Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blood of Tyrants

12 is too many but the first criteria should be announced candidates, the second should be poll standings and the third should be an ability to raise money. The GOP-E will probably do whatever it takes to stop before Senator Cruz is selected even if the number of debaters is one or if the debates have to be cancelled.


11 posted on 05/18/2015 11:09:55 AM PDT by duffee (Dump the Chairman of the Mississippi Republican Party, joe nosef.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: duffee

I think there should be no more than six on a stage and there should be another six on another stage, and so on until all the candidates are particiopating. These debates should be done simultaneously with the same questions for each panel, and aired consectuvively over 3 nights.

After that first debate, those candidates who receive the most individual contributions whould continue to the next round, narrowing the field to six.

It seems fair to give them all one chance to be heard by the public. Their performance and voter response in contributions will then determine their inclusion or exclusion in the rest of the debate series.


20 posted on 05/18/2015 11:21:35 AM PDT by conservativejoy (We Can Elect Ted Cruz! Pray Hard, Work Hard, Trust God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: duffee

I agree. Non-announced “candidates” are just in it for the personal exposure and money.


21 posted on 05/18/2015 11:23:29 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (A free society canÂ’t let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous extremists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson