.
Look at their current activities attempting to suppress speech and send us back to the beginning of the last century under failed ideology of socialism – that’s their idea of ‘progress’.
Left wing, right wing, it’s all European socialism to me.
As soon as I read “In our final installment we look directly at who the national Socialist leftists truly are and why they have to lie.”
I caught something, you said “national Socialist”, which translates to NAZI.
“”willing to respect or accept behaviour or opinions different from one’s own””
Sounds like conservatism
Exactly - and the opposite of what the national socialist left does.
They were Socialists - it was contained in their name.
But the left like to use ‘Nazi’ to hide that fact.
This is a bumper sticker on both of my cars ...
I like the bumper sticker.
So few lefties are even aware of this, it’s like they are brain dead. Oh, what a minute. They are, aren’t they.
I like the, “Bernie Sanders = BS” idea from the article.
Did you make the bumper sticker of buy it?
The reason we are called ‘Right’ is because we are.
Made it and bought it ... Cafepress.
Oh I like that!
Private property vs. collective property is the difference between right and left.
Where did you get that?
Cafepress.com; I designed it and bought it from there. I don't know whether anyone else can purchase individually-designed stuff there or not.
I’d like to see more items like that - getting the point across about the true nature of the national socialist Left.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.