Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/10/2015 9:43:01 AM PDT by JohnKinAK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnKinAK

Well, his family criticized him for being against it.


2 posted on 07/10/2015 9:44:56 AM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnKinAK; onyx; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; ...

Scott Walker favors traditional marriage, despite what this article claims. However, he also favors following the law. Make of it what you will.

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.


3 posted on 07/10/2015 9:47:57 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnKinAK

Walker, like others has his own set of problems.


4 posted on 07/10/2015 9:48:34 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnKinAK

This is just the beginning of the BS that will be coming at Walker.....of course these idiots have been trying to destroy him for over 5 years. Good luck losers. Anyone who is against Walker is a complete idiot.


5 posted on 07/10/2015 9:49:15 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnKinAK

People are not legally barred from marrying others of the same sex, or horses or doorposts or comic book characters, or Grandma, for that matter. What’s at issue is whether those relationships should be sanctified by the State, and whether other individuals should be forced by the State to recognize them as “marriages” and participate in their rituals, contrary to their own faith.


6 posted on 07/10/2015 10:00:14 AM PDT by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnKinAK

It doesn’t matter.

There are no where near the votes for any Constitutional amendment.

The best we can do is play defense on religious freedom.


8 posted on 07/10/2015 10:15:28 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (DC, it's Versailles on the Potomac but without the food and culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnKinAK

1. Why is he at a homosexual wedding of ANY kind?

2. Why does he have homosexual “friends”?

He is creeping into the jbush territory.


11 posted on 07/10/2015 10:34:44 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnKinAK
What a stupid article.

So, if a person feels being "unfaithful's" a bad idea... then they can't attend a re-marriage" ?

Stupid, stupid, stupid.

This is more of that liberal crap that says 'IF you're not totally perfect you can't disagree with anything immoral...

The standard liberal lowlifes have for themselves is 'anything goes'.

The standard liberal lowlifes hold us to is total perfection.

Face it, liberals are little manipulative sh*ts.

15 posted on 07/10/2015 11:03:07 AM PDT by GOPJ (How about 'Sanctuary Cities' for bank robbers and tax cheats? All Criminals are equal, right?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnKinAK
Here's my philosophy.

Civil unions- fine. Don't expect God to bless their relationship.

Marriages- NO. There are too many laws that use the term “marriage” to qualify situations where children are concerned. Two child molesters could marry with the intent to adopt children to molest. Possibly this happens in one man-one woman marriages as well, but probably not to the extent possible with gay marriage.

17 posted on 07/10/2015 2:48:00 PM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson