Posted on 05/15/2015 1:52:50 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Scott Walker is certainly ambitious, and planning a run for president may seem par for the course. But for a long timemost of the 1990s, in factWalker was content to be a backbencher in the state assembly and didnt do much to advance himself up the party ranks. While the seniority he gathered in his state assembly career (19932002) from his safe Republican district just outside Milwaukee allowed him to chair some committees, the most attention-grabbing thing he did was to protest the hiring of a Wiccan as a chaplain in a state prison.
The idea that he would become governor of Wisconsin, let alone run for president, was not something anyone observing the political scene at that time would have contemplated. In the midst of a tedious assembly floor session, Walker might well have imagined he could occupy the Oval Office one day. But it took waves of changes in Wisconsins economy and culture, ideological reversals within the Republican Party, and even political scandal to get him to a point where he could be taken seriously. Whether he can go farther than the governors office may depend, like so much of his career, on forces beyond his controlbut so far hes succeeded by positioning himself as a contrast to the dominant political figures of his time, figures like Tommy Thompson, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama.
In the Wisconsin of the 1990s there simply wasnt much of a market for Walkers brand of supply-side/austerity economics and social conservatism, outside of a handful of electoral districts. All across the state new schools were being constructed or older ones remodeled, the result of a unique stimulus program in which districts agreed to set a limit on property taxes in return for generous state aid, which they put towards building projects. This was part of the Main Street conservatism espoused by Tommy Thompson, the Republican who was governor throughout the decade.
Like Walker, Thompson began as a backbencherfirst elected to the state assembly in 1966, he rose to become the top Republican in the legislature and then governor for a record 14 years. The difference between Thompson and Walker is one of background. Thompson is from the small rural town of Elroy, the son of a schoolteacher mother and gas-station/country-store-owning father. Thompson was never opposed philosophically to government largesseeither spending or tax creditsto stimulate a rural economy subject to the boom and bust cycles of agriculture and mineral extraction. Flush times in the 1990s filled state coffers and made such spending possible without busting the budget, and those opposed to it in the legislative backbenches kept their opinions to themselves. As long as Thompson maintained his Catholic opposition to abortion, showed a commitment to welfare reform, and kept winning elections, he was safe far as his position in the Republican Party went.
Walker, the son of an itinerant Baptist preacher, comes originally from the highly evangelical community of Colorado Springs, Colorado and didnt even live in Wisconsin until the age of 10. The city of Delavan, where the Walker family settled, was transitioning from rural farming community to Milwaukee exurb during the 1980s just as they moved in. This was the milieu in which Walker grew up, and it helped shape his political outlook. So did his later involvement with the Young Republicans while attending Marquette University; his experience representing the edge city of Wauwatosa in the heavily segregated Milwaukee metro area (according to 2010 Census figures, Wauwatosa is 90 percent white) in the state assembly; and seeing the areas conservative politics and activism come to be dominated by a group of talk-radio hostsMark Belling, Charlie Sykes, Jeff Wagner, and Jay Weberat two Milwaukee AM stations. These stations get their ratings and make their money not from the city but from the suburban and exurban regions around itplaces like Delavan, for example. Places where a good proportion of states voting population was residing by 2001.
That was the year things began to change in Wisconsinand for Walker, still a backbencher at the time. Thompson left the governors mansion to become secretary of Health and Human Services in the George W. Bush administration. Wisconsins economy began a long period of stagnation with the recession of 2001, and a series of political scandals gave Walker the opportunity to make his way in the larger political world on his own terms. In 2002 a county pension-fund scheme that paid out hundreds of thousands of dollars to long-time employees and cost millions to taxpayers forced the recall of several Milwaukee County board members and prompted County Executive F. Thomas Ament to resign rather than face a recall election himself. At the same time, Thompsons heir apparentnot his hapless lieutenant governor and gubernatorial successor, Scott McCallum, who was quickly turned out of office by Democrat Jim Doyle in 2002, but then-state assembly speaker and former Thompson chief of staff Scott Jensenwas charged with political corruption.
Despite the countys Democratic lean, in this climate Walker was able to win a special election for Milwaukee County Executive as a non-partisan reformerliterally, since all of the states county offices are non-partisan. Thereafter he relied on the low turnout in county races to ensure his re-election, while he leveraged his position as head of the states largest county for his eventual statewide run. Jensen, meanwhile, spent much this time fighting the charges against him in court, and the effort drove him out of politics altogether by 2006. The GOP lost power in the state government and fell into shambles. The leadership vacuum cleared the way for Walkers rise, helped by allies like Congressman Paul Ryan and state party chairman and eventual RNC head Reince Priebus.
Walker made it a point to return half his salary as a full-time county executive back to general fund, but even in this he was out of step with Republican Party of the early 2000s. This was the era of George W. Bush, 9/11, and the Global War on Terror that sprung from it. It was also the era in which another Midwestern Republican governor, Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota, was demonstrating what an activist big-government conservative could do at the state level. But Walker didnt embrace the ethos of Bush or Pawlenty, and by hewing to a limited-government ideology he positioned himself to take advantage of what was to come within the GOP and in the aftermath of the Bush years. Indeed, had the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan not turned out badly, had the bailouts of 2008 not taken place, and had the disappointment of conservatives towards the Bush administration not been so intense, Walker would still be a local political figure, if that.
♦♦♦
Barack Obama has inadvertently helped Walker as well. When Obama won the 2008 Wisconsin Democratic presidential primary over Hillary Clinton by whopping 5841 percent, the election took place in February. Traditionally the states presidential primary had been held on the first Tuesday in April, coinciding with county elections. But state officials moved the primary up two months to have more influence on the race. This turned out to be the biggest break in all of Walkers career. Had the primary been in April, turnout for Obama might well have pulled State Senator Lena Taylor, a black Milwaukee Democrat, ahead of Walker in that years election for county executive. Instead, the county-executive election was held in April, and the low turnout meant Walker won re-election overwhelmingly.
This wouldnt be the last time Obama aided Walkers political career. The unpopularity of Obamacare in 2010 unleashed a Republican wave that swept Democrats out of power in Wisconsin and gave Republicans full control of state government for the first time since 1996, with Walker as governor. Obamas unpopularity in 2014 no doubt contributed to Walkers re-election. The polarization of the electorate in southeast Wisconsin, while no doubt starting earlier, crystalized the moment the non-white Obama took office. The suburbs and exurbs of Milwaukee in between Madison, Green Bay, and the Illinois border have always been the most conservative parts of the state. But where a progressive, liberal candidate could formerly win about 35 percent, maybe over 40 percent in a good electoral year, the vote totals collapsed in 2010.
Now such candidates can do no better than 2530 percent in the region, especially in the WOW counties of Waukesha, Ozaukee, and Washington to north and west of Milwaukee, where Republican voting percentages now reach between 70 and 80 percent and turnout rivals that of the Democrat strongholds of Dane (Madison) and Milwaukee Counties. It used to be a political axiom in Wisconsin that if a Democrat running for statewide office carried more than 60 percent of the vote in Milwaukee County, he would win automatically. Today it doesnt matter. Walkers 2014 opponent, Mary Burke, carried 63 percent of the vote in Milwaukee County and over 70 percent in the city.
Are these new voting propensities due to race, as some have suggested? Well, Bill Clinton, a polarizing political figure in his own right, carried the usual liberal percentages in the WOW counties while being re-elected in 1996, and the Milwaukee AM talk show hosts have been on the air for over well two decades, without bringing about any real changes in voting patterns until a nonwhite person was elected president. The racial segregation of residential housing in the Milwaukee region is among the highest in the United States. There is a legacy of racial strife going back to open-housing marches and riots in the 1960s, and tensions between blacks and the citys police force continue to this day. Conservatives, however, can point out that they eagerly cast their votes for the black sheriff of Milwaukee County, David Clarke, who shares Walkers political views.
Perhaps the new electoral trends are best understood as votes against what Milwaukee represents as a big city seen from the vantage point of those outside it: crime, disorder, welfare, unemployment, political militancy, you name it. Thus current Milwaukee mayor Tom Barrett found out the hard way in two straight losses to Walkerin 2010 and the recall election of 2012why its difficult for any big-city mayor to become governor of his home state, and why no Milwaukee mayor has ever been elected governor of Wisconsin. This is why the politics of southeast Wisconsin has become much like the politics of southeastern Michigan, even if Milwaukee has avoided the dramatic decline that a fellow Rust Belt city like Detroit has gone through. One of Walkers first acts as governor was to cancel contracts to build a light-rail line connecting Milwaukee to Madison, with stops all through the western Milwaukee suburbs. Was this an act of economyWalker has long been an opponent of mass transit, and the state was facing a huge budget deficitor racial tribalism since minorities may well ride such lines from the city into the suburbs; or both since, as in so many of these circumstances, economic and demographic interests coincide?
♦♦♦
One thing Walker will not have to do while running for president is apologize to the Republican base for anything he did in office. This is what the Pawlenty had to do in 2012, on account of his big-government conservatism in word and deed from 20032011. His record put Pawlentys campaign in a vise, squeezed by fellow Minnesotan Michelle Bachmann on the right and similarly moderate governor Mitt Romney in the center. Pawlenty was four years too late for his campaign, while Walker has timed his just right. Not only has Walker benefited from the Tea Party crusade against deficits, spending, and cronyismthemes hes used throughout his careerhe has done so while never having to be a merely Tea Party candidate. Hes had the full support of the party establishment, as it is now constituted in Wisconsin, since 2009, and thus he can have his feet in both the establishment and activist camps without being compromised. Nor will he have to worry about an in-state rival, as Congressman Ryan has deferred to Walkers ambitions, whereas Bachmannmore independent and Tea Party in her outlook and mannerwould not defer to Pawlentys.
Wisconsin has provided lucky breaks for Walker in other respects as well. He benefits from the fact that immigration to the state has been relatively low, so hes never had to make controversial policy decisions about immigrants. Social issues outside of race have never been a contentious part of Wisconsin politics, so theres nothing hes done or said from a policy standpoint that would be extra baggage to him with moderate votersindeed, during the 2014 campaign one of his commercials made it sound like he was in favor of safe abortions, something no doubt done to limit defections among female voters to his opponent, Mary Burkewhile he still maintains his credibility as a religious conservative. And as governor, hes never had to take any stands at all on foreign policy, which allows him to simply adopt whatever the GOP consensus is on the topic. If the various factions of the right are looking for a unity candidate against a Jeb Bush or Chris Christie, they can hardly go wrong with Walker.
But for all the ways in which Wisconsins peculiarities have aided Walkers ambitions, the state capitol protests of 2011 and subsequent recall effort in 2012 over the state budgets Act 10 nearly torpedoed his dreams. Act 10, also known as the Wisconsin Budget Repair Bill, cut benefits to state employees and limited the collective-bargaining rights of public-sector unions, all in an effort to make up a $3.6 billion state budget shortfall. Other governors had closed budget gaps through a variety of means; that Walker and his allies did so in this way was a choice made for a political purpose: to cripple those public-employee unions that were staunch supporters of the Democratswhich is why the states firemen and police were exempted from Act 10; they had endorsed Walker. The protests and the recall elections that followed were certainly unexpected, and they ultimately cost three Republican state senators their seatsbriefly giving Democrats control of the state senate in the fall of 2012along with contributing to the landslide defeat of Walkers candidate for Milwaukee County Executive and the near defeat of a conservative state supreme court justice in his re-election bid in the spring of 2011.
But Walker himself survived because he correctly judged that middle-class residents in a mostly middle-class stateespecially those working in labor-intensive fields like manufacturing, construction, and mid-sized farmingwould not be sympathetic to government workers, whose Cadillac health plans and pensions were supported by taxpayers who themselves no longer enjoyed such benefits and believed they never would again in a globalized economy with private-sector unionism reduced to almost nothing. As the working class of the 1930s became a broad middle class after World War II, they lost their sense of solidarity and became divided by other concernsracial, ethnic, religious, ideological, and so forth. And in the midst of the Great Recession, holding on to what you had while making sure your neighbor didnt get the leg up on you with your own taxes became the driving concern for a majority of the states voters. Thus Act 10 turned into a middle-class civil war, and those living in rural and mid-sized Wisconsin communitieswhere the states balance of power restssided with the governor (as did the courts, which have upheld the law). Divide and conquer, as Walker himself said candidly to a supporter in an exchange caught on video.
Walker was re-elected as governor in 2014the 20th anniversary of the Republican Revolution in which the GOP won the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years. That was the point at which the Republican Party made the transition from being the presidential party to being the legislative party. After controlling the White House from 19691993 with only a four-year interruption, the GOP has now been in control of the House of Representatives from 19952015 with only a four-year interruption. But the problem with being the legislative party when the other side occupies the White Houseas Democrats have done for all but eight years between 1993 and 2015is that you may not be accomplishing anything from a policy standpoint, only blocking the presidents initiatives.
Walkers strength as a presidential candidate comes from the fact that hes a doer when it comes to policy. As Michael Tate, former chairman of the state Democratic Party, told The Capital Times in Madison, even if most Wisconsin voters dont fully agree with, or like, what [Walkers] done, they believe that he is a person of action. And they feel that unlike other politicians, Scott Walker is not afraid to stand up and do something and they respect that.
He remains a polarizing figure: his re-election share of vote was only 52 percent, and he hasnt demonstrated he can win a statewide election with voter turnout above 60 percent. (Turnout in Wisconsin averaged 60.93 percent over the last six presidential elections, according to the Christian Science Monitor, and surpassed 70 percent in 2012.) But none of the other Republican contenders can easily face such numbers either, which is why the GOP is the still the legislative party. And in a state where a famous football coach once said, winning isnt everything, its the only thing, Scott Walker has given his party all it could ask forwhich might be what Republican voters nationwide are looking for, too.
Sean Scallon is a journalist living in Arkansaw, Wisconsin.
There is little here to distinguish this author from those on the fringe left that have decided that Scott Walker is "Unelectable White" to smear him and incite racial divide to rile opposition to Scott Walker.
So you've read Sean Scallon piece above. After I finished it , I wanted to learn more about Scallon's beliefs since he only writes periodically for The American Conservative site.
Which led me to this: Ron Paul and Free Republic:
I met Dr. Dan "Red" Phillips at last year's JRC gathering in Rockford and we've corresponding ever since. He's a writer like myself to I'm happy to put his pieces on my blog like this one on Ron Paul and Free Republic: --Sean Scallon
......Rep. Pauls campaign is really the answer to prayer for many conservatives. Here is a paragraph I wrote from a previous column. This column first appeared 9 Jan 07.
Based on the reaction to the Baker commission and talk of surges, the official Right does not look like it will be abandoning its embrace of neo-con interventionism any time soon. The base is still broadly supportive of the policy. None of the potential GOP presidential candidates in 2008 are anti-war. Senator Hagel (R-NE) could probably be described as a realist, but the base hates him because of it. Both possible paleo-esq candidates, Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO) and Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA), are pro-war. Front-runner Senator McCain (R-AZ) is the loudest voice calling for more troops. (Rep. Ron Paul, are you listening?)[emphasis added]
I am not trying to take credit for his decision to run. I just want to demonstrate that Rep. Pauls potential campaign really is for many of us, the best political news in a long, long time.
So I was eager to share my excitement with my paleo friends, but I was also interested to see how some of the more militantly (no pun intended) pro-intervention sites were dealing with the news. So I went to the Mother of All pro-intervention sites, Free Republic..........
Which lead me to look up JRC which took me here:
September 27, 2007 The Defective Right
Last weekend, the John Randolph Club held its annual meeting in Washington, DC. It is a project of the Rockford Institute, a group with which I have been associated for a quarter century. The JRC was founded eighteen years ago to bring together traditional conservatives and right-libertarians for a dialogue on issues of common concern. As Rockford President Thomas Fleming noted in his opening speech, the libertarians dont much attend the JRC these days. Unfortunately, they have been replaced by left-wingers (libertarian and Marxist) whose mission is not dialogue, but subversion.
This was made painfully evident during the closing debate. The resolution presented was America should immediately withdraw her armed forces from Iraq. I was on the negative side, and thought that the extreme phrasing of the resolution guaranteed its defeat. Immediate withdrawal is not what is being debated in the U.S. Congress, or anywhere else among responsible people. It is the stuff of radicals like Moveon.org and International ANSWER, who oppose all policies aimed at defending U.S. interests in the world or advancing American values. .................
...........What was shocking was not what these radicals said, as they have been spewing their anti-American hatred for years. But that when they did so at a gathering of supposedly traditional conservatives, they got applause from a sizeable slice of the audience! And at the end of the debate, the audience seemed evenly split on the resolution. There has always been an isolationist leaning among the JRC crowd, but this is only an imagined conservative principle. The United States did not march across North America and become the worlds leading nation by playing a shrinking violet. Opposition to Americas rise at every stage has always been rooted in the Left, where dissent against ones own society and its constructive values is a defining trait. Some on the right have been seduced by this self-destructive ideology at times, as in the 1930s, but always with disastrous consequences.
Among this disagreeable lot, there was the usual ignorant bashing of neoconservatives. The neocons were liberals who shifted to the right during the Cold War, attracted by the strong foreign and defense policies that were the hallmark of traditional conservatism. The neocons did not pervert American policy, they embraced and reinforced it. It is the defection from the goal of American preeminence by some on the right since the Cold War that marks a change. Those who want to see other powers rise as America retreats, in order to create a multipolar world (the term was actually used by several people), are the ones who have defected from the right.
There is no authentic conservative tradition of turning against ones country in a time of war. Anyone with that shameful inclination has to move to the Left to find arguments and solace as shown at the JRC. They end up sounding just like Raimondo and Sale, shouting about how patriotism is a dirty word because America is the source of all evil in the world.
In some ways, the Rockford Institute is in the same bind as the Democratic Party. Its leaders know the dangers posed by the fringe elements, but it is reluctant to shut them out for fear of losing members. On my side of the JRC platform was Rockfords foreign affairs editor, Srdja Trifkovic. A scholar with Serbian roots, he well knows the threat of radical Islam, about which he has written extensively. His objection to an immediate and complete withdrawal was, however, less robust than mine. He wants to cut Americas costs from the war, thus favors a phased redeployment, but in a way that does not lead to disaster. His approach could be called Democratic Plus, as he argued that the U.S. has national interests in the region related to blocking Iranian influence and protecting oil supplies. Neither of these missions is going to end soon. Indeed, the struggle for oil (and other resources) is increasing on a global scale, influencing the policies of all the worlds contending powers.
A debate between Trifkovic and me would have been more legitimate for a real conservative audience, as we would have been arguing over how best to accomplish American objectives, not whether America deserved to lose the war and decline as a civilization. .....
(1) Spell the "dog" in "dogwood."
(2) Spell the "cat" in "catfish."
(3) Spell the "f*uck" in "Reagan."
I’m running a little slow headed this morning. What does your post mean?
This guy is obsessed with race. If Wisconsin were as racially polarized as he claims, it wouldn’t vote Democrat for President, or virtually any other office since the state is only 6% Black. Wisconsin unfortunately has a lot of brainwashed, true-believing White Stalinists (produced either by the universities, big labor or government workers), most especially on display in the very ugly city of Madistan (physically beautiful, like San Francisco, but infested with an ideology of ugly and deadly).
With the Obamanoids beating the racist divide, this meme will be used by campaigns all stripes.
It’s all they have.
It is ugly but it’s all that they have.
Walker a racist?
It’s ludicrous.
I don’t see a problem with the article. It seems like a fair analysis of Scott Walker’s career and reasonably positive.
Not every article that is written about a political candidate is going to be gushingly positive and declaring the candidate the second coming. In fact those sorts of articles come off as propaganda and are usually ignored by readers after the first paragraph. You’re dealing with a public whose BS sensors are set to 100%.
It isn’t the history, it’s the framing of it that is telling.
Evil triumphs when good men do nothing
What a dumb-a$$ post. Seriously.
Are you trying to communicate something beside that you are a fool?
Because if so, you failed.
It sounds like a well worked plan to me, but maybe it's just luck.
There is too much white vs black in this author's head.
I agree.
And remember the old adage - “people make their own luck,” which mainly comes from being prepared and then acting when opportunity presents itself.
Or it could be that he was just more politically savvy than John Kasich. Walker's reform has stood, while the Ohio reform has been repealed by a popular referendum.
Luck is the residue of preparation.
More properly stated;
Luck is the point where opportunity and preparation meet.
Which defines the old adage.
bfl
Yeah, this article was so race-focused I was surprised to see it on American Conservative.
Most egregious was the author describing what we called the Half Fast Train in racial terms. As if a train for elites riding from downtown Milwaukee to Madison was going to help Milwaukees minorities. Because it was supposed to be a ‘high speed’ train, only one stop was planned for the suburbs and it was in a rather job-free location.
Walker killed it because it was a typical federal expensive boondoggle that benefitted just a microscopic number of Milwaukeeans.
As for the suburban counties and racism, just like Detroit and other major cities, many many people in the counties were driven from the city by the increasing crime and failing schools. As long as Democrats keep corkscrewing cities into bankruptcy (hello Chicago!) there will be solidarity among the surrounding populace decrying terrible policies and exploitation.
This pretty much confirms my neglect to visit American Conservative occasionally.
..don’t underestimate the white guilt thing....it’s BIG in many white bread states......
“........the first few paragraphs I DID read spoke of a guy that wanted to make a difference”..........
Speak softly (or not at all) and you enemies will wonder what you are up to. Walker was a quiet man who has worked his way to where he is by listening and making mostly good decisions. Wisconsin is far better off than when we were stuck with a demodummie as governor. While I may/may not support Walker for president should he get the nod as the GOP’s choice, he one hell of a lot better than ANYONE the demodummies bring forth and many rinos as well.
[People make their own luck.]
Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou art God. Psalm 90:2. Luck is nonexistent. Luck in any form is not of God. We dont get lucky. The dictionary describes luck as success that seems to happen by chance. Good luck, good fortune, chance, bad luck, these are all derived from a pagan mindset. In paganism God is replaced by a lucky set of circumstances. Yet true Christians know nothing happens by chance. This is how the whole idea of evolution got started and promoted to the extent that it is today. People are overwhelmingly inclined to believe in chance because theyve been so programmed. (excerpt...)http://www.precious-testimonies.com/Exhortations/f-j/GoodLuckNoWay.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.