Posted on 06/26/2015 7:00:35 AM PDT by C19fan
Holding: Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex.
5-4 decision
After O’Hare’s complaints NASA did try and stop astronauts from quoting the Bible and stuff a lot of the time.Not totally successful but somewhat.
After O’Hare’s complaints NASA did try and stop astronauts from quoting the Bible and stuff a lot of the time.Not totally successful but somewhat.
It was also a shame that dear Madelyn didn't defect to USSR rather than that faith in America, needed stomping out and erased from the minds of American children, though that was always the Communist goal, she happily lead the charge.
Sure. Though they didn’t totally wipe it out, they did their level best to make it as insignificant as possible.
Right now, somebody try to marry his/her mother, and let’s see what reason the government would give, to refuse to recognize that “marriage” - given that people have a Constitutional “right” to government recognition of whatever “marriage” a person wants to call a “marriage”.
And then double the stakes, and have somebody try to marry their mother AND father, because if people have a right to government recognition of whatever cohabitation situations people call “marriage”, then threesomes have to be OK too.
Right?
I pity all those who are pastors in these times. Yes, the persecution is coming.
I think 4th of July would be a really good time to fly the flag upside-down - an international distress signal.
I don’t have a country. Can a person renounce citizenship while still living here?
The country I have pledged allegiance to was a REPUBLIC - a Constitutional Republic, where the Constitution ruled, not men. It no longer exists. It actually hasn’t existed since about September 2008.
I feel your pain.
And freedom of religion is a Constitutional right - not something any state can hinder. There's still going to be hell to pay in this battle but if it got to Supreme Court, I believe the court would side with the churches.
The number of TRULY disenfranchised voters just went up exponentially.
I hope she does, so it will be a different court when somebody marries their mother and some state balks at giving a marriage license...
Now marriage is a right and just shacking up together is a personal decision.
I have some thoughts on this but since this could go too far where it would force things like bakers to bake cakes against their will and principles, now we could have slavery back via SCOTUS. My father calls that slavery too. How about this? If they bring the draft back can they force religious objectors like Quakers and Amish serve in combat roles? This is bad law, the descision on who can marry who should be left to the States and/or the people themselves to decide via their own convictions or through the legislative processes of their respective States.
Hah! He also wrote this:
"Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself."
RE “...When you legalize the Death of Children anything is possible. ...”
Which was their goal all along.
If the most innocent lives aren’t sacred, NO lives are.
Today five “justices” (sic) of the Supreme Court, contrary to nature, reason, and moral law, and in violation of the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution they are sworn to uphold, trampled on the rights of states to have laws against homosexual “marriage” (sick). May their names live in infamy: Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy, and Sonia Sotomayor.
Of course, I and millions of other Americans will never recognize the legitimacy of their evil and unconstitutional ruling. And as an ordained minister, I will never conduct a homosexual wedding, regardless of the consequences. “We must obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29).
What I will do is to work to defeat any political candidate who approves of this constitutional and moral abomination. And I will support a presidential candidate who will appoint true justices, in hopes that they will overturn this monstrous decision—along with a similar unconstitutional ruling, i.e., Roe v. Wade (1973), which likewise trampled on the rights of states to have laws against abortion.
Go ahead and be complicit in left wing agendas. You are no conservative.
And a troll to boot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.