Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mike Lee goes for nuclear option to repeal Obamacare
Washington Post ^ | July 24, 2015 | By Kelsey Snell

Posted on 07/24/2015 3:37:46 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

Senate conservatives couldn’t stop a vote on the Export-Import bank. So they’re going to try to force a vote on Obamacare instead.

Conservative firebrand Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) announced on Friday that he plans to use a complicated procedural maneuver known as the nuclear option to repeal the Affordable Care Act with just 51 votes.

Democrats famously used the strategy in 2013 to break a Republican blockade of President Obama’s nominees to fill judicial openings. Now Lee wants to use the partisan procedure get rid of Obamacare.

It’s unclear whether Lee’s gambit will work — but if it does, there are likely 51 senators who would vote to repeal Obama’s signature domestic achievement. The issue is whether such language can get a vote on the Senate floor to begin with.

Here’s where things get complicated.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; 114th; abolishobamacare; aca; mikelee; nuclearoption; obamacare; rinocare; scotuscare; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: NRx

2012 - Come on guys. We can’t kill it. Not now. Let’s wait until we control the Senate. Then we can really do what we want. The important thing is that you keep voting Republican.

2015 - Come on guys. We can’t kill it. Not now. Let’s wait until we control the White House. Then we can really do what we want. The important thing is that you keep voting Republican.

2017 - Come on guys. We can’t kill it. Not now. We have just won a big election and built up too much good will with the American people. We don’t want to loose it. Let’s get some other stuff done first then we will get to that. The important thing is that you keep voting Republican.

2019 - Come on guys. Now that we don’t control Congress anymore you need to vote for more Republicans so we can finally kill it.


21 posted on 07/24/2015 4:37:25 PM PDT by nitzy (I don't vote for Republican'ts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative
A successful vote to repeal before January 2017 will be vetoed and would be simply a symbolic gesture.

B.S.

Their constituents sent them there to fight. If leadership gets in the way or Obama gets in the way, it is not a wasted effort as it puts everyone on record and makes it easier to get rid of the useless traitors in our midst come Primary time.
22 posted on 07/24/2015 4:56:27 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NRx
This is political theater, nothing more, nothing less. We need to concentrate on winning back the White house in ‘16. As long as the Dummies hold it we can stage all the votes we want. All we are doing is wasting paper and ink.

Another GOP-E mole heard from.
23 posted on 07/24/2015 4:57:10 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NRx

That depends on who sits in the chair at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue as President. We gave the House and Senate their majorities - so what difference did it make?


24 posted on 07/24/2015 5:02:59 PM PDT by Catsrus (WWWW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

You make a very good point FRiend


25 posted on 07/24/2015 5:06:54 PM PDT by onona (If I agree with something Donald says in a forest, and no one hears, am I still a "Trumper" ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

———Lee gets to tell his supporters that he’s responsible——

and then announce he’s running for president


26 posted on 07/24/2015 5:07:49 PM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative
A successful vote to repeal before January 2017 will be vetoed and would be simply a symbolic gesture.

Agreed. I want that terrible law repealed, but I want it gone forever, not just a teasing game of make-believe followed by a veto.

27 posted on 07/24/2015 5:50:13 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trisham

Apples and Oranges. Drop me a line when your heading to the WH with your tactical rifle.


28 posted on 07/24/2015 5:54:20 PM PDT by NRx (An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

Not sure if you have heard of it, but there is something called a VETO. All presidents have it. And until we remove the communists from the WH, any legislation to repeal SCOTUS-care is just pissing into a headwind and advertising our political impotence.


29 posted on 07/24/2015 5:56:38 PM PDT by NRx (An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative

“A successful vote to repeal before January 2017 will be vetoed and would be simply a symbolic gesture.”

A real opposition party would relish the opportunity to force their opponents to take a vote on an issue highly unpopular with the people. A real opposition party would then use that vote as a hammer in the next election.

A fake opposition party declines to put its opponents on the spot.

Symbolic gestures can sometimes be extremely powerful and set the stage for real action.


30 posted on 07/24/2015 5:56:57 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

The difference is who wields the Veto.


31 posted on 07/24/2015 5:57:21 PM PDT by NRx (An unrepentant champion of the old order and determined foe of damnable Whiggery in all its forms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

Missing? The States, whom could quash 99% of what’s coming out of D.C. using the 9th and 10th (and holding any/all $$ in escrow).

Course, I’m talking when we HAD a Republic...


32 posted on 07/24/2015 7:10:10 PM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

Mike Lee= good
Orrin Hatch = used to be good, has succumbed to Washington lobbyist temptations. Another poster boy for term limits.


33 posted on 07/24/2015 7:34:40 PM PDT by Calpublican (Boehner and McConnell are corrupt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bert

Mike Lee is honorable. He and Cruz have been fighting McConnell for several years.


34 posted on 07/24/2015 7:37:09 PM PDT by Calpublican (Boehner and McConnell are corrupt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: grania

That’s the durn truth.

The GOPe wants Obamacare, because the US COC want Obamacare.

If a vote along party lines with defectors could well override a veto if this were proposed, and even if it didn’t, the issue would be a club to beat the dems and GOPe with.

The only question worth asking is if Mike Lee is GOPe or not.


35 posted on 07/24/2015 7:45:17 PM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Cruz calling McConnell out as the back-stabbing liar he is should help some make up their minds about who they want to be related to in the Public Eye. Some say Cruz hasn’t the experience and I say he has something more important - brains and determination.


36 posted on 07/25/2015 3:21:03 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpublican

yep


37 posted on 07/25/2015 4:27:20 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative
A successful vote to repeal before January 2017 will be vetoed and would be simply a symbolic gesture.

On the other hand, the vote will not only force Democrats to take a position, it will force Republicans to stand up and be counted --- and that may be the primary benefit.

38 posted on 07/26/2015 8:52:35 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Two months ago the Republicans were talking about plans to keep Obamacare going for a while if the Supreme Court struck it down. Now we’re supposed to believe that the Republicans are willing to repeal it and end it immediately?


39 posted on 07/26/2015 8:58:11 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

The dems have pretty much taken their position. Don’t expect them to rally for the truth ever! But, yes, this will be telling for the repub’icans. Huston never showed at the Alamo and some very brave patriots were lost. I’m guessing the senator from Kentucky will put off calling for reinforcements as well.


40 posted on 07/26/2015 6:30:30 PM PDT by downtownconservative (Mohamed was a tranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson