Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: One in Three Say Businesses Should Be Allowed to Refuse Gays on Religious Grounds
nbcnews.com ^ | April 9, 2015

Posted on 04/09/2015 10:52:28 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012

Roughly a third of Americans say that businesses should be allowed to refuse gay customers on religious grounds, and the figure rises to almost half for businesses that provide wedding services, according to an NBC News poll released on Thursday.

The poll found a sharp political divide on the issue. By a margin of 65 percent to 35 percent, Republicans said that businesses should be allowed to turn away gay customers. Democrats, by a margin of 82-18, said that they should not.

The youngest group of respondents, people aged 18 to 29, were most likely to say that businesses should be required to serve gay customers — a margin of roughly 3-to-1.

The poll, which surveyed 2,052 adults nationwide, was taken Monday through Wednesday, in the wake of a nationwide furor over laws in Indiana and Arkansas that supporters said were designed to protect religious freedom.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2015 10:52:28 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Way too low numbers.


2 posted on 04/09/2015 10:54:32 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Media members fiddling with the polls, no doubt.


3 posted on 04/09/2015 11:00:32 AM PDT by Politicalkiddo ("The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Sounds like a push-poll to me.

Businesses should have the RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL so as to comply with their conscience.


4 posted on 04/09/2015 11:01:24 AM PDT by Canedawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Either way, it’s none of the feds business. Sexual orientation and discrimination of same is not an issue over which the Constitution gives the feds. These are states’ issues via the will of the people of each state.


5 posted on 04/09/2015 11:02:05 AM PDT by PapaNew (The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

No one has been arguing for denying service just because they are gay, it’s conduct the gays are forcing on everyone else.

As usual it’s in how the question is phrased. Had they asked “should a business be forced to participle in an activity which violates their religious beliefs”, you might get different results.


6 posted on 04/09/2015 11:03:23 AM PDT by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

Freedom of religion is not up for vote.


7 posted on 04/09/2015 11:04:33 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

You would think but people are being driven out of business for their religious beliefs.


8 posted on 04/09/2015 11:05:58 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

I do not think businesses should be “allowed to refuse gays” at all. Ridiculous. That would be like refusing left handers or Japanese.

1. On religious grounds, businesses should be able to refuse activity that is prohibited by their beliefs. Meaning if a clearly gay couple came into the bakery and wanted to buy two pink sprinkled cupcakes, you can’t refuse to sell them. But if they wanted you to help with their wedding party, you may refuse.

2. Businesses may refuse to serve anyone at any time. But the reasons should be things like personal (the guy hit on my wife) or cleanliness (a street bum) or safety (a guy who seems drunk and violent). A business should NOT be allowed to keep refusing service to blacks or gays or Jews.


9 posted on 04/09/2015 11:10:36 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

That’s pretty good for a phoney push poll. Even calling gay-friendly zip codes they still found a 3rd rejecting them....


10 posted on 04/09/2015 11:11:01 AM PDT by Mechanicos (Nothing's so small it can't be blown out of proportion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMC0987
RE :”No one has been arguing for denying service just because they are gay, it’s conduct the gays are forcing on everyone else.”

No one on TV anyway.

But they did ask the same question about wedding services and ~ half responded that businesses should be forced to service those.

11 posted on 04/09/2015 11:11:26 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

It is NOT about refusing to serve “gay” customers.

It is about refusing to provide a specific service, something the business doesn’t provide because of moral conviction.


12 posted on 04/09/2015 11:15:43 AM PDT by Theo (May Christ be exalted above all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012; All

Thank you for referencing that article ilovesarah2012. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

Beware of the PC results of constitutionally ignorant polls.

Even if all Americans thought that business’s should be required to serve gay customers despite religious objections, it remains that both federal and state government’s are obligated to protect the constitutionally enumerated right of religious expression of citizens including business owners.


13 posted on 04/09/2015 11:17:51 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

The issue isn’t rejecting homosexual customers. The issue is being forced to participate in activities found morally repugnant.


14 posted on 04/09/2015 11:18:40 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

That really tells all you need to know about the subject. Absolutely nothing in the Constitution that makes it a federal matter. The states can do what they want with it,but must realize that their decisions can determine a lot about the problems they create for themselves.


15 posted on 04/09/2015 11:26:59 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

This is what we are dealing with folks. We need to spread this meme to others who don't understand what's happening.

16 posted on 04/09/2015 11:28:14 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

I personally feel that anyone should be allowed to make a value judgment in dealing with people on a business level as long as they are not representing government. if I own a business and some one enters my business I should have the right to refuse them business for what ever reason I want to give. I call this my right to be an asshole if I want.


17 posted on 04/09/2015 11:28:18 AM PDT by PCPOET7 (BUT MAK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012
This poll is garbage because it doesn't measure whether the general public supports the right of Christians to refuse to provide services like gay weddings that violate their religious beliefs. When Pew asked that question a few months ago, 57% supported the right of Christians not to provide services for gay weddings.

Polls on abortion a similar broad and vague to make it appear the majority support abortion rights. But, when the polls are more specific, the vast majority oppose abortion except in the cases of rape, incest and the mother's life being endangered.

18 posted on 04/09/2015 11:29:04 AM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

19 posted on 04/09/2015 11:30:07 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: oldtech

States cannot violate the Bill of Rights either.


20 posted on 04/09/2015 11:30:39 AM PDT by GeronL (CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson