Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Answer to GOP's Overcrowded Debate Field
Real Clear Politics ^ | 05/18/2015 | Bill Scher

Posted on 05/18/2015 10:57:59 AM PDT by GIdget2004

Three months before the first official Republican presidential debate—and with as many as 19 potential GOP candidates—party leaders are struggling to figure out how many can plausibly fit on one stage.

Last week Politico reported a “behind-the-scenes” consensus at the Republican National Committee spring meeting that the first few debates should be capped at 12 candidates. But the confab concluded without any final decisions as to how the culling should occur.

Quantitative measures proposed so far include the candidates’ standing in state and national polls, the number of campaign events and campaign staff members, elective office experience, and fundraising. And while the party would never cop to engaging in affirmative action, some suspect that the formula will be tweaked in ways that ensure gender and racial diversity on the debate stage.

Yet somebody will have to be excluded, and the RNC is already sweating the likely backlash. Last year the RNC triumphantly seized control of the debates to make sure "grassroots conservatives have a greater voice in the presidential primary debate process," unlike in 2012 when “the liberal media interrogated our candidates on issues that were often not a priority to most Americans.” Reports now indicate the party is looking to pawn off final approval of the eligibility criteria onto the partnering media organizations in hopes of deflecting any blame.

The RNC should worry. Any sort of complicated, opaque, bureaucratic formula would not only arouse suspicion, but would also come across as (gasp) liberal. Republican debate rules should be rooted in conservatism: Simple, clear and unflinchingly firm. Reward winners. Don’t coddle losers.

How do you accomplish that? Boil it down to the one objective measure that really matters before the first vote is cast: money. Here’s the only criterion the RNC needs: Only let on stage the top 12 fundraisers.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; elections; gop; rnc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 05/18/2015 10:57:59 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

12 is still too many. In a two hour debate each candidate would get only 10 minutes to express themselves.


2 posted on 05/18/2015 11:00:28 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A free society canÂ’t let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous extremists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Boil it down to the one objective measure that really matters before the first vote is cast: money.

The GOP-E would just love that.

3 posted on 05/18/2015 11:01:09 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

It will be a real freak show.

All this GOP outreach program needs is a Chinese and Muslim
candidate.


4 posted on 05/18/2015 11:02:34 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
How do you accomplish that? Boil it down to the one objective measure that really matters before the first vote is cast: money. Here’s the only criterion the RNC needs: Only let on stage the top 12 fundraisers.

I agree and just sent another another couple of shekels to TED CRUZ.

If crazy haired donald wants to self fund in order to get on the first staged debate, that's OK with me.

Our guy will make the top twelve in terms of dollars and if he doesn't, we will know that there aren't enough of us to matter.

Then I'll spend my money on ammo.

5 posted on 05/18/2015 11:02:37 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Let the people decide. Every $100 donated during a certain time period would be a vote for that candidate being included and would go to their campaign. But only in $100 increments from verified voters.


6 posted on 05/18/2015 11:03:08 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

On that basis, Rick Santorum, who won the Iowa caucus in 2012 wouldn’t even have been invited.


7 posted on 05/18/2015 11:04:07 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
As long as the money measure includes only individual contributions raised and doesn't include money the RNC steers into certain candidate's coffers, fine.

Otherwise, using the amount of money raised as a measure of who gets to participate in debates will turn out to be just another scam rigged in favor of the GOPe.

8 posted on 05/18/2015 11:04:24 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
The GOP-E would just love that.

What would you propose?

9 posted on 05/18/2015 11:04:39 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Exterminate the terrorist savages, everywhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Oh right, let polls and the establishment decide who is on stage... what could go wrong?


10 posted on 05/18/2015 11:06:04 AM PDT by GeronL (NEW ARRIVALS -> 99 cents buy here: https://www.smashwords.com/books/view/541331)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

12 is too many but the first criteria should be announced candidates, the second should be poll standings and the third should be an ability to raise money. The GOP-E will probably do whatever it takes to stop before Senator Cruz is selected even if the number of debaters is one or if the debates have to be cancelled.


11 posted on 05/18/2015 11:09:55 AM PDT by duffee (Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosef.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

SIMPLE. Get a policritter to define his position on all the so called “issues...” Frankly on the republican side, it should only be about the constitution....period. In any event, if they are all claiming to be republican and they don’t measure up in a clear declaration of their position, then out the door.

It is either that simple, or it’s not and we are lost.

.02, YMMV

KYPD


12 posted on 05/18/2015 11:10:11 AM PDT by petro45acp (Grubbers "stupid" electorate is starting to look very much like Romney's 47%. Just sayin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

“What would you propose?”

Final 4 format. Winners of their bracket is determined by donations of $100. This will eliminate liberals. In addition, donations must be matched up with registered Republicans.

Keep narrowing it down until 4 are left. then 2 debates. One on economic issues and one on international issues.


13 posted on 05/18/2015 11:11:32 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Liawatha, because we need to beat a real commie, not a criminal posing as one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Start with simple set up questions:

PLEASE RAISE YOUR HANDS TO THE FOLLOWING--

1. Who will immediately take action on reversing unconstitutional executive orders, including illegally issued acceleration to resident status for illegals?
2. Who will put all our resources into securing the border?
3. Who will scrap the tax code and make fair tax a priority?
4. Who will hold Washington bureaucrats legally and criminally accountable for violating the rights of American citizens?
5. Who will stop Iran from further development of a nuclear program?

Thank you. The rest of you are dismissed. Now let's get down to business.

14 posted on 05/18/2015 11:12:00 AM PDT by Baynative (For someone to get something without paying for it, someone else must pay for it without getting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Saying that money should be the criteria rather than votes is one of the things wrong with the Republican Party today.


15 posted on 05/18/2015 11:17:19 AM PDT by Engraved-on-His-hands (Conservative 2016!! The Dole, H.W. Bush, McCain, Romney experiment has failed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Better, chuck the whole idea of “debates.” One, they are not debates. Two, they serve to showcase the one or two candidates the leftist interlocutors are interested in. Three, only leftist interlocutors need apply. What possible good can come from debates for which the DNC chooses the interlocutors? If there were no more than three candidates then the Reagan or Cruz among them can spar successfully with the competition and with the leftist interlocutor.


16 posted on 05/18/2015 11:18:32 AM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

17 posted on 05/18/2015 11:19:51 AM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Also anybody that has not actually announced that they are running should not be allowed on the debate stage.


18 posted on 05/18/2015 11:20:37 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

I have a solution:

Winner-take-all cage match. 12 men enter, one man leaves. Welcome to Thunderdome!


19 posted on 05/18/2015 11:20:58 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duffee

I think there should be no more than six on a stage and there should be another six on another stage, and so on until all the candidates are particiopating. These debates should be done simultaneously with the same questions for each panel, and aired consectuvively over 3 nights.

After that first debate, those candidates who receive the most individual contributions whould continue to the next round, narrowing the field to six.

It seems fair to give them all one chance to be heard by the public. Their performance and voter response in contributions will then determine their inclusion or exclusion in the rest of the debate series.


20 posted on 05/18/2015 11:21:35 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson