Posted on 06/28/2015 12:18:09 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Actually, isn’t it more like they are preparing to, ummm, “attach” the boys to the men and the girls to the women and not in very wholesome ways?
They can read, but they decide what the words mean.
Liberals = Humpty Dumpty
But this can’t be. I thought after this ruling, homos will get “married” and leave everyone else alone?
Just said it would be fine with me.
How God chooses to deal with sin is His business.
Personally I would prefer to be raptured first.
Yes I have seen and done kinda what i have wanted in life I am not a fan of checking out but i have love for and from God in my heart and soul so its ok but if CW II of what ever number it is I will hopefully down my share of boneheads as allways Prayers up
I hear ya.
If I’m not there on time...go ahead and get started without me. I’m probably stuck in traffic...
These lesbo homos are just plain sick in the head. They are abnormal and will never be normal in any sense of the word.
The Daily Mail today showed photos of flag rallies in Florida, Mississippi and other states. They claimed one turned out a thousand people. Not civil disobedience but that may be up next.
As of right now, that is the case. But all it will take is one court case of some Marxist judge siding with the fag couple that a church does not have the right to turn away a couple from matching there while re-writing the First amendment Freedom of Religion clause.
I can see this happening out west. A Marxist federal circuit court judge rules that a traditional Bible Believing church violated the fags right to marry and that the church's First Amendment Freedom of Religion rights is not applicable.
Next the Marxist dominated court 9th circuit court of appeals upholds the lower courts rulings that a church that refuses to marry a fag couple can face both civil and criminal sanctions if they refuse and that the Church's First Amendment rights do not apply.
Then the Supreme Court rules 5-4 that even established, traditional Bible Believing churches can receive civil and criminal sanctions from the state if they refuse to marry fag couples.
Kennedy would likely be the swing vote and write the opinion that even traditional churches cannot refuse to marry fags without sanctions and they have no First Amendnent rights in this matter, in spite of his written opinion in the fag marriage case that said traditional churches cannot be legally forced to marry fags.
cw3 actully
If they say that, then we just need to move ON them! You don’t suppose they they are at least some of those who voted for Romney, do you?
Does this mean that Mosques “MUST” marry Perverts/GAYS aka QUEERS or any variant of them?
Not even then ...
sodom /sodomy - came from the Bible. after God’s destruction of two villages Sodom and Gomorrah for perverse unnatural acts. Tammy Baldwin is an idiot!
Next, if a heterosexual rejects a homosexuals advances one will be deemed ahater...shades of sodom & gomerrha.
Bring out your sons so that we may know them...
The Confederate battle flag bears the Cross of St. Andrew.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.