[markomalley]

video at link.

[Cherokee Conservative]

He just lost any possibility of getting my vote. Any candidate that panders to the homo movement will not give my vote.

[kanawa]

The question is would you understand and respect another’s decision not to attend a ‘gay wedding’.

[JudyinCanada]

Attending would be condoning. I could not attend a ceremony for two homosexuals pretending to be married.

What do you say? Congratulations? Best wishes? I’m so happy for the two of you?

One would need to lovingly decline, and clearly state the reason.

[Chainmail]

Rubio: Just doesn't get it, does he? First he's for illegal immigration and amnesty and now he doesn't see anything wrong with attending the destruction of real marriage.

Toast.

[hondact200]

Go Away Marco Rubio. Come now Gay Marriage is not natural. If God intended the same species same gender o reproduce themselves he wold have mad them in the first place. So in essence marco Rubio is placing the issue of a marriage of a man and woman on the back burner for political correctness. the next thing he will say is everyone must be like an Amoeba, and have the ability to reproduce itself. alk about stuoid politicians Rubio - open mouth insert foot and hop away.

[Cowboy Bob]

That was a rather queer statement to make!

[Caipirabob]

But would he kiss the bride?

[MotorCityBuck]

Yea. As the Bride.

[Catmom]

Sigh...

So few people have the guts any more to just say something’s wrong when it is.

[Sacajaweau]

Attending is condoning. There's no such thing as a homo marriage. They just made it up and went with it and the government made it into some right and condemns ME for not condoning it.

Just like the right to kill babies in the womb...

My God....what happened.

[Cowboy Bob]

According to a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 74 percent of 18-to-34-year-olds said they were in favor of allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. On Tuesday, CNN anchor Jake Tapper called Rubio “the candidate of yesterday” on the issue of marriage equality.

If Hollywood and the MSM were to decide tomorrow that homosexuality was evil, and promoted it as such in the media, within a few years, the 18-to-34-year-olds of America would be chasing the queers through the streets with pitchforks and baseball bats.

The MSM has shown that a significant portion of America can be manipulated to think and behave in a desired way. Propaganda works!

[driftless2]

So if Rubio’s close family member decided to marry his daughter or his dog, Rubio would attend so as not to hurt his family member’s feelings. Okay.

[don-o]

There’s a bridge burned. He’s clearly writing off socons and that’s his call, of course.

But his convoluted comparison of gay “marriage” and continuing to love divorced persons reveal a shallow understanding of his proclaimed faith. And that calls into question how deeply he has thought about anything.

[vpintheak]

Another “personally I disagree, but....” Lying politician.

[Arm_Bears]

Limbaugh will devote a good deal of his program today trying to explain this away—if he’s even aware of it—as he’s spent a lot of time the last several days attempting to rehabilitate Rube’s amnesty antics.

[Dr. Sivana]

Sure, I’d attend a homosexual wedding. If a fellow with that predisposition found a woman willing to put up with that kind of challenge I’d wish them all the best. Now, if someone wants to have an expensive ceremony and reception attached to an oxymoronic fantasy, I have better things to do with my time.

[Ann Archy]

So he’s going to sit there and watch two men KISS or two women KISS??? OMG! How disgusting.

[John O]

He is neither Catholic nor conservative. We don’t need any pro-homo candidates.

[bmwcyle]

I’d never would have voted for you at all before you said it, Rubio.

[Reno89519]

If he disagreed with homosexual marriage he would not go, regardless of who is involved. Doesn’t matter as Marco “Amnesty” Rubio is not a serious candidate. He’s just trying to get his second 15 minutes of fame.