Paul’s done some real good on this front. In before Ansell kills the thread.
Hit everyone HARD with that message. They endorse Killing up until nine MONTHS!! Shows images of they way they discard of these poor children, and they ARE children), show sonograms at nine months.
Hit HARD!! We need to win this election.
If four percent are horrified by what they see and hear that puts us over the edge.
Schultz is of her father, the devil...so are many of her fellow democrats.
I think a large number of leftists would openly support post-birth infanticide if they thought they could get away with it. For now, they have decided to hold their collective tongue (at least publicly) on that issue.
The Republicans need to force the MSM to ask the Democrats the same questions they ask the Republicans.
A lot of “independents” will be shocked at the responses they hear from the Democrats.
Not only babies, but anyone who is not able to live a quality life. Even veterans in the VA, but I’ll get into that soon. Hey, make sure you have a mental health check up because 2/3 of Belgian docs want mentally ill people put down, too. Stand up now or gun-toting, Bible thumping, Constitutionalists will all be declared mentally unstable by the APA. Come to think of it, someone better see what studies are being funded by the mighty taxpayer at the universities because they will be the backbone of the legislature.
This is how my brain works. Was about to post but then thought about statistics (which I can’t do). If the LGBT group is now normal, doesn’t that skew all the “norms” in previous studies? Won’t pedophilia effect the results in child abuse studies?
Did Paul actually say, “murder a seven month old fetus”, or did he say “a seven pound baby?” Just asking. I think the way HE actually said it was more dramatic and forceful than the way he was quoted. I only ask this because I think we need to use every ounce of force we have against this murderous scourge of infanticide, and not lose any of it through inaccurate quoting.
One thing I would like to see conservative Republicans do is reject the premise that this is about "reproductive" rights. Every time some pro-abortion liberal goes on to talk about "reproductive choices," the conservative should say something like, "I am not talking about that. Every woman has the right to take whatever action necessary to prevent pregnancy. I am talking about the abortions that some women have after they failed to exercise the reproductive rights that everyone agrees they have."
This could probably be phrased better, but conservatives need to make the point that by the time pregnancy occurs, it's too late to be talking about a woman's "reproductive choices." At that point, she's already made them. Abortion is about the legality of killing a kid that the woman already chose to bring into existence.
For the life of me I don’t understand why republicans run from this issue or marriage. Americans want leadership on these issues. Fight back! To focus on economic issues only is a completely failed plan.
bookmark