Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News Republican Candidates 5 P.M. Debate LIVE THREAD [bottom tier]
Fox News ^ | 8-5-2015 | TCRLAF

Posted on 08/06/2015 1:27:07 PM PDT by tcrlaf

Live stream at the above link, as well as on LiveStream

http://www.livenewschat.eu/the-republican-debates-live-stream/

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016debates; debate; firstgopdebate; fox; gopdebate; happyhourdebate; livegopdebate; liveundertendebate; republican; undercardgopdebate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,101 next last
To: Catsrus

Fiorina ran for the senate a few years ago as pro-abortion.


901 posted on 08/06/2015 4:28:24 PM PDT by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

True that...


902 posted on 08/06/2015 4:28:24 PM PDT by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 892 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Graham: A 60 year old bachelor with no children who wants to give up his SS to make the system solvent. Graham, Pataki, Gilmore, and Perry should get the hook. There is no way they should be considered serious candidates.

Isn't that nice that Linda is willing to give up part of his SSI....considering he is exempt from ObamaCare, will get a huge pension for being a crooked, backstabbing weasel in congress for decades and gets a Military pension for putting in a day's service per year for a look long time. You bet, a foggy bottom serpent telling us what needs to be done.....the same thing he refused to do for over 20 years! FULG

903 posted on 08/06/2015 4:28:27 PM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The original 1998 version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I’m not sure Jindal is as tough on amnesty as we all thought he was.


904 posted on 08/06/2015 4:28:51 PM PDT by Andy'smom (How many more acts of love can we take?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
The hatred for Santorum is pretty pronounced here. Sometimes I am surprised over it.

It's not "hatred". It's weariness. Most of us think Rick Santorum was ill suited to run for the presidency the last time around - even more-so this time.

The guy has never been ready for prime time, and never will be.

905 posted on 08/06/2015 4:29:16 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: caww

I hope Cruz totally rocks it tonight.


906 posted on 08/06/2015 4:29:22 PM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 886 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen

ROTFLMAO, I love Bloom County!

Everyone thought Brethed might have some fun with Trump.


907 posted on 08/06/2015 4:30:05 PM PDT by rikkir (You can lead a horde to knowledge but you can't make them think. (TnkU ctdonath2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: Sun

“.... nobody is better than Rick Santorum on foreign policy”......

actually not...and 5 other candidates surpass him...here’s why:

Santorum voted for the START II Treaty in 1996, a treaty that severely weakened U.S. national security. (Senate.gov)

Santorum voted to give North Korea $25 million in aid in 1996. (Senate.gov)

Santorum voted for the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) in 1997. (Senate.gov)

Santorum Voted in favor of an amendment providing for an $18 billion bailout of the International Monetary Fund in 1998. (Senate.gov)

Santorum voted against offsetting an increase to defense spending with equal budget cuts in non-defense areas in 2001. (Senate.gov)

Santorum has criticized Republicans that want to halt foreign aid to countries that are hostile to the U.S., namely Pakistan. (The Hill)

Santorum originally supported U.S. involvement in Syria, (CNN) but shifted his position to coincide with the wave of public opinion opposing action in Syria. (ABC News)


908 posted on 08/06/2015 4:30:39 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 884 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

This song is more appropriate for the second dish....

PINK - GET THE PARTY STARTED
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1dbiD_zDk


909 posted on 08/06/2015 4:30:48 PM PDT by Patriot Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

They won’t ask him. They are his friends.


910 posted on 08/06/2015 4:32:47 PM PDT by xzins (Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Thanks for that info. re: Pataki.

I love New York and vacationed there for about 15 years——upstate and Sag Harbor.

My son lived in Nassau County for 21 years.

We all love the city.

The only thing we don’t like is The Yankees.:-)

.


911 posted on 08/06/2015 4:33:10 PM PDT by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

No, actually Santorum isn’t for amnesty—as Trump is, as long as they go home to visit with their families first.


912 posted on 08/06/2015 4:33:21 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 896 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

More important to me would be giving Santorum a platform—to make it clear that the rest of the options are for amnesty.


913 posted on 08/06/2015 4:34:48 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 899 | View Replies]

To: Andy'smom

Here ya go....

During an appearance on CBS’ Face the Nation on February 23, 2014, Jindal said:

“I’ve said all along that people that wanna come into this country, work hard, get an education, that’s good for them, that’s good for us; there’s nothing wrong with Republicans in Congress saying, ‘Let’s secure the border first.’ If this president was serious about moving forward a comprehensive approach, he would start by securing the border. We don’t need a 1,000-page bill, it’s not complicated. Right now, we’ve got low walls and a narrow gate. That’s the opposite of what we need.” (CBS News)

Jindal criticized congressional Republicans for failing to achieve their campaign promise of defunding the Department of Homeland Security and defeating President Obama’s unilateral actions on immigration. (Politico)

Jindal is a believer in immigrant assimilation, and strongly opposes the use of hyphenates to describe people as anything other than American. “We don’t discriminate against anybody who wants to come and live in our country and follow our laws and adopt our values. What does that mean? That means we should be unafraid to teach English in our schools. That means we should be unafraid to insist that when people come here they’re not here to set up their own cultures [to] overtake ours, they’re here to become a part of America.” (National Review)

Jindal voted in favor of a 2005 amendment punishing state and local governments that don’t share information with federal immigration authorities by withholding funding. (Clerk.House.gov)
Jindal voted in favor of a 2005 amendment punishing sanctuary cities that are uncooperative with federal immigration agents by withholding funding. (Clerk.House.gov)

Jindal voted in favor of a 2005 amendment bolstering the relationship between state and local law enforcement in working to crack down on illegal immigration. (Clerk.House.gov)

Jindal voted in favor of a 2005 amendment mandating comprehensive interior enforcement to help remove illegal immigrants. (Clerk.House.gov)

Jindal voted in favor of building a fence along the Mexican border in 2006. (Clerk.House.gov)

Jindal has called for curtailing immigration for radical Islamists. (Daily Caller)

Jindal supports significantly increasing skilled and unskilled immigration levels, but doesn’t mention tying these increases to welfare reforms. (National Review)


914 posted on 08/06/2015 4:35:36 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 904 | View Replies]

To: SMM48

Carly should have said, “who?” when asked about Trump.


915 posted on 08/06/2015 4:37:19 PM PDT by Baldwin77 (Christians want their RAINBOW back. I'm offended the gays use a Biblical icon as their flag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Whew, I finally caught up, oh crap... never mind.


916 posted on 08/06/2015 4:38:09 PM PDT by RetSignman (Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet

Ha—another case of Carly accusing Trump of what she’s guilty of herself!


917 posted on 08/06/2015 4:38:15 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 901 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
It's not "hatred". It's weariness. Most of us think Rick Santorum was ill suited to run for the presidency the last time around - even more-so this time. The guy has never been ready for prime time, and never will be.

Well said. I remember when Santorum ran four years ago, there was an article about how he went home to do his taxes on home computer. I remember at that time being dumbstruck that 1) he would actually do that as a presidential candidate and 2) that he would make that public.

Maybe Santorum thought that would score him points with the "common man" but it simply illustrated just how out of his league he was with regard to running for the presidency. Nothing against average Joe's who do their own taxes on computer. But you don't expect those individuals to be running for chief executive of the United States either.

918 posted on 08/06/2015 4:38:16 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 905 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

He will along with Trump =)


919 posted on 08/06/2015 4:38:20 PM PDT by Patriot Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 906 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Santorum voted to allow illegal aliens to receive tax credits under the Earned Income Credit (EIC) in 2006. (Senate.gov)

Santorum voted against hiring an additional 1,000 border patrol agents in 2005. (Senate.gov)


920 posted on 08/06/2015 4:38:34 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 912 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 881-900901-920921-940 ... 1,101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson