There’s a bridge burned. He’s clearly writing off socons and that’s his call, of course.
But his convoluted comparison of gay “marriage” and continuing to love divorced persons reveal a shallow understanding of his proclaimed faith. And that calls into question how deeply he has thought about anything.
I'm not certain I understand your statement. Are you saying that "divorced persons" should not be loved? And if so, why would you say that?
Loving all people, even people who are vile sinners, is what God expects of us. This love does not mean we support wrongful actions, however. Even God loves sinners, however, he encourages to not keep sinning. That’s the key. Do I agree with my grandmother’s getting divorced years ago? No I don’t, but OTOH, I am supportive and caring of her without condoning what she did. Loving divorcees is not wrong, considering divorce without the proper justification (an unrepentant adulterous spouse) to be right when it isn’t, IS WRONG.