Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former House Speaker Hastert Indicted In Probe Into $3.5M In Withdrawals
NPR ^

Posted on 05/28/2015 4:40:52 PM PDT by navysealdad

Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert was indicted Thursday by a federal grand jury in Chicago. The Illinois Republican, 73, is charged with trying to evade cash withdrawal requirements, and with lying to the FBI about it.

(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 201207; bank; blackmail; blackmailed; chicago; combine; dennishastert; extortion; hastert; hastertindicted; illinois; indicted; structuring; thecombine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last
To: semaj

My bad, GOPe.


21 posted on 05/28/2015 4:59:40 PM PDT by semaj (.People get ready, Jesus is coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
I know the answer, 12

The vote to indict was unanimous: 27 to 0

22 posted on 05/28/2015 5:01:50 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (If Hillary was running against Satan, I'd probably abstain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Well said, and true. Thank you.


23 posted on 05/28/2015 5:02:02 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

Interesting how this major indictment comes down on a Republican who’s been out of politics and out of the public eye for nearly a decade, all for withdrawing his money. Maybe it was bribes, but if so, why not charge him with that?

Meanwhile, Obama has a certain go-to riot-making jive-ass who owes the IRS over $4.5 million, and is a frequent guest in the White House. No justice investigation there. There is a major IRS abuse of Tea Party citizens, no justice indictments there. IRS hacking scandal, no justice investigation there. Major meltdowns of American cities with wild-assed out of control prosecutor in Baltimore, no investigation there.

Too busy doing double-jeopardy on a Cleveland cop who’s been acquitted or Darren Wilson in Ferguson after the local Grand Jury refused to indict. Too busy chasing a bunch of foreign FIFA soccer guys that 99.9% of the American people couldn’t give a crap about. We are melting, folks.


24 posted on 05/28/2015 5:02:17 PM PDT by untwist (One Bad-Assed Mistake, America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

This is probably hitting the news cycle now to keep something Hillary and Bill did out of the headlines. Timing is everything.

It is creepy how the government is so concerned about people keeping cash. I understand about detecting illegal transactions and/or tax avoidance. But sometimes people just like to keep cash. My grandfather used to. It was just the way he was. But that was a long time ago.


25 posted on 05/28/2015 5:03:39 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

It’s a lose lose. If you do $10k its legal but you get reported. If you do less than $10k it’s illegal and you get reported.


26 posted on 05/28/2015 5:03:59 PM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad
The indictment charges that Hastert began withdrawing money from various bank accounts, and that beginning in approximately July 2012 he started structuring those withdrawals in increments of less than $10,000 to evade currency transaction requirements that withdrawals of $10,000 or more be reported.

These anti-structuring laws/regulations are just wrong. Sounds like he was being blackmailed.

27 posted on 05/28/2015 5:07:09 PM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deweyfrank

How on earth do you consider withdrawing your own money in amounts LESS than the maximum permitted by law to be a criminal activity? Never mind the unconstitutionality of the $10,000 limit to begin with.

If the law says the limit is $10,000, then by definition, anything less is perfectly legal.


28 posted on 05/28/2015 5:07:45 PM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege

I hope you’re right. But I am becoming increasingly disillusioned by politicians on both sides. Things need to change, and they need to change fast.


29 posted on 05/28/2015 5:18:54 PM PDT by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege
If the law says the limit is $10,000, then by definition, anything less is perfectly legal.

Plus it proves they are monitoring ALL transactions, not just those as deemed "legal"

30 posted on 05/28/2015 5:19:05 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Ron; BwanaNdege

Ooops, INCLUDING those they deem as “legal”


31 posted on 05/28/2015 5:21:13 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

I was thinking the exact same thing. What is it to them what he spends his money pon? To a person pf means $10,000 in cash isn’t allot of money.

As for lying to the FBI, why the hell would anyone ever talk to the FBI? If the FBI says they have questions for you, TALK TO MY ATTORNEY!


32 posted on 05/28/2015 5:21:43 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

“This is all about the law the government created that controls how much of your own money you can take out of the bank at any one time. The only “crime” here is that you want your money in cash and don’t want to leave it in the bank where the government can confiscate it.”

no, in the USA you can take out as much cash as you want. there is, however, a reporting requirement that the bank report all cash transactions over $10K to FINCEN.

what Hastert was doing was to take out large amounts of cash at just under 10K per time to avoid the reporting requirement.

when people do that it is called “structuring” which is itself a felony.

Elliot Spitzer was caught up by the same law.

$3.5 million in payments indicates blackmail over something pretty nasty.

if DC is ever going to be cleaned up, dirty politicians have to be ruthlessly exposed, and all of the compromised have to be chucked.


33 posted on 05/28/2015 5:21:46 PM PDT by Reverend Wright (UK election 2015: How sweet it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

“beginning in approximately July 2012 he started structuring those withdrawals in increments of less than $10,000 to evade currency transaction requirements that withdrawals of $10,000 or more be reported.”

I think he “avoided” rather than “evaded”, the law requires banks to report daily withdrawals over $10,000, he simply withdrew below that amount.


34 posted on 05/28/2015 5:21:51 PM PDT by Sparky1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

compelling interest? You’d have to ask the same question to Hastert? If he needed , say 50 grand, in cash why wouldn’t he cash a check and get it? He was there when the law that trapped him got passed so he sure the bleep ought to know about it. I came to believe he was crooked since his biggest chunk of cash came from a real estate deal that he set up while he was in office then cashed out of after he retired.

And remember he’s one of the big spenders, always claiming he “negotiated” each bill to passage. That means he was loading them up with something for everybody until they could pass. I’d be happy to tidy up a cell for him. The one Duke Cunningham is using will be available soon.


35 posted on 05/28/2015 5:23:50 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
I read the indictment, and, regardless of the merits of requiring reporting of $10,000 in cash, it looks bad for Hastert. He was taking out a few million dollars in cash to pay someone who was extorting him for something he did previously. The government doesn't say what Hastert was trying to cover up. But whatever it was was bad enough that Hastert was willing to pay $3 million. Also, how does a congressman get enough money that he can pay a $3 million hush money deal? How much did he make, from being a wrestling coach to being speaker?

Boehner, we are coming for you.

36 posted on 05/28/2015 5:24:04 PM PDT by Defiant (Amtrak train derails, therefore......Republicans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad

The 3.5 mil $ was a payoff for a pre-first House, election”act”. He was a high school football and wrestling coach. Joe Paterno - type deal?


37 posted on 05/28/2015 5:24:08 PM PDT by Crystal Palace East (90% of MSM is lies, except the National Enquirer, of course :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

Hastert set up a shell company to buy farmland that he knew would become a new interstate interchange. His name wasn’t on the company but his wife was.. He made millions flipping some cheap land with his insider knowledge. 60 minutes or maybe dateline had done an expose on him way back. Crooked as a paper clip...


38 posted on 05/28/2015 5:26:08 PM PDT by doosee (Captain, we are approaching a new level of Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

How many? When it comes to locking up crooked SOB’s I’ll take ‘em as they come. Dims would want to be polite now because their turn is coming.


39 posted on 05/28/2015 5:26:35 PM PDT by cherokee1 (skip the names---just kick the buttz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: semaj

REALLY?

Former Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert was indicted Thursday by a federal grand jury in Chicago. The Illinois Republican, 73, is charged with trying to evade cash withdrawal requirements, and with lying to the FBI about it.


40 posted on 05/28/2015 5:30:02 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson