Posted on 06/19/2015 5:00:18 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Edited on 06/19/2015 5:08:16 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
In fairness to them, some of the reason for the upset is righteous. “Alexander Hamilton is not someone that people have a problem with,” said the director of the Women On 20s campaign. Why kick the great man off the currency instead of the far more dubious Andrew Jackson? I couldn’t agree more.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
Hell, put her on the $10,000.00 bill. Few people know who Salmon P. Chase was anyway. And when interest rates start rising soon pretty soon anyone who wants to buy a loaf of bread will need a $10,000.00.
“Dubious Andrew Jackson?” Andrew Jackson was the last President to pay off the national debt and he opposed the formation of the Federal Reserve.
As long as its Aunt Esther I’m good with it. :-)
Hence why the Mint is willing to go along with this idea; international recognition of the $10 bill is likely minimal; $1, $5, $20 and $100 are internationally recognized.
More suited to a $3 bill.
They need to put 0bama on the $3 bill.
Some taxpayers are unhappy their money is being frittered away on such uselessness.
How about Janet Napolitano ... kill two birds with one option ... semi-female and a dog!
alley oop!
I’d be OK with it if it was somebody like
Abigail Adams or Dolly Madison. (no cake jokes either)
Those two or Betsy Ross. Someone who wasn’t a one-trick pony.
Is there a woman in US history who contributed to the country and its well being and is known for the content of her work, not that she was FIRST. Someone who DID something.
Why do we need a woman on our money?
Alexander Hamilton is far more worthy of being on a bill than Andrew Jackson. Hamilton wrote the F-ing Federalist Papers!!!!
Jackson opposed central banking and slaughtered indigenous people.
Jackson got an extraordinary amount of fight out of his Indian allies at Horseshoe Bend. He never slaughtered Indians. Racial Indians did not even have to make the march to Oklahoma if they did not desire to live under tribal governance.
If it has to be done, then let it be Julia Child, or Martha Stewart.
I’d be ok with Abigail Adams, which would make the point that married couples used to act as a single unit.
Abigail was a brilliant woman and a real Founding Mother.
I’m certain that she is not on th e list.
He was always a populist, extra-Constitutional, and was responsible for the Trail of Tears.
is there a subliminal msg with the libtard idea to replace a MULATTO with a VAGINA on the sawbuck..???
(obama .....hillary)...???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
